检验医学 ›› 2021, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 700-704.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2021.07.004

• 临床应用研究·论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同检测系统抗HCV抗体灰区样本检测一致性分析

陆银华1, 朱宇清1, 赵晓君1, 曹丹如1, 朱岭峰1, 顾志冬2   

  1. 1.上海市临床检验中心,上海 200126
    2.上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院检验科,上海 200025
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-31 出版日期:2021-07-30 发布日期:2021-07-26
  • 通讯作者: 顾志冬
  • 作者简介:顾志冬,联系电话:021-64370045。
    陆银华,女,1980年生,硕士,副主任技师,主要从事免疫学检测和质量管理工作。

Consistency of the results of anti-HCV antibody gray zone samples among different determination systems

LU Yinhua1, ZHU Yuqing1, ZHAO Xiaojun1, CAO Danru1, ZHU Lingfeng1, GU Zhidong2   

  1. 1. Shanghai Center for Clinical Laboratory,Shanghai 200126,China
    2. Department of Clinical Laboratory,Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200025,China
  • Received:2020-07-31 Online:2021-07-30 Published:2021-07-26
  • Contact: GU Zhidong

摘要:

目的 探讨4种国产检测系统与由ARCHITECT i2000SR全自动免疫分析仪及配套试剂组成的检测系统(简称i2000SR检测系统)抗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)抗体灰区样本检测结果的一致性和相关性。方法 分别采用4种国产检测系统[2种使用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)、1种使用时间分辨荧光免疫分析法(CTRFIA)、1种使用化学发光免疫分析法(CLIA)]测定不同浓度的抗HCV抗体标准品,评价各检测系统的线性关系及不精密度[变异系数(CV)]。分别采用4种国产检测系统和i2000SR检测系统测定120例经重组免疫印迹法(RIBA)确认为阳性的抗HCV抗体灰区样本,评价各系统检测结果的相关性和一致性。结果 4种国产检测系统检测不同浓度标准品的批内CV分别为17.6%~25.1%、0.8%~26.7%、7.8%~36.2%和0.7%~20.2%,总CV分别为15.9%~25.3%、1.0%~23.5%、7.7%~34.8%和3.4%~18.9%,线性相关方程分别为Y=0.634X+0.973、Y=2.495X+0.010、Y=1.348X+0.896、Y=2.510X-0.214。对于S/CO值为1.00~3.00的样本,4种国产检测系统与i2000SR检测系统符合率为34.2%~55.2%;对于S/CO值为3.01~6.0的样本,检测符合率为57.5%~80.0%;对于S/CO值为6.01~9.00的样本,4种国产检测系统检测符合率均>90%。4种国产检测系统均阴性的样本数为23份(19.2%),S/CO值的$\bar{x}±3$s为2.80±4.35;4种国产检测系统均阳性的样本数为71份(59.1%),S/CO值的$\bar{x}±3$s为5.13±7.84。4种国产检测系统两两之间的r值分别为0.712 5、0.760 0、0.837 0、0.702 2、0.769 4、0.736 4,Kappa值分别为0.666 3、0.598 5、0.742 6、0.759 3、0.879 0、0.664 8。结论 对于灰区(S/CO值为1.00~9.41)样本,建议应至少使用2种检测系统或使用高特异性的检测系统进行复检。对于低浓度样本或临界值样本,应充分考虑不同检测系统之间可能出现的结果不一致现象,制定合理的灰区范围。

关键词: 丙型肝炎病毒, 抗体, 灰区, 一致性

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the consistency and correlation between 4 domestic determination systems and ARCHITECT i2000SR automatic immunoassay analyzer with supporting reagents(i2000SR system) for determining anti-hepatitis C virus(HCV) antibody gray zone samples. Methods Totally,4 domestic determination systems [2 systems using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA),1 system using time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay(TRFIA) and 1 system using chemiluminescence immunoassay(CLIA)] were used to determine different concentrations of anti-HCV antibody standard products and to evaluate the linearity of each determination system and imprecision [coefficient of variation(CV)]. The 4 domestic determination systems and the i2000SR system were used to determine 120 samples of anti-HCV antibody gray zone,which were confirmed by recombinant immunoblotting assay(RIBA) to evaluate the correlation and consistency of each determination system.Results For the 4 domestic determination systems,the within-run CV were 17.6%-25.1%,0.8%-26.7%,7.8%-36.2% and 0.7%-20.2% for the standard products with different concentrations,respectively. The total CV were 15.9%-25.3%,1.0%-23.5%,7.7%-34.8% and 3.4%-18.9%,respectively. The linear correlation equations were Y=0.634X+0.973,Y=2.495X+0.010,Y=1.348X+0.896 and Y=2.510X-0.214,respectively. The S/CO value of the i2000SR system was 1.00-3.00 samples,and the determination consistency rate of the 4 domestic determination systems was 34.2%-55.2%. The determination consistency rates of the 4 domestic determination systems with S/CO values of 3.01-6.00 samples were 57.5%-80.0%. The determination consistency rates of the 4 domestic determination systems with S/CO values of 6.01-9.00 samples were >90%. The number of samples with negative results from the 4 domestic determination systems was 23(19.2%),and the S/CO value $\bar{x}±3$s was 2.80±4.35. The number of samples with positive results from the 4 domestic determination systems was 71(59.1%),and the S/CO value $\bar{x}±3$s was 5.13±7.84. The correlation coefficients(r)between 2 domestic reagents were 0.712 5,0.760 0,0.837 0,0.702 2,0.769 4 and 0.736 4,respectively. The Kappa values among the domestic reagents were 0.666 3,0.598 5,0.742 6,0.759 3,0.879 0 and 0.664 8,respectively. Conclusions For the gray zone samples(S/CO value of 1.00-9.41),it is recommended that at least 2 reagents or highly specific reagents should be used for retesting. For low-concentration samples or cut-off samples,the possible inconsistencies between different determination systems should be fully considered,and a reasonable gray zone range should be formulated.

Key words: Hepatitis C virus, Antibody, Gray zone, Consistency

中图分类号: