检验医学 ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 148-152.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2023.02.009

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

血清LDL-P与LDL-C检测结果一致性分析

苏珍珍1, 邹继华2, 王惠民3, 徐炜烽2, 丁方4, 张晶梅5(), 王占科2()   

  1. 1.河北北方学院医学检验学院,河北 张家口 075000
    2.美康盛德医学检验所血脂研究院,浙江 宁波 315040
    3.南通大学附属医院检验科,江苏 南通 226019
    4.宁波鄞州中医院神经康复科,浙江 宁波 315040
    5.邢台市第三院输血科,河北 邢台 054000
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-08 修回日期:2022-05-19 出版日期:2023-02-28 发布日期:2023-04-17
  • 通讯作者: 王占科,E-mail:wangzhanke@sina.com;张晶梅,E-mail:504565370@qq.com
  • 作者简介:苏珍珍,女,1995年生,技师,主要从事临床检验工作。
  • 基金资助:
    邢台市科技局重点课题(2020ZC358)

Consistency of serum LDL-P and LDL-C determination results

SU Zhenzhen1, ZOU Jihua2, WANG Huimin3, XU Weifeng2, DING Fang4, ZHANG Jingmei5(), WANG Zhanke2()   

  1. 1. Academy of Medical Laboratory,Hebei North University,Zhangjiakou 075000,Hebei,China
    2. Ningbo Meikang Shengde Medical Laboratory Lipid Research Institute,Ningbo 315040,Zhejiang,China
    3. Department of Clinical Laboratory,the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University,Nantong 226019,Jiangsu,China
    4. Department of Neurorehabilitation,Ningbo Yinzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Ningbo 315040,Zhejiang,China
    5. Department of Blood Transfusion,the Third Hospital of Xingtai,Xingtai 054000,Hebei,China
  • Received:2022-01-08 Revised:2022-05-19 Online:2023-02-28 Published:2023-04-17

摘要:

目的 探讨基于垂直密度梯度离心(VAP)法检测低密度脂蛋白颗粒(LDL-P)与生化均相法检测低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的一致性。方法 选取冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者417例和健康体检者154名,采用VAP法检测LDL-P,采用生化均相法检测LDL-C。分别以3.37 mmol/L和1 000 nmol /L作为LDL-C和LDL-P参考区间的上限。将LDL-C和LDL-P结果一致的样本纳入A组,再细分为A1组(LDL-C和LDL-P结果均正常)和A2组(LDL-C和LDL-P结果均升高);将LDL-C和LDL-P结果不一致的样本纳入B组,再细分为B1(LDL-C正常、LDL-P升高)和B2组(LDL-C升高、LDL-P正常)。采用Pearson相关分析评估各项指标之间的相关性。结果 Pearson相关分析结果显示,LDL-C与LDL-P呈正相关(r=0.666,P=0.000)。A组合计为181例(31.70%),其中A1组95例(16.64%)、A2组86例(15.06%);B组合计为390例(68.30%),其中B1组373例(65.32%)、B2组17例(2.98%)。结论 LDL-C与LDL-P不一致的情况主要为LDL-P升高,临床应关注LDL-P检测结果,避免对LDL-C水平正常人群的漏检。

关键词: 低密度脂蛋白颗粒, 低密度脂蛋白胆固醇, 垂直密度梯度离心, 一致性

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the consistency between the determination of low-density lipoprotein particles(LDL-P) by vertical auto profile(VAP) and the determination of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C) by biochemical homogeneity. Methods A total of 417 patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease and 154 healthy subjects were enrolled to determine LDL-P by VAP and LDL-C level by biochemical homogeneity. The 3.37 mmol/L and 1 000 nmol/L were used as the upper limits of the reference intervals for LDL-C and LDL-P,respectively. The samples with consistent LDL-C and LDL-P results were included in group A and classified into group A1(both LDL-C and LDL-P results were normal) and group A2(both LDL-C and LDL-P results were elevated) according to the determination results. The samples with inconsistent LDL-C and LDL-P results were classified into group B,and they were classified into B1(LDL-C normal,LDL-P elevated) and B2(LDL-C elevated,LDL-P normal). Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation between the indicators. Results The results of Pearson correlation analysis showed that LDL-C and LDL-P were positively correlated(r=0.666,P=0.000). There were 181 cases(31.70%) in group A,including 95 cases(16.64%) in group A1 and 86 cases(15.06%) in group A2. There were 390 cases(68.30%) in group B,including 373 cases(65.32%) in group B1 and 17 cases(2.98%) in group B2. Conclusions The inconsistency between LDL-C and LDL-P is mainly present in patients with high LDL-P,suggesting that LDL-P should be clinically concerned to prevent missed determination in subjects with normal LDL-C levels.

Key words: Low-density lipoprotein particle, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Vertical auto profile, Consistency

中图分类号: