检验医学 ›› 2022, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 1049-1056.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2022.011.010

• 临床应用研究·论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

非空腹血液样本LDL-C检测的临床应用价值

沈盈1, 徐晓萍1(), 张乐乐1, 杜勇平2, 孟超3   

  1. 1.上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院检验科,上海 200127
    2.上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院心内科,上海 200127
    3.上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院老年科,上海 200127
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-13 修回日期:2022-02-07 出版日期:2022-11-30 发布日期:2022-12-26
  • 通讯作者: 徐晓萍
  • 作者简介:徐晓萍,E-mail:xping_xu@qq.com
    沈盈,女,1982年生,学士,技师,主要从事临床生化检验工作。

Clinical value of LDL-C determination in non-fasting blood samples

SHEN Ying1, XU Xiaoping1(), ZHANG Lele1, DU Yongping2, MENG Chao3   

  1. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory,Renji Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200127,China
    2. Department of Cardiology,Renji Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200127,China
    3. Department of Geriatrics,Renji Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200127,China
  • Received:2021-10-13 Revised:2022-02-07 Online:2022-11-30 Published:2022-12-26
  • Contact: XU Xiaoping

摘要:

目的 通过分析4种低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)计算公式(Friedewald公式、Martine公式、Sampson公式和Vujovic公式)与LDL-C直接检测值(记为D-LDL-C)的一致性,探讨非空腹血脂检测的临床应用价值。方法 选取心血管疾病(CVD)患者110例,比较其空腹血脂水平与普通餐后2 h血脂水平的差异。另选取CVD和/或糖尿病(DM)患者291例、健康体检者259名,检测其非严格空腹状态(空腹时间<4 h)下的总胆固醇(TC)、三酰甘油(TG)、LDL-C、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)及小而密低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(sd-LDL-C),计算非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(non-HDL-C)。用4种LDL-C计算公式计算LDL-C,采用Spearman相关分析评价多靶点LDL-C水平上,D-LDL-C与LDL-C计算值在临床评估中的一致性。结果 110例CVD患者餐后2 h的TC、HDL-C、LDL-C、non-HDL-C水平低于空腹水平(P<0.05),sd-LDL-C、TG水平与空腹水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与空腹血脂水平比较,男性餐后2 h的TG水平平均升高0.11 mmol/L(P<0.05)、LDL-C水平平均下降0.13 mmol/L(P<0.05);女性TC、LDL-C和non-HDL-C水平分别降低0.22、0.14、0.19 mmol/L(P<0.05),TG变化不明显(P>0.05)。Spearman相关分析结果显示,4种公式的LDL-C计算值与D-LDL-C均呈正相关(r值分别为0.922、0.953、0.949、0.944,P<0.05)。当TG≤2.26 mmol/L时,Friedewald公式LDL-C计算值与D-LDL-C的偏差最小;当TG>2.26 mmol/L时,Martine公式的偏差最小。选取不同的LDL-C临床干预临界值(2.6、3.4、4.9 mmol/L),对于动脉粥样硬化性心血管病(ASCVD)低危者,当TG>2.3 mmol/L时,Martine公式、Sampson公式、Vujovic公式的LDL-C计算值评估ASCVD风险与D-LDL-C的一致性分别为83.8%、83.8%、82.5%,优于Friedewald公式(72.5%);对于ASCVD高危/极高危者,当TG<2.3 mmo/L时,基于4种公式LDL-C计算值的临床评估结果与基于D-LDL-C的临床评估结果的符合率均≥95%;当TG为2.3~5.6 mmo/L时,Martine公式与D-LDL-C的符合率最高(88.8%);当TG>5.6 mmol/L,4种公式与D-LDL-C缺乏一致性。结论 与空腹血脂水平比较,非空腹血脂水平的变化主要为TG升高、TC和LDL-C下降,不同性别患者非空腹血脂水平的变化不一致。非空腹状态下,尤其是TG>4.52 mmol/L时,LDL-C水平可采用Martine等公式计算,亦可用于ASCVD风险评估。对于高TG血症患者和确诊为CVD、DM且已进行治疗的患者,建议仍在空腹状态下采集其血液样本。

关键词: 低密度脂蛋白胆固醇, 非空腹血脂, Friedewald公式, Martine公式, Sampson公式, Vujovic公式, 心血管疾病

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the consistency of 4 calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C) levels(Friedewald formula,Martine formula,Sampson formula and Vujovic formula) with the direct determination of LDL-C(D-LDL-C) in non-fasting serum,and to evaluate the clinical value of LDL-C determination in non-fasting serum lipids. Methods Totally,110 cardiovascular disease(CVD) patients were enrolled,and the changes of fasting and postprandial 2 h serum lipids were compared. In addition,291 patients with CVD and/or diabetes mellitus(DM) and 259 healthy subjects were enrolled. Non-fasting serum lipids(fasting time <4 h) were determined,which included total cholesterol(TC),triglyceride(TG),LDL-C,high-density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C) and small and dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(sd-LDL-C),and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol(non-HDL-C) was calculated. Spearman correlation analysis was used for D-LDL-C with calculated LDL-C levels,and the consistency was evaluated by different LDL-C cut-off points. Results For CVD patients,the levels of TC,HDL-C,LDL-C and non-HDL-C were lower after 2 h of routine meal(P<0.05),and there was no statistical significance in sd-LDL-C and TG levels whether postprandial or fasting condition(P>0.05). For males,postprandial TG was increased as 0.11 mmol/L on average(P<0.05),and LDL-C was decreased as 0.13 mmol/L(P<0.05). For females,the levels of TC,LDL-C and non-HDL-C were decreased as 0.22,0.14 and 0.19 mmol/L,respectively(P<0.05),and the change of TG level was not obvious(P>0.05). Spearman correlation analysis showed that the calculated LDL-C levels of Friedewald formula,Martine formula,Sampson formula and Vujovic formula were positively correlated with D-LDL-C(r=0.922,0.953,0.949 and 0.944,P<0.05). When TG≤2.26 mmol/L,the mean absolute deviation(MAD) between calculated LDL-C by Friedewald formula and D-LDL-C was minimum,and when TG>2.26 mmol/L,the deviation showed calculated LDL-C by Martine formula was minimum. For atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease(ASCVD) low-risk cases,different LDL-C cut-off points(2.6,3.4 and 4.9 mmol/L) were selected and concerned. When non-fasting serum TG>2.3 mmol/L,the consistency rates of calculated LDL-C of Martine formula,Sampson formula and Vujovic formula with D-LDL-C for evaluating ASCVD risk were 83.8%,83.8% and 82.5%,respectively,which were better than that of Friedewald formula(72.5%). For ASCVD high-risk cases,when TG<2.3 mmol/L,the clinical assessment results of 4 calculated LDL-C levels showed good consistency with D-LDL-C(≥95%). When 2.3<TG<5.6 mmol/L,the calculated LDL-C level of Martine formula showed the highest consistency with D-LDL-C(88.8%). When TG>5.6 mmol/L,all the calculated LDL-C levels had no consistency with D-LDL-C. Conclusions Compared with fasting serum lipids,the levels of non-fasting serum lipids are usually increased in TG level and decreased in TC and LDL-C levels,but there was difference for males and females between fasting and postprandial changes. Using non-fasting calculated LDL-C of Martine formula may do help for the precise estimation of LDL-C level by clinicians,especially when TG>4.52 mmol/L. Non-fasting condition for lipid determination is convenient and acceptable for hypertriglyceridemia and CVD and DM patients,which should choose fasting blood sampling for serum lipid determination.

Key words: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Non-fasting lipid, Friedewald formula, Martine formula, Sampson formula, Vujovic formula, Cardiovascular disease

中图分类号: