Laboratory Medicine ›› 2022, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10): 944-947.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2022.010.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Roles of MxA,CRP and WBC count in the differential diagnosis of acute respiratory tract viral and bacterial infections

LIU Chunxiao1, YI Changlin2, WANG Xiaoshan3, ZHU Yongzhen2, LUO Aner2, CHEN Changqiang2()   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics,Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 201801,China
    2. Department of Clinical Laboratory,Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 201801,China
    3. Department of Emergency Medicine,Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 201801,China
  • Received:2022-03-02 Revised:2022-05-18 Online:2022-10-30 Published:2022-11-14
  • Contact: CHEN Changqiang

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the clinical application values of myxovirus resistance protein A(MxA),C-reactive protein(CRP) and white blood cell(WBC) count in the differential diagnosis of acute respiratory tract viral infection and bacterial infection. Methods The viral infection group(350 cases),bacterial infection group(244 cases) and healthy control group(100 cases) were enrolled for determining MxA,CRP and WBC count. The diagnostic efficacy of the 3 indexes in each group was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve. Results The MxA level in viral infection group was higher than those in bacterial infection group and healthy control group(P<0.05,P<0.01),and that in bacterial infection group was higher than that in healthy control group(P<0.05). The CRP level and WBC count were higher in bacterial infection group than those in viral infection group and healthy control group(P<0.05,P<0.01),and that in viral infection group was higher than that in healthy control group(P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the areas under curves(AUC) of MxA,CRP,WBC count single determinations and combined determination were 0.829,0.703,0.665 and 0.850 for the differential diagnosis of viral infection and bacterial infection,respectively. The differential diagnostic performance of combined determination was better than those of single determinations(P<0.01). Conclusions MxA,CRP and WBC count have good clinical application value in acute respiratory tract infectious diseases. MxA is superior to CRP and WBC count in distinguishing viral infection and bacterial infection,and the differential diagnostic performance of combined determination is better.

Key words: Myxovirus resistance protein A, C-reactive protein, White blood cell count, Acute respiratory tract infection