Laboratory Medicine ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 291-294.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2020.04.001

• Orginal Article •     Next Articles

Clinical evaluation of different detection methods of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies in the COVID-19 diagnosis

ZHENG Peiming, CUI Facai, ZHANG Fuming, LI Gang()   

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory,Henan Provincial People's Hospital,Zhengzhou University People's Hospital,Henan University People's Hospital,Zhengzhou 450003,Henan,China
  • Received:2019-03-18 Online:2020-04-30 Published:2020-05-19

Abstract:

Objective To compare different detection methods of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2) IgM and IgG antibodies in the diagnosis of corona virus disease 2019(COVID-19). Methodse Serum samples were collected from 25 patients diagnosed as COVID-19,and 27 patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled as control group. SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies were detected by chemiluminescence and colloidal gold method. The procalcitonin(PCT),C-reactive protein(CRP) and ferritin were also determined. Results The sensitivities of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies by chemiluminescence were 48% and 56%,respectively,while those by colloidal gold method were 88% and 76%,respectively. The specificities were both 100% for the 2 methods. The total coincidence rates of IgM and IgG antibodies between the 2 methods were 68.9% and 73.3%,respectively. Serum PCT levels were increased in 36% COVID-19 patients,serum CRP levels were increased in 72% COVID-19 patients,and serum ferritin were increased in 84% COVID-19 patients. Conclusions The clinical performance of different detection methods of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies are varied,which should be considered comprehensively in the clinical diagnosis of COVID-19.

Key words: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, Immunoglobulin, Antibody, Chemiluminescence, Colloidal gold method, Corona virus disease 2019

CLC Number: