Laboratory Medicine ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 28-31.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2023.01.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Diagnostic efficacy and clinical application evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 antigen determination

YANG Danping, WANG Hong, WANG Can, CHEN Wei, YANG Aiping()   

  1. Shanghai Songjiang Jiuting Hospital,Shanghai 201615,China
  • Received:2022-02-01 Revised:2022-10-25 Online:2023-01-30 Published:2023-03-15

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the clinical application value and diagnostic efficacy of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2) antigen determination. Methods From March to June 2022,340 asymptomatic patients at the initial stage of corona virus disease 2019(COVID-19) in a shelter in Songjiang District,4 294 residents in a sealed control area,420 residents in a management control area and 800 residents in a prevention area were randomly enrolled for the determination of SARS-CoV-2 antigen. The positive SARS-CoV-2 antigen determination results were rechecked with double-reagent nucleic acid. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was used to evaluate the efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 antigen qualitative determination for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results The positive rate of SARS-CoV-2 antigen determination on the first day of shelter was 81.0%,and the average true positive rate of SARS-CoV-2 antigen determination in sealed control area and management control area was 43.1%. The positive rate of nucleic acid test was higher than that of SARS-CoV-2 antigen determination(P<0.01),and the consistency of the 2 methods was poor(Kappa value was 0.266). The turn-to-negative time of SARS-CoV-2 antigen determination was earlier than that of nucleic acid test(P<0.05),and the antigen determination line (T line) did not show colour when the cycle threshold(Ct) value was >28. The area under curve was 0.773 for SARS-CoV-2 antigen determination. Conclusions Antigen determination can be used as an auxiliary method in the early screening of SARS-CoV-2,but it can not replace nucleic acid test.

Key words: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, Antigen qualitative determination, Nucleic acid test, Diagnostic efficacy

CLC Number: