Laboratory Medicine ›› 2021, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 396-399.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2021.04.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of 4 commercial kits for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid

CHEN Jianbo1, YANG Yong2, LI Huiyuan3, REN Chanjun1, DU Juan1, LI Genshi1, TAO Ran4, CHEN Jingxian5, ZHANG Ling4, LI Miao3()   

  1. 1. Wuhan Kingmed Center for Clinical Laboratory,Wuhan 430100,Hubei,China
    2. Gansu Kingmed Center for Clinical Laboratory,Lanzhou 730070,Gansu,China
    3. Changsha Kingmed Center for Clinical Laboratory,Changsha 410006,Hunan,China
    4. Guangzhou Kingmed Center for Clinical Laboratory,Guangzhou 510005,Guangdong,China
    5. Research Center for Clinical Virology,the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease,Guangzhou 510005,Guangdong,China
  • Received:2020-04-12 Online:2021-04-30 Published:2021-04-28
  • Contact: LI Miao

Abstract:

Objective To compare the performance of 4 commercial kits for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acid. Methods Totally,318 pharyngeal swab samples were collected. After nucleic acid extraction,these samples were detected by the 4 commercial kits. Results Kappa values were 0.741(Kit A vs Kit B),0.653(Kit A vs Kit C),0.510(Kit A vs Kit D),0.669(Kit B vs Kit C),0.633(Kit B vs Kit D) and 0.565(Kit C vs Kit D)(P<0.01). The positive rates of Kit A,Kit B,Kit C and Kit D were 39.94%,30.50%,31.45% and 18.55%,respectively. There was statistical significance(P<0.05) except for that between Kit B and Kit C(P>0.05). The sensitivity and specificity were 98.2% and 90.4% for Kit A,87.1% and 99.0% for Kit B,82.6% and 95.2% for Kit C,54.1% and 100.0% for Kit D,respectively,and the accuracy of Kit D was lower than those of the other kits(P<0.05). Conclusions The performance of Kit A is consistent with that of Kit B,and Kit A has good sensitivity and accuracy for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid. Kit D is not appropriate for screening corona virus disease 2019(COVID-19) due to its low sensitivity.

Key words: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, Nucleic acid detection, Pharyngeal swab, Comparison, Kit

CLC Number: