检验医学 ›› 2014, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 303-306.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2014.04.001

• 临床应用研究·论著 •    下一篇

宫颈癌与HPV16E6及hWAPL的相关性研究

井发红1,慕玉东2,徐纪茹1,康炜3   

  1. 1.西安交通大学医学院,陕西 西安 710061;2.陕西省肿瘤医院, 陕西 西安 710061;3.西安医学院附属医院,陕西 西安 710077
  • 收稿日期:2013-03-27 出版日期:2014-04-30 发布日期:2014-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 徐纪茹,联系电话:029-82657814。
  • 作者简介:井发红,女,1980年生,硕士,主管技师,主要从事临床微生物学检验工作。

Correlation research of HPV16E6 and hWAPL with cervical cancer

JING Fahong1,MU Yudong2,XU Jiru1,KANG Wei3.   

  1. 1.Xi′an Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanxi Xi′an 710061, China;
    2. The Tumor Hospital of Shanxi Province, Shanxi Xi′an 710061, China;
    3. The Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Medical College, Shanxi Xi′an 710077, China
  • Received:2013-03-27 Online:2014-04-30 Published:2014-06-06

摘要:

目的 检测宫颈不同级别病变组织中人乳头瘤病毒16E6HPV16E6)及人半翼基因(hWAPL)的表达,分析宫颈癌与HPV16E6hWAPL蛋白的相关性,为早期诊断宫颈癌提供依据。方法 采用免疫组化方法检测宫颈不同级别病变组织的石蜡包埋块,其中宫颈上皮细胞内瘤变(CINCIN 49例,CIN 或原位癌33例,宫颈浸润癌(ICC28例,正常宫颈上皮组织16例。结果 HPV16E6hWAPL在正常宫颈组、CIN组、CIN 组和ICC组的组织中阳性表达率呈逐渐增高趋势,HPV16E6hWAPLCIN 组和ICC组的阳性表达率与正常宫颈组、CIN 组差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。CIN 组和ICCHPV16E6蛋白阳性表达率差异有统计学意义(P0.05),而hWAPL蛋白的阳性表达率无明显差异(P0.372)。HPV16E6hWAPL的表达强度在ICC组、CIN组明显高于CIN组和正常宫颈组(P0.05),而ICC组与CIN组之间无明显差异(P>0.05)。64HPV16E6阳性者中57例(89.06%)hWAPL蛋白表达阳性,62例阴性者中15例(24.19%)hWAPL蛋白表达阳性。经统计学处理,二者有明显相关性(P0.05),而且HPV16E6感染强度与hWAPL表达呈正相关(r0.595P0.001)。结论 hWAPL基因是宫颈癌特异性高表达基因,具有癌基因特性,可能是宫颈癌发生机制中的重要环节,而且可能成为新的检测指标,用于宫颈鳞癌的基因诊断、治疗及明确病变程度。

关键词: 人乳头瘤病毒16E6, 人半翼基因, 宫颈癌, 免疫组化

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the expressions of human papillomavirus 16E6 HPV16 E6 and human wings apart-like gene hWAPL in different levels of cervical lesions and the relationship of HPV16E6 and hWAPL protein with cervical cancer and to provide the reference for the early diagnosis of cervical cancer. Methods By immunohistochemistry the paraffin-embedded blocks with different levels of cervical lesions were detected including 49 patients with cervical intraepitelial neoplasia CIN or CIN 33 patients with CIN or carcinoma in situ 28 patients with invasive cervical carcinoma ICC and 16 patients with normal cervical epithelium. Results In normal CIN or CIN and ICC groups the positive expression rates of HPV16E6 and hWAPL showed gradually increasing trend. The positive expression rates of HPV16E6 and hWAPL in CIN and ICC groups had statistical significance with those in normal and CIN or CIN groups P0.05. Between CIN and ICC groups the positive expression rate of HPV16E6 had statistical significance P0.05), but the positive expression rate of hWAPL protein had no obvious difference P0.372. HPV16E6 and hWAPL expression strengthes in ICC group and CIN group were obviously higher than those in CIN or group and normal group P0.05), and there was no obvious difference between ICC and CIN groups P>0.05. The 57 of 64 patients 89.06% with HPV16E6 had the positive expression of hWAPL protein 15 of 62 patients 24.19% with no HPV16E6 had the positive expression of hWAPL protein. By statistical analysis both HPV16E6 and hWAPL protein had significant correlation P0.05), and it showed that the infection intensity of HPV16E6 and the expression of hWAPL had positive correlation r0.595 P0.001. Conclusions The hWAPL may be a cervical cancer-specific gene and expresses highly and it may be important in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer. The hWAPL may become the new target gene for the diagnosis treatment and lesion identification of cervical cancer.

Key words: Human papillomavirus 16 E6, Human wings apart-like gene, Cervical cancer, Immunohistochemistry

中图分类号: