Laboratory Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 779-786.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2024.08.011
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Jing
Received:
2023-09-21
Revised:
2024-03-07
Online:
2024-08-30
Published:
2024-09-02
CLC Number:
ZHANG Jing. Synergistic role of vitamin D and blood glucose in pregnancy outcomes in patients with preeclampsia[J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2024, 39(8): 779-786.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.shjyyx.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2024.08.011
组别 | 例数 | 年龄/岁 | 体重指数/(kg·m-1) | 孕周(≥37周)/[例(%)] | 定期产检 | 吸烟史 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
是/ [例(%)] | 否/ [例(%)] | 有/ [例(%)] | 无/ [例(%)] | |||||
妊娠结局良好组 | 118 | 41.56±1.68 | 25.84±2.56 | 98(83.05) | 117(99.15) | 1(0.85) | 4(3.39) | 114(96.61) |
妊娠结局不良组 | 55 | 42.01±1.24 | 26.72±2.78 | 25(45.45) | 53(96.36) | 2(3.64) | 2(3.64) | 53(96.36) |
统计值 | 1.773 | 2.048 | 43.219 | 1.712 | 0.016 | |||
P值 | 0.078 | 0.042 | <0.001 | 0.191 | 0.898 | |||
组别 | 糖尿病家族史 | 饮酒史 | 孕次/次 | 产次/次 | 流产史 | |||
有/ [例(%)] | 无/ [例(%)] | 有/ [例(%)] | 无/ [例(%)] | 有/ [例(%)] | 无/ [例(%)] | |||
妊娠结局良好组 | 6(5.08) | 112(94.92) | 2(1.69) | 116(98.31) | 2.01±1.25 | 1.04±0.12 | 6(5.08) | 112(94.92) |
妊娠结局不良组 | 3(5.45) | 52(94.55) | 1(1.82) | 54(98.18) | 2.04±1.05 | 1.28±0.24 | 3(5.45) | 52(94.55) |
统计值 | 0.427 | 1.333 | 0.154 | 8.778 | 0.427 | |||
P值 | 0.514 | 0.248 | 0.878 | 0.001 | 0.514 | |||
组别 | 入院时临床症状发生数量 | 入院时血压 | 血红蛋白/(g·L-1) | 肌酐/(μmol·L-1) | PLT计数/(×109·L-1) | 白蛋白/ (g·L-1) | ||
舒张压/kPa | 收缩压/kPa | |||||||
妊娠结局良好组 | 3.12±1.45 | 13.95±2.09 | 20.86±2.74 | 118.69±18.75 | 67.52±16.43 | 149.68±42.32 | 29.76±4.58 | |
妊娠结局不良组 | 5.12±1.65 | 13.56±1.97 | 20.39±2.21 | 120.17±17.94 | 64.65±15.09 | 131.73±37.81 | 30.21±4.95 | |
统计值 | 8.080 | 1.144 | 1.101 | 0.490 | 1.097 | 2.798 | 0.586 | |
P值 | <0.001 | 0.254 | 0.273 | 0.625 | 0.274 | 0.006 | 0.558 | |
组别 | 尿素氮/(mmol·L-1) | 总胆红素/(μmol·L-1) | 乳酸脱氢酶/(U·L-1) | AST/ (U·L-1) | ALT/ (U·L-1) | D-二聚体/(mg·L-1) | Fib/ (g·L-1) | |
妊娠结局良好组 | 6.13±1.95 | 9.12±2.78 | 266.97±34.53 | 37.45±12.29 | 29.03±9.47 | 0.95±0.24 | 3.97±1.14 | |
妊娠结局不良组 | 5.94±1.82 | 8.75±2.54 | 261.98±31.07 | 34.68±11.52 | 27.99±9.24 | 0.68±0.17 | 4.13±1.18 | |
统计值 | 0.609 | 0.837 | 0.913 | 1.408 | 0.678 | 0.438 | 0.850 | |
P值 | 0.543 | 0.404 | 0.363 | 0.161 | 0.499 | 0.662 | 0.396 | |
组别 | APTT/s | 24 h蛋白尿定量/g | 25(OH)D/(ng·mL-1) | 高血糖/ [例(%)] | 治疗方法 | |||
镇静/ [例(%)] | 解痉/ [例(%)] | 降压/ [例(%)] | 其他治疗/[例(%)] | |||||
妊娠结局良好组 | 30.21±2.58 | 2.85±0.73 | 45.03±3.14 | 3(2.54) | 63(53.39) | 72(61.02) | 84(71.19) | 18(15.25) |
妊娠结局不良组 | 29.97±2.35 | 3.58±0.94 | 24.17±3.14 | 35(63.64) | 27(49.09) | 34(61.82) | 42(76.36) | 12(21.82) |
统计值 | 0.586 | 5.086 | 40.690 | 81.690 | 1.067 | |||
P值 | 0.559 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.587 |
组别 | 例数 | 年龄/岁 | 体重指数/(kg·m-1) | 孕周(≥37周)/[例(%)] | 定期产检 | 吸烟史 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
是/ [例(%)] | 否/ [例(%)] | 有/ [例(%)] | 无/ [例(%)] | |||||
妊娠结局良好组 | 118 | 41.56±1.68 | 25.84±2.56 | 98(83.05) | 117(99.15) | 1(0.85) | 4(3.39) | 114(96.61) |
妊娠结局不良组 | 55 | 42.01±1.24 | 26.72±2.78 | 25(45.45) | 53(96.36) | 2(3.64) | 2(3.64) | 53(96.36) |
统计值 | 1.773 | 2.048 | 43.219 | 1.712 | 0.016 | |||
P值 | 0.078 | 0.042 | <0.001 | 0.191 | 0.898 | |||
组别 | 糖尿病家族史 | 饮酒史 | 孕次/次 | 产次/次 | 流产史 | |||
有/ [例(%)] | 无/ [例(%)] | 有/ [例(%)] | 无/ [例(%)] | 有/ [例(%)] | 无/ [例(%)] | |||
妊娠结局良好组 | 6(5.08) | 112(94.92) | 2(1.69) | 116(98.31) | 2.01±1.25 | 1.04±0.12 | 6(5.08) | 112(94.92) |
妊娠结局不良组 | 3(5.45) | 52(94.55) | 1(1.82) | 54(98.18) | 2.04±1.05 | 1.28±0.24 | 3(5.45) | 52(94.55) |
统计值 | 0.427 | 1.333 | 0.154 | 8.778 | 0.427 | |||
P值 | 0.514 | 0.248 | 0.878 | 0.001 | 0.514 | |||
组别 | 入院时临床症状发生数量 | 入院时血压 | 血红蛋白/(g·L-1) | 肌酐/(μmol·L-1) | PLT计数/(×109·L-1) | 白蛋白/ (g·L-1) | ||
舒张压/kPa | 收缩压/kPa | |||||||
妊娠结局良好组 | 3.12±1.45 | 13.95±2.09 | 20.86±2.74 | 118.69±18.75 | 67.52±16.43 | 149.68±42.32 | 29.76±4.58 | |
妊娠结局不良组 | 5.12±1.65 | 13.56±1.97 | 20.39±2.21 | 120.17±17.94 | 64.65±15.09 | 131.73±37.81 | 30.21±4.95 | |
统计值 | 8.080 | 1.144 | 1.101 | 0.490 | 1.097 | 2.798 | 0.586 | |
P值 | <0.001 | 0.254 | 0.273 | 0.625 | 0.274 | 0.006 | 0.558 | |
组别 | 尿素氮/(mmol·L-1) | 总胆红素/(μmol·L-1) | 乳酸脱氢酶/(U·L-1) | AST/ (U·L-1) | ALT/ (U·L-1) | D-二聚体/(mg·L-1) | Fib/ (g·L-1) | |
妊娠结局良好组 | 6.13±1.95 | 9.12±2.78 | 266.97±34.53 | 37.45±12.29 | 29.03±9.47 | 0.95±0.24 | 3.97±1.14 | |
妊娠结局不良组 | 5.94±1.82 | 8.75±2.54 | 261.98±31.07 | 34.68±11.52 | 27.99±9.24 | 0.68±0.17 | 4.13±1.18 | |
统计值 | 0.609 | 0.837 | 0.913 | 1.408 | 0.678 | 0.438 | 0.850 | |
P值 | 0.543 | 0.404 | 0.363 | 0.161 | 0.499 | 0.662 | 0.396 | |
组别 | APTT/s | 24 h蛋白尿定量/g | 25(OH)D/(ng·mL-1) | 高血糖/ [例(%)] | 治疗方法 | |||
镇静/ [例(%)] | 解痉/ [例(%)] | 降压/ [例(%)] | 其他治疗/[例(%)] | |||||
妊娠结局良好组 | 30.21±2.58 | 2.85±0.73 | 45.03±3.14 | 3(2.54) | 63(53.39) | 72(61.02) | 84(71.19) | 18(15.25) |
妊娠结局不良组 | 29.97±2.35 | 3.58±0.94 | 24.17±3.14 | 35(63.64) | 27(49.09) | 34(61.82) | 42(76.36) | 12(21.82) |
统计值 | 0.586 | 5.086 | 40.690 | 81.690 | 1.067 | |||
P值 | 0.559 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.587 |
因素 | β值 | 标准误 | Wald值 | 比值比值(95% CI) | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
体重指数 | 0.523 | 1.501 | 0.121 | 1.687(0.863~2.471) | 0.432 |
孕周 | 0.407 | 0.551 | 0.547 | 1.503(1.259~2.134) | 0.017 |
产次 | 0.355 | 0.155 | 5.249 | 1.426(0.685~2.354) | 0.672 |
入院时临床症状发生数量 | 1.233 | 0.996 | 1.533 | 3.432(3.068~4.054) | 0.002 |
PLT计数 | 0.240 | 0.511 | 0.220 | 1.271(0.597~1.977) | 0.872 |
24 h蛋白尿定量 | 0.518 | 1.013 | 0.262 | 1.679(1.163~2.385) | 0.007 |
25(OH)D | 0.744 | 0.719 | 1.072 | 2.105(1.346~3.362) | 0.004 |
高血糖 | 0.835 | 0.831 | 1.011 | 2.306(1.758~3.316) | 0.023 |
因素 | β值 | 标准误 | Wald值 | 比值比值(95% CI) | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
体重指数 | 0.523 | 1.501 | 0.121 | 1.687(0.863~2.471) | 0.432 |
孕周 | 0.407 | 0.551 | 0.547 | 1.503(1.259~2.134) | 0.017 |
产次 | 0.355 | 0.155 | 5.249 | 1.426(0.685~2.354) | 0.672 |
入院时临床症状发生数量 | 1.233 | 0.996 | 1.533 | 3.432(3.068~4.054) | 0.002 |
PLT计数 | 0.240 | 0.511 | 0.220 | 1.271(0.597~1.977) | 0.872 |
24 h蛋白尿定量 | 0.518 | 1.013 | 0.262 | 1.679(1.163~2.385) | 0.007 |
25(OH)D | 0.744 | 0.719 | 1.072 | 2.105(1.346~3.362) | 0.004 |
高血糖 | 0.835 | 0.831 | 1.011 | 2.306(1.758~3.316) | 0.023 |
概率 | 准确性/% | 敏感性/% | 特异性/% | 假阳性率/% | 假阴性率/% | 约登指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.95 | 76.84 | 89.31 | 74.81 | 65.95 | 2.05 | 0.6412 |
0.90 | 84.34 | 86.12 | 84.21 | 56.34 | 2.27 | 0.7033 |
0.85 | 86.92 | 85.71 | 87.61 | 48.51 | 2.37 | 0.7332 |
0.80 | 90.10 | 78.92 | 93.84 | 42.12 | 3.24 | 0.7276 |
0.75 | 92.41 | 73.67 | 94.51 | 30.51 | 3.73 | 0.6818 |
0.70 | 91.80 | 71.55 | 94.85 | 31.21 | 4.03 | 0.6640 |
0.65 | 93.36 | 70.91 | 95.41 | 26.95 | 4.53 | 0.6632 |
0.60 | 92.63 | 67.82 | 96.04 | 27.85 | 4.95 | 0.6386 |
0.55 | 93.71 | 66.51 | 96.72 | 19.66 | 4.61 | 0.6323 |
0.50 | 93.05 | 60.65 | 97.84 | 21.44 | 5.51 | 0.5849 |
0.45 | 93.44 | 58.22 | 98.12 | 15.84 | 5.81 | 0.5634 |
0.40 | 93.15 | 56.47 | 98.51 | 16.53 | 5.98 | 0.5498 |
0.35 | 93.51 | 50.92 | 99.03 | 6.58 | 6.55 | 0.4995 |
0.30 | 92.93 | 48.47 | 99.21 | 7.06 | 7.06 | 0.4768 |
0.25 | 93.24 | 48.22 | 99.51 | 3.26 | 6.94 | 0.4773 |
0.20 | 92.78 | 45.62 | 99.84 | 3.86 | 7.47 | 0.4546 |
0.15 | 90.56 | 30.22 | 99.82 | 5.55 | 9.05 | 0.3004 |
0.10 | 88.63 | 16.84 | 100.00 | 0 | 10.85 | 0.1684 |
0.05 | 87.37 | 0 | 100.00 | 0 | 12.53 | 0 |
概率 | 准确性/% | 敏感性/% | 特异性/% | 假阳性率/% | 假阴性率/% | 约登指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.95 | 76.84 | 89.31 | 74.81 | 65.95 | 2.05 | 0.6412 |
0.90 | 84.34 | 86.12 | 84.21 | 56.34 | 2.27 | 0.7033 |
0.85 | 86.92 | 85.71 | 87.61 | 48.51 | 2.37 | 0.7332 |
0.80 | 90.10 | 78.92 | 93.84 | 42.12 | 3.24 | 0.7276 |
0.75 | 92.41 | 73.67 | 94.51 | 30.51 | 3.73 | 0.6818 |
0.70 | 91.80 | 71.55 | 94.85 | 31.21 | 4.03 | 0.6640 |
0.65 | 93.36 | 70.91 | 95.41 | 26.95 | 4.53 | 0.6632 |
0.60 | 92.63 | 67.82 | 96.04 | 27.85 | 4.95 | 0.6386 |
0.55 | 93.71 | 66.51 | 96.72 | 19.66 | 4.61 | 0.6323 |
0.50 | 93.05 | 60.65 | 97.84 | 21.44 | 5.51 | 0.5849 |
0.45 | 93.44 | 58.22 | 98.12 | 15.84 | 5.81 | 0.5634 |
0.40 | 93.15 | 56.47 | 98.51 | 16.53 | 5.98 | 0.5498 |
0.35 | 93.51 | 50.92 | 99.03 | 6.58 | 6.55 | 0.4995 |
0.30 | 92.93 | 48.47 | 99.21 | 7.06 | 7.06 | 0.4768 |
0.25 | 93.24 | 48.22 | 99.51 | 3.26 | 6.94 | 0.4773 |
0.20 | 92.78 | 45.62 | 99.84 | 3.86 | 7.47 | 0.4546 |
0.15 | 90.56 | 30.22 | 99.82 | 5.55 | 9.05 | 0.3004 |
0.10 | 88.63 | 16.84 | 100.00 | 0 | 10.85 | 0.1684 |
0.05 | 87.37 | 0 | 100.00 | 0 | 12.53 | 0 |
因素1 (血糖) | + | 因素2 [25(OH)D] | 单因素非条件Logistic回归分析 | 多因素非条件Logistic回归分析 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
比值比值(95%可信区间) | P值 | 比值比值(95%可信区间) | P值 | ||||
无 | + | 无 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||
有 | + | 无 | 1.893(1.072~2.763) | 0.013 | 1.573(0.974~2.783) | 0.046 | |
无 | + | 有 | 2.574(1.633~4.921) | 0.000 | 1.824(1.295~2.514) | 0.035 | |
有 | + | 有 | 6.593(2.235~21.604) | 0.001 | 5.613(1.548~18.629) | 0.003 |
因素1 (血糖) | + | 因素2 [25(OH)D] | 单因素非条件Logistic回归分析 | 多因素非条件Logistic回归分析 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
比值比值(95%可信区间) | P值 | 比值比值(95%可信区间) | P值 | ||||
无 | + | 无 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||
有 | + | 无 | 1.893(1.072~2.763) | 0.013 | 1.573(0.974~2.783) | 0.046 | |
无 | + | 有 | 2.574(1.633~4.921) | 0.000 | 1.824(1.295~2.514) | 0.035 | |
有 | + | 有 | 6.593(2.235~21.604) | 0.001 | 5.613(1.548~18.629) | 0.003 |
项目 | 单因素 | 多因素 |
---|---|---|
交互作用指数 | 2.27 | 3.30 |
交互作用超额相对危险度 | 3.13 | 3.22 |
归因比 | 43.41 | 57.30 |
纯因子间归因交互效应百分率 | 55.89 | 69.72 |
项目 | 单因素 | 多因素 |
---|---|---|
交互作用指数 | 2.27 | 3.30 |
交互作用超额相对危险度 | 3.13 | 3.22 |
归因比 | 43.41 | 57.30 |
纯因子间归因交互效应百分率 | 55.89 | 69.72 |
[1] | 陈志萍, 黄丽珊, 吴明秀, 等. 子痫前期患者血清miR-17 miR-25表达的临床意义及对妊娠结局的影响[J]. 河北医学, 2022, 28(8):1344-1348. |
[2] | 袁里朝, 汤旭妮, 郑秀娟. 子痫前期合并胎儿生长受限患者糖脂代谢状况及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2023, 38(8):1385-1388. |
[3] |
GUBENSEK J, PONIKVAR R, PREMRU SRSEN T, et al. Therapeutic plasma exchange and dextran-sulfate plasma adsorption as extracorporeal treatments of extremely preterm preeclampsia with fetal growth restriction[J]. J Clin Apher, 2021, 36(4):595-605.
DOI PMID |
[4] | 中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组. 妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2020)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2020, 55(4):227-238. |
[5] | 廖祥鹏, 张增利, 张红红, 等. 维生素D与成年人骨骼健康应用指南(2014年标准版)[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2014, 20(9):1011-1030. |
[6] | BOUTET M L, CASALS G, VALENZUELA-ALCARAZ B, et al. Cardiac remodeling in fetuses conceived by ARTs:fresh versus frozen embryo transfer[J]. Hum Reprod, 2021, 36(10):2697-2708. |
[7] | NUNES P R, ROMAO-VEIGA M, RIBEIRO V R, et al. COVID-19:a new risk factor or just a new imitator of preeclampsia? NLRP3 activation:a possible common mechanism[J]. J Med Virol, 2022, 94(5):1813-1814. |
[8] | GIBBONE E, HULUTA I, WRIGHT A, et al. Maternal cardiac function at midgestation and development of preeclampsia[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2022, 79(1):52-62. |
[9] | YANG Y, LE RAY I, ZHU J, et al. Preeclampsia prevalence,risk factors,and pregnancy outcomes in Sweden and China[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2021, 4(5):e218401. |
[10] |
SIDDIQUE N, COX B. Computational analysis identified accelerated senescence as a significant contribution to preeclampsia pathophysiology[J]. Placenta, 2022, 121:70-78.
DOI PMID |
[11] | SEDOR J R, BRUGGEMAN L A, O'TOOLE J F. APOL1 and preeclampsia:intriguing links,uncertain causality,troubling implications[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2021, 77(6):863-865. |
[12] | TAN L, CHEN Z, SUN F, et al. Placental trophoblast-specific overexpression of chemerin induces preeclampsia-like symptoms[J]. Clin Sci(Lond), 2022, 136(4):257-272. |
[13] | PYEVICH M, ALEXANDER L M, STANHEWICZ A E. Women with a history of preeclampsia have preserved sensory nerve-mediated dilatation in the cutaneous microvasculature[J]. Exp Physiol, 2022, 107(2):175-182. |
[14] | DUVEKOT J J, DUIJNHOVEN R G, VAN HOREN E, et al. Temporizing management vs immediate delivery in early-onset severe preeclampsia between 28 and 34 weeks of gestation(TOTEM study):an open-label randomized controlled trial[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2021, 100(1):109-118. |
[15] | 乔小改, 蔡大军, 张庆. 载脂蛋白B/A1比值对子痫前期患者妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2022, 31(8):597-600. |
[16] | 于艳, 白青山, 才蔚涛, 等. 血清微小核糖核酸-4286与幽门螺旋杆菌感染的子痫前期患者妊娠结局的关系[J]. 生物医学工程与临床, 2022, 26(6):755-760. |
[17] | 林雪燕, 杨孜, 史峻梅, 等. 不同转诊时机对转诊系统内重度子痫前期孕妇妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2022, 57(3):164-171. |
[18] | 郑雯, 张亚莉. 子痫前期患者血清BNP、miR-124与病情及妊娠结局关系[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2022, 30(1):155-159. |
[1] | CHEN Haiying, GE Yafang, PAN Shun, YANG Haiou. Clinical value of inflammatory derived indicators and cystatin C in preeclampsia [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2024, 39(6): 557-561. |
[2] | ZHAO Yanan, XIAO Weili, CAO Qixin, YAN Yan, CUI Xiuge, ZHAO Jianping. Relation of drug resistance,serotypes and genotypes of Group B Streptococcus in perinatal pregnant females and pregnancy outcomes [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2024, 39(4): 382-386. |
[3] | LIU Mengzhu, GU Jinyun, ZHU Xia, CHEN Xia. Predictive value of glucose variability parameters before delivery for macrosomia in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2024, 39(3): 215-221. |
[4] | DUAN Yuping, XIE Li, CAI Leiming, WU Jingjing, HONG Mao, LI Qian. Correlation of serum exosomes,placental exosomes and exosomal miR-210 with preeclampsia [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 37(8): 715-719. |
[5] | LIU Yang, GENG Kunjing, LI Hongjiang, SHI Haoxi, CHEN Sisi. Relationship of 25(OH)D3 and liver inflammatory stage with the efficacy of antiviral therapy [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 37(7): 628-631. |
[6] | ZHANG Zhibin, YANG Wanyong, RUAN Fuwang, WEN Qinghui. Roles of total IgE,sIgE and 25(OH)D in the evaluation of infant atopic dermatitis [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 37(3): 217-220. |
[7] | ZHAO Xiaomin, JIANG Xiaoyu, SHAN Kaili, SHAN Tieying, LIU Xiuzhen. Roles of Flt-3L,TF and 25(OH)D in iron deficiency anemia among infants and children [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 37(11): 1039-1043. |
[8] | LI Dingfu, HUANG Jian, CAI Meiling, WANG Lizhen, JIAN Kaigan, YANG Feifei. Relationship between serum 25(OH)D and disease control in children with allergic rhinitis-asthma syndrome [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 37(1): 32-35. |
[9] | ZHAO Xueling, ZHENG Xin, XU Huamei, SHI Hongyao. Correlation between serum 25(OH)D,specific IgE and VAS score in children with allergic rhinitis [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2021, 36(6): 615-617. |
[10] | CHEN Xingyu, DONG Feifei. Correlation between fasting blood glucose variability parameters and painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2021, 36(3): 285-291. |
[11] | LI Bingling, CHENG Yating, ZHAO Beibei, SHE Xuhui, DONG Heng, YU Mujun. Evaluation of surrogate matrices for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D calibrators by LC-MS/MS [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2021, 36(2): 213-218. |
[12] | FANG Huiling, GE Danhong, ZHU Yuqing, ZHU Lingfeng, ZHAO Xiaojun, CHEN Ziqi, WANG Zimeng. Analysis on the external quality assessment results for 25-hydroxyvitamin D of Shanghai from 2015 to 2019 [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2021, 36(2): 219-224. |
[13] | CHEN Gang, WANG Jing, DENG Qiang, CHEN Xi, HU Dong, ZHUANG Lidong. Correlation and risk assessment of serum 25(OH)D level and multiple thyroid function indicators in patients with thyroid cancer before operation [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2020, 35(9): 885-888. |
[14] | XU Zhen, MA Lijuan, WU Siyi, WANG Yan, JIA Keke. Predictive role of serum fibronectin level in the second trimester of pregnancy for patients with gestational diabetes mellitus complicated with preeclampsia [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2020, 35(6): 561-565. |
[15] | CAO Zheng, DONG Ying, ZHAO Shenglong, WANG Jing, ZHANG Chunhong, CHEN Lu, LIU Jingrui, SHEN Min, ZHAI Yanhong, LIU Xiaowei. Utility of non-targeted lipidomics in predicting preeclampsia [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2020, 35(2): 100-107. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||