Laboratory Medicine ›› 2021, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 800-804.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2021.08.004
Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Yanchun, TIAN Bin, YUE Na, HU Zhidong()
Received:
2020-12-30
Online:
2021-08-30
Published:
2021-08-30
Contact:
HU Zhidong
CLC Number:
LI Yanchun, TIAN Bin, YUE Na, HU Zhidong. Analysis for distribution and drug resistance of fungemia pathogen from 2014 to 2020 in a Tianjin hospital[J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2021, 36(8): 800-804.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.shjyyx.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2021.08.004
年份 | 病原菌总检出率 | 真菌检出率 | 真菌所占比例 |
---|---|---|---|
2014年 | 8.05 | 0.80 | 9.93 |
2015年 | 9.43 | 1.14 | 12.10 |
2016年 | 7.83 | 1.18 | 15.10 |
2017年 | 8.25 | 0.87 | 10.50 |
2018年 | 9.00 | 0.56 | 6.18 |
2019年 | 8.76 | 0.92 | 9.98 |
2020年 | 9.02 | 1.05 | 10.43 |
合计 | 8.62 | 0.93 | 10.60 |
年份 | 病原菌总检出率 | 真菌检出率 | 真菌所占比例 |
---|---|---|---|
2014年 | 8.05 | 0.80 | 9.93 |
2015年 | 9.43 | 1.14 | 12.10 |
2016年 | 7.83 | 1.18 | 15.10 |
2017年 | 8.25 | 0.87 | 10.50 |
2018年 | 9.00 | 0.56 | 6.18 |
2019年 | 8.76 | 0.92 | 9.98 |
2020年 | 9.02 | 1.05 | 10.43 |
合计 | 8.62 | 0.93 | 10.60 |
年份 | 近平滑念珠菌 | 白念珠菌 | 热带念珠菌 | 光滑念珠菌 | 克柔念珠菌 | 希木龙念珠菌 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014年 | 26(49.63) | 8(14.04) | 7(12.28) | 1(1.75) | 2(3.51) | 1(1.75) | |
2015年 | 33(47.83) | 8(11.59) | 10(14.49) | 6(8.70) | 0(0) | 3(4.34) | |
2016年 | 29(52.73) | 5(9.09) | 3(5.45) | 6(10.91) | 1(1.82) | 0(0) | |
2017年 | 22(44.00) | 11(22.00) | 4(8.00) | 6(12.00) | 2(4.00) | 0(0) | |
2018年 | 22(46.81) | 8(17.02) | 4(8.51) | 6(12.77) | 1(2.13) | 0(0) | |
2019年 | 34(56.67) | 6(10.00) | 4(6.67) | 7(11.67) | 1(1.67) | 1(1.67) | |
2020年 | 33(52.38) | 16(25.40) | 5(7.94) | 5(7.94) | 1(1.59) | 0(0) | |
合计 | 199(49.63) | 62(15.46) | 37(9.23) | 37(9.23) | 8(2.00) | 5(1.25) | |
年份 | 溶脂念珠菌 | 酿酒念珠菌 | 薄膜念珠菌 | 红酵母属 | 新生隐球菌 | 罗伦特隐球菌 | 合计 |
2014年 | 1(1.75) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 5(8.77) | 2(3.51) | 4(7.02) | 57(100) |
2015年 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 4(5.79) | 2(2.90) | 3(4.35) | 69(100) |
2016年 | 1(1.82) | 0(0) | 1(1.82) | 4(7.27) | 4(7.27) | 1(1.82) | 55(100) |
2017年 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 5(10.00) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 50(100) |
2018年 | 0(0) | 1(2.13) | 0(0) | 1(2.13) | 4(8.51) | 0(0) | 47(100) |
2019年 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(1.67) | 3(5.00) | 3(5.00) | 0(0) | 60(100) |
2020年 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(1.59) | 0(0) | 2(3.17) | 0(0) | 63(100) |
合计 | 2(0.50) | 1(0.25) | 3(0.75) | 22(5.49) | 17(4.24) | 8(2.00) | 401(100) |
年份 | 近平滑念珠菌 | 白念珠菌 | 热带念珠菌 | 光滑念珠菌 | 克柔念珠菌 | 希木龙念珠菌 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014年 | 26(49.63) | 8(14.04) | 7(12.28) | 1(1.75) | 2(3.51) | 1(1.75) | |
2015年 | 33(47.83) | 8(11.59) | 10(14.49) | 6(8.70) | 0(0) | 3(4.34) | |
2016年 | 29(52.73) | 5(9.09) | 3(5.45) | 6(10.91) | 1(1.82) | 0(0) | |
2017年 | 22(44.00) | 11(22.00) | 4(8.00) | 6(12.00) | 2(4.00) | 0(0) | |
2018年 | 22(46.81) | 8(17.02) | 4(8.51) | 6(12.77) | 1(2.13) | 0(0) | |
2019年 | 34(56.67) | 6(10.00) | 4(6.67) | 7(11.67) | 1(1.67) | 1(1.67) | |
2020年 | 33(52.38) | 16(25.40) | 5(7.94) | 5(7.94) | 1(1.59) | 0(0) | |
合计 | 199(49.63) | 62(15.46) | 37(9.23) | 37(9.23) | 8(2.00) | 5(1.25) | |
年份 | 溶脂念珠菌 | 酿酒念珠菌 | 薄膜念珠菌 | 红酵母属 | 新生隐球菌 | 罗伦特隐球菌 | 合计 |
2014年 | 1(1.75) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 5(8.77) | 2(3.51) | 4(7.02) | 57(100) |
2015年 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 4(5.79) | 2(2.90) | 3(4.35) | 69(100) |
2016年 | 1(1.82) | 0(0) | 1(1.82) | 4(7.27) | 4(7.27) | 1(1.82) | 55(100) |
2017年 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 5(10.00) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 50(100) |
2018年 | 0(0) | 1(2.13) | 0(0) | 1(2.13) | 4(8.51) | 0(0) | 47(100) |
2019年 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(1.67) | 3(5.00) | 3(5.00) | 0(0) | 60(100) |
2020年 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(1.59) | 0(0) | 2(3.17) | 0(0) | 63(100) |
合计 | 2(0.50) | 1(0.25) | 3(0.75) | 22(5.49) | 17(4.24) | 8(2.00) | 401(100) |
病原菌 | 菌株数 | 5-氟胞嘧啶 | 氟康唑 | 伏立康唑 | 伊曲康唑 | 两性霉素B* | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
敏感 | 中介 | 耐药 | 敏感 | 剂量依赖型 敏感 | 耐药 | 敏感 | 剂量依赖型 敏感 | 耐药 | 敏感 | 剂量依赖型 敏感 | 耐药 | 敏感 | 耐药 | ||||||
近平滑念珠菌 | 199 | 89.95 | 9.55 | 0.50 | 94.47 | 3.02 | 2.51 | 95.98 | 2.01 | 2.01 | 91.46 | 6.03 | 2.51 | 100 | 0 | ||||
白念珠菌 | 62 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 93.55 | 1.61 | 4.84 | 91.94 | 1.61 | 6.45 | 83.87 | 8.06 | 8.06 | 100 | 0 | ||||
热带念珠菌 | 37 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 48.65 | 16.21 | 35.14 | 62.16 | 5.41 | 32.43 | 27.03 | 27.03 | 45.95 | 100 | 0 | ||||
光滑念珠菌 | 37 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 75.68 | 16.22 | 8.11 | 91.89 | 2.70 | 5.41 | 43.24 | 24.32 | 32.43 | 100 | 0 | ||||
克柔念珠菌 | 8 | 75.00 | 25.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 62.50 | 25.00 | 12.50 | 100 | 0 | ||||
希木龙念珠菌 | 5 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 60.00 | 40.00 | ||||
溶脂念珠菌 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 | 0 | ||||
酿酒念珠菌 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | ||||
薄膜念珠菌 | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | ||||
红酵母属 | 22 | 90.91 | 9.09 | 0 | 27.27 | 36.36 | 36.36 | 63.64 | 13.64 | 22.73 | 18.18 | 9.09 | 72.73 | 95.45 | 4.55 | ||||
新生隐球菌 | 17 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 82.35 | 17.65 | 0 | 100 | 0 | ||||
罗伦特隐球菌 | 8 | 87.50 | 12.50 | 0 | 50.00 | 37.50 | 12.50 | 75.00 | 12.50 | 12.50 | 37.50 | 25.00 | 37.50 | 100 | 0 | ||||
合计 | 401 | 93.77 | 5.99 | 0.25 | 81.05 | 7.48 | 11.47 | 88.78 | 2.99 | 8.23 | 71.57 | 11.47 | 16.96 | 99.25 | 0.75 |
病原菌 | 菌株数 | 5-氟胞嘧啶 | 氟康唑 | 伏立康唑 | 伊曲康唑 | 两性霉素B* | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
敏感 | 中介 | 耐药 | 敏感 | 剂量依赖型 敏感 | 耐药 | 敏感 | 剂量依赖型 敏感 | 耐药 | 敏感 | 剂量依赖型 敏感 | 耐药 | 敏感 | 耐药 | ||||||
近平滑念珠菌 | 199 | 89.95 | 9.55 | 0.50 | 94.47 | 3.02 | 2.51 | 95.98 | 2.01 | 2.01 | 91.46 | 6.03 | 2.51 | 100 | 0 | ||||
白念珠菌 | 62 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 93.55 | 1.61 | 4.84 | 91.94 | 1.61 | 6.45 | 83.87 | 8.06 | 8.06 | 100 | 0 | ||||
热带念珠菌 | 37 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 48.65 | 16.21 | 35.14 | 62.16 | 5.41 | 32.43 | 27.03 | 27.03 | 45.95 | 100 | 0 | ||||
光滑念珠菌 | 37 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 75.68 | 16.22 | 8.11 | 91.89 | 2.70 | 5.41 | 43.24 | 24.32 | 32.43 | 100 | 0 | ||||
克柔念珠菌 | 8 | 75.00 | 25.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 62.50 | 25.00 | 12.50 | 100 | 0 | ||||
希木龙念珠菌 | 5 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 60.00 | 40.00 | ||||
溶脂念珠菌 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 | 0 | ||||
酿酒念珠菌 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | ||||
薄膜念珠菌 | 3 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | ||||
红酵母属 | 22 | 90.91 | 9.09 | 0 | 27.27 | 36.36 | 36.36 | 63.64 | 13.64 | 22.73 | 18.18 | 9.09 | 72.73 | 95.45 | 4.55 | ||||
新生隐球菌 | 17 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 82.35 | 17.65 | 0 | 100 | 0 | ||||
罗伦特隐球菌 | 8 | 87.50 | 12.50 | 0 | 50.00 | 37.50 | 12.50 | 75.00 | 12.50 | 12.50 | 37.50 | 25.00 | 37.50 | 100 | 0 | ||||
合计 | 401 | 93.77 | 5.99 | 0.25 | 81.05 | 7.48 | 11.47 | 88.78 | 2.99 | 8.23 | 71.57 | 11.47 | 16.96 | 99.25 | 0.75 |
病原菌 | 菌株数 | 5-氟胞嘧啶 | 氟康唑 | 伏立康唑 | 伊曲康唑 | 两性霉素B | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIC50 | MIC90 | MIC50 | MIC90 | MIC50 | MIC90 | MIC50 | MIC90 | MIC50 | MIC90 | ||||||
近平滑念珠菌 | 199 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 0.064 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
白念珠菌 | 62 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0.064 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
热带念珠菌 | 37 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 128 | 0.5 | 8 | 0.5 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
光滑念珠菌 | 37 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 128 | 0.25 | 1 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
克柔念珠菌 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.125 | 16 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
希木龙念珠菌 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 128 | 128 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 16 | ||||
溶脂念珠菌 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
酿酒念珠菌 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
薄膜念珠菌 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
红酵母属 | 22 | 4 | 16 | 32 | 128 | 0.5 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
新生隐球菌 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 2 | ||||
罗伦特隐球菌 | 8 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 128 | 0.5 | 8 | 0.25 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
病原菌 | 菌株数 | 5-氟胞嘧啶 | 氟康唑 | 伏立康唑 | 伊曲康唑 | 两性霉素B | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIC50 | MIC90 | MIC50 | MIC90 | MIC50 | MIC90 | MIC50 | MIC90 | MIC50 | MIC90 | ||||||
近平滑念珠菌 | 199 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 0.064 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
白念珠菌 | 62 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0.064 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
热带念珠菌 | 37 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 128 | 0.5 | 8 | 0.5 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
光滑念珠菌 | 37 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 128 | 0.25 | 1 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
克柔念珠菌 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.125 | 16 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
希木龙念珠菌 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 128 | 128 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 16 | ||||
溶脂念珠菌 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
酿酒念珠菌 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
薄膜念珠菌 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
红酵母属 | 22 | 4 | 16 | 32 | 128 | 0.5 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
新生隐球菌 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 2 | ||||
罗伦特隐球菌 | 8 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 128 | 0.5 | 8 | 0.25 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
[1] |
DE PAUW B, WALSH T J, DONNELLY J P, et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group(EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2008, 46(12):1813-1821.
DOI URL |
[2] |
VIJAYAKUMAR R, GIRI S, KINDO A J. Molecular species identification of Candida from blood samples of intensive care unit patients by polymerase chain reaction-restricted fragment length polymorphism[J]. J Lab Physicians, 2012, 4(1):1-4.
DOI URL |
[3] | Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts[S]. M27-A2,CLSI, 2002. |
[4] | Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts[S]. M27-S4,CLSI, 2012. |
[5] |
PFALLER M A, DIEKEMA D J. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis:a persistent public health problem[J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2007, 20(1):133-163.
DOI URL |
[6] | GUINEA J. Global trends in the distribution of Candida species causing candidemia[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2014, 20(Suppl 6):5-10. |
[7] |
PFALLER M A, DIEKEMA D J, GIBBS D L, et al. Results from the ARTEMIS DISK global antifungal surveillance study,1997 to 2005:an 8.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of Candida species and other yeast species to fluconazole and voriconazole determined by CLSI standardized disk diffusion testing[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2007, 45(6):1735-1745.
DOI URL |
[8] |
PFALLER M A, DIEKEMA D J, GIBBS D L, et al. Results from the ARTEMIS DISK global antifungal surveillance study,1997 to 2007:a 10.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of Candida species to fluconazole and voriconazole as determined by CLSI standardized disk diffusion[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2010, 48(4):1366-1377.
DOI URL |
[9] |
PFALLER M A, DIEKEMA D J, JONES R N, et al. Trends in antifungal susceptibility of Candida spp. isolated from pediatric and adult patients with bloodstream infections:SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program,1997 to 2000[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2002, 40(3):852-856.
DOI URL |
[10] |
LORTHOLARY O, DESNOS-OLLIVIER M, SITBON K, et al. Recent exposure to caspofungin or fluconazole influences the epidemiology of candidemia:a prospective multicenter study involving 2 441 patients[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2011, 55(2):532-538.
DOI URL |
[11] | XIAO M, SUN Z Y, KANG M, et al. Five-year national surveillance of invasive candidiasis:species distribution and azole susceptibility from the China Hospital Invasive Fungal Surveillance Net(CHIF-NET) Study[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2018, 56(7):e00577-18. |
[12] |
XIAO M, CHEN S C, KONG F, et al. Five-year China Hospital Invasive Fungal Surveillance Net(CHIF-NET) study of invasive fungal infections caused by noncandidal yeasts:species distribution and azole susceptibility[J]. Infect Drug Resist, 2018, 11:1659-1667.
DOI URL |
[13] | PFALLER M A, DIEKEMA D J, TURNIDGE J D, et al. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program:results for Candida species from 1997-2016[J]. Open Forum Infect Dis, 2019, 6(Suppl 1):S79-S94. |
[14] |
CHATZINIKOLAOU I, RAAD I I. Intravascular catheter-related infections:a preventable challenge in the critically ill[J]. Semin Respir Infect, 2000, 15(4):264-271.
DOI URL |
[15] |
EPELBAUM O, CHASAN R. Candidemia in the intensive care unit[J]. Clin Chest Med, 2017, 38(3):493-509.
DOI URL |
[16] |
CASTANHEIRA M, MESSER S A, RHOMBERG P R, et al. Antifungal susceptibility patterns of a global collection of fungal isolates:results of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program(2013)[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2016, 85(2):200-204.
DOI URL |
[17] |
FERNÁNDEZ-RUIZ M, GUINEA J, PUIG-ASENSIO M, et al. Fungemia due to rare opportunistic yeasts:data from a population-based surveillance in Spain[J]. Med Mycol, 2017, 55(2):125-136.
DOI URL |
[18] |
LIN S Y, LU P L, TAN B H, et al. The epidemiology of non-Candida yeasts isolated from blood:the Asia surveillance study[J]. Mycoses, 2019, 62(2):112-120.
DOI URL |
[1] | WANG Chao, ZHAO Yu. Research progress on formation mechanism and eradication strategy of bacterial persisters [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(8): 790-795. |
[2] | ZHU Yurong, ZHANG Dan, HE Yaxing, LI Jingjing, HUANG Jing, LI Ting, LIU Peng, LIU Ronghua. Classification and epidemiology characteristics of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from clinic [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(5): 435-440. |
[3] | FANG Yongmei, ZHANG Yan, XU Xueying, ZHONG Feng. Correlation of Staphylococcus aureus drug resistance with drug resistance genes and virulence genes [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(4): 357-361. |
[4] | WANG Jiawei, ZHU Weinan, CHEN Yingying, JI Ping, WANG Ying. Clinical characteristics,molecular typing and drug resistance genes of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from blood culturing [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(4): 362-367. |
[5] | REN Yanfei, ZHANG Min, YANG Tao, LI Rongkai, LIANG Xin. Analysis of pathogenic epidemiology of patients with lower respiratory tract infection in respiratory intensive care unit [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(2): 157-162. |
[6] | DENG Chen, DAI Jiaze, QIU Lihong, SHEN Weiting, CAI Mufa, LUO Wenying. Molecular epidemic characteristics of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in Zhanjiang [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(11): 1026-1031. |
[7] | RU Haohao, CHEN Lianyong, YANG Xing, CHEN Tao, YAN Shuangqun, XU Lin. Analysis of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis determined by Xpert MTB/RIF and phenotypic drug susceptibility test [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(11): 1032-1035. |
[8] | WANG Su, DING Li, JIANG Wenrong, MIAO Yingxin, ZHANG Yanmei, ZHAO Hu. Research progress on drug resistance and treatment strategies of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(1): 81-86. |
[9] | HAO Jiahui, YANG Zehua. Research progress of bacterial integron determination methods [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 37(9): 887-891. |
[10] | CHEN Hanlu, WU Shenghai. Influence factors of blood culture negative results and progress of pathogen detection in bloodstream infection [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 37(7): 688-694. |
[11] | LI Hua, WANG Weiliang, XIE Bei, YANG Yu, MENG Fanrong, WANG Nan, LIU Zhihui, ZHANG Yanbin. Feasibility of the determination of heterogeneous drug resistance to rifampicin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis by flow cytometry [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 37(6): 577-582. |
[12] | SUN Xiaodan, LIU Yiwen, HE Yiqing, DU Yan, ZHANG Guoliang, GAO Feng, YANG Cuixia. Research progress on the role of estrogen receptor in osteosarcoma [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 37(4): 313-318. |
[13] | WANG Jianying, WANG Shanshan, ZHU Jun, HUANG Xiaochun, WAN Yuxiang, LIU Yun. Distribution and drug resistance of respiratory infection pathogens in patients with lung cancer after chemotherapy [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 37(4): 356-359. |
[14] | CHU Minjun, LI Xiaojuan, HUANG Hailin, LI Jue, MA Mingbiao, DU Tingyi, WANG Haiping. Influence of delayed entry on fastidious bacterium culture in 2 blood culture systems [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 37(3): 209-212. |
[15] | SUN Ying, LI Yi, YAN Wenjuan, JING Nan, MA Bing. Analysis of drug resistance of rare CRE and clinical application of carbapenem screening test in Henan [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 37(2): 146-149. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||