检验医学 ›› 2013, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 391-395.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2013.05.011

• 临床应用研究.论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

胰岛素样生长因子1及其结合蛋白3对胃癌诊断的意义

彭冲,孙桂荣   

  1. 青岛大学医学院附属医院检验科,山东 青岛 266003
  • 收稿日期:2012-10-18 修回日期:2013-01-07 出版日期:2013-05-15 发布日期:2013-05-14
  • 通讯作者: 孙桂荣,联系电话:0532-82911773。
  • 作者简介:彭冲,男,1987年生,硕士,主要从事临床免疫学研究。

The significance of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 in the diagnosis of gastric cancer

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory,the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Medical College,Shandong Qingdao 266003,China
  • Received:2012-10-18 Revised:2013-01-07 Online:2013-05-15 Published:2013-05-14

摘要: 目的 评估血清胰岛素样生长因子-1(IGF-1)及胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白-3(IGFBP-3)对胃癌及胃癌前病变的临床诊断价值。方法 采用化学发光法、酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和电化学发光法对90例胃癌患者、40例胃良性疾病患者和50名健康体检者血清IGF-1、IGFBP-3、癌胚抗原(CEA)和糖类抗原199(CA199)水平进行检测。 结果 胃癌组血清IGF-1水平明显高于胃良性疾病组和健康对照组(P<0.05、P<0.001),血清IGFBP-3水平明显低于胃良性疾病组和健康对照组(P<0.001);胃癌早期(Ⅰ~Ⅱ期)组血清IGF-1水平虽明显低于胃癌晚期(Ⅲ~Ⅳ期)组,但高于健康对照组;IGFBP-3水平虽高于胃癌晚期组,但也低于健康对照组。血清IGF-1与IGFBP-3呈明显负相关,直线相关方程为Y =-0.33X+116.65(r=-0.566,P<0.01);血清IGF-1、IGFBP-3与CEA、CA199均无相关性。以健康对照组为对照绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,IGF-1的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)明显高于CEA和CA199(P<0.01、P<0.05),诊断胃癌的敏感性亦高于CEA和CA199(P<0.05)。 结论 IGF-1对胃癌的诊断价值优于CEA和CA199,且有助于胃癌分期的评估。

关键词: 胰岛素样生长因子-1, 胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白-3, 胃癌, 胃癌前病变

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the clinical significance of serum insulin-like growth factor-1(IGF-1) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3(IGFBP-3) in the diagnosis of gastric cancer and gastric precancerous lesion. Methods The serum levels of IGF-1,IGFBP-3,carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 199(CA199) were measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay,enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) and electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay in 90 patients with gastric cancer,40 patients with gastric benign disease and 50 healthy subjects. Results The serum levels of IGF-1 in patients with gastric cancer were significantly higher than those in patients with gastric benign disease and healthy subjects(P<0.05,P<0.001). The serum levels of IGFBP-3 in patients with gastric cancer were significantly lower than those in patients with gastric benign disease and healthy subjects(P<0.001).The serum levels of IGF-1 in the early (Ⅰ-Ⅱ) stage of gastric cancer were lower than those in the late (Ⅲ-Ⅳ) stage, but were higher than those in the healthy subjects,and the serum levels of IGFBP-3 were higher than those in the late stage, but were lower than those in the healthy subjects.The serum levels of IGF-1 had significantly negative correlation with IGFBP-3,and the linear correlation equation was Y =-0.33X +116.65(r=-0.566,P<0.01). There was no correlation between IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 with CEA and CA199. Using the healthy subjects as controls,the areas under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve (AUC) of IGF-1  was obviously higher than those of CEA and CA199(P<0.01,P<0.05). The sensitivity of IGF-1 for the diagnosis of gastric cancer was higher than those of CEA and CA199(P<0.05). Conclusions IGF-1 is better than CEA and CA199, in the diagnosis of gastric cancer,and it is helpful for the evaluation of gastric cancer stages.

Key words: Insulin-like growth factor-1, Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3, Gastric cancer, Gastric precancerous lesion