检验医学 ›› 2022, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 1190-1195.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2022.12.018

• 技术研究与评价·论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

流式细胞术外周血白细胞分类方法的建立和性能评价

宋颖, 韩姣姣, 赵强, 徐翀()   

  1. 上海市临床检验中心临床血液体液学研究室,上海 200126
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-18 修回日期:2022-10-30 出版日期:2022-12-30 发布日期:2023-02-02
  • 通讯作者: 徐翀,E-mail:xuchong@sccl.org.cn。
  • 作者简介:宋 颖,女,1977年生,硕士,副主任技师,主要从事临床血液、体液检验工作。
  • 基金资助:
    上海市卫生健康委员会卫生行业临床研究专项(190523195934706)

Establishment and performance evaluation of peripheral blood leukocyte classification reference method by flow cytometry

SONG Ying, HAN Jiaojiao, ZHAO Qiang, XU Chong()   

  1. Clinical Hematology and Osology Laboratory,Shanghai Center for Clinical Laboratory,Shanghai 200126,China
  • Received:2022-06-18 Revised:2022-10-30 Online:2022-12-30 Published:2023-02-02
  • Contact: XU Chong,E-mail:xuchong@sccl.org.cn。

摘要:

目的 建立流式细胞术外周血白细胞分类方法,并验证其分类的可行性。方法 采用CD16-Pacific Blue、CD45-V500、SYTO16、CD7-PE、CD123-PerCP-Cy5.5、CD14-PE-Cy7、CD3+CD19-APC、CD11b-APC-Cy7抗体组合,建立8色流式细胞术白细胞分类方法。收集50例健康体检者乙二胺四乙酸二钾抗凝外周血样本,分别采用全光谱流式细胞仪(流式法)、全自动血液分析仪(仪器法)和显微镜镜检(手工法)3种方法进行白细胞分类计数。采用Passing&Bablok回归对3种方法检测结果进行两两比较。以手工法为参考方法,评价3种方法白细胞分类方法的一致性。结果 成功建立了8色流式细胞术白细胞分类方法。仪器法和流式法的分类结果的回归方程的线性概率值(P)>0.05,2种方法中性粒细胞(NEUT)、淋巴细胞(LYMPH)、单核细胞(MONO)、嗜酸性粒细胞(EOS)、嗜碱性粒细胞(BASO)项目回归方程的斜率分别为1.01、0.98、0.97、1.00、2.33,截距分别为-1.53、0.90、-0.11、0.01、-0.23。手工法和仪器法白细胞分类结果的回归方程的线性概率值(P)>0.05;手工法和流式法NEUT、LYMPH、MONO、EOS、BASO项目回归方程的斜率分别为0.98、0.94、0.68、0.86、0.50,截距分别为-0.96、2.64、2.74、0.29、0.30;手工法和仪器法NEUT、LYMPH、MONO、EOS、BASO项目回归方程的斜率分别为0.99、0.94、0.76、0.93、0.12,截距分别为-1.13、1.79、2.69、0.25、0.26。以白细胞分类参考方法(手工法)为标准,流式法和仪器法白细胞分类结果均在参考区间内。方法学比较结果显示,流式法与仪器法的相关性优于流式法与参考方法。结论 成功建立了8色流式细胞术白细胞分类方法。该方法白细胞分类计数结果与参考方法具有相关性,且均在参考区间内。建立的流式法与仪器法的方法学一致性优于参考方法,可进一步提高临床血常规检测中白细胞分类的准确性。

关键词: 白细胞分类, 流式细胞术, 参考方法

Abstract:

Objective To establish the classification reference method of peripheral blood leukocytes by flow cytometry,and to verify the feasibility of its classification. Methods An 8-colour flow cytometry leukocyte counting protocol was established using a combination of CD16-Pacific Blue,CD45-V500,SYTO16,CD7-PE,CD123-PerCP-Cy5.5,CD14-PE-Cy7,CD3+CD19-APC and CD11b-APC-Cy7 antibodies. Peripheral blood samples were collected from 50 healthy subjects with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid dipotassium anticoagulation,and leukocyte classification was performed by full-spectrum flow cytometry(flow method),fully automated hematology analyzer(instrument method) and microscopy(manual method). Passing & Bablok regression was used to compare the determination results of the 3 methods for paired comparison. The manual method was used as a reference method to evaluate the consistency of the 3 methods of leukocyte classification methods. Results An 8-colour flow cytometry leukocyte counting protocol was established successfully. The linear probability values(P) of regression equations for the classification results of instrument method and flow method were >0.05. The slopes of the regression equations for neutrophil(NEUT),lymphocyte(LYMPH),monocyte(MONO),eosinophil (EOS)and basophil (BASO)of the 2 methods were 1.01,0.98,0.97,1.00 and 2.33,respectively,and the intercepts were -1.53,0.90,-0.11,0.01 and -0.23,respectively. The linear probability values(P) of regression equations for the classification results of manual method and instrument method were >0.05. The slopes of the regression equations for NEUT,LYMPH,MONO,EOS,and BASO of the manual method and flow method were 0.98,0.94,0.68,0.86 and 0.50,respectively,and the intercepts were -0.96,2.64,2.74,0.29 and 0.30,respectively. The slopes of the regression equations for NEUT,LYMPH,MONO,EOS,and BASO by the manual method and instrument method were 0.99,0.94,0.76,0.93 and 0.12,with the intercepts of -1.13,1.79,2.69,0.25 and 0.26,respectively. The slopes of the regression equations for NEUT,LYMPH,MONO,EOS,and BASO by the leukocyte classification was evaluated by the manual method of leukocyte classification,and the classification results of flow method and instrument method were within the confidence interval,but the flow method and the instrument method were evaluated as superior to the flow method and the manual method from the methodological comparison for correlation. Conclusions The 8-colour flow cytometry leukocyte classification method has been established. The flow method is correlated with the reference method,and the results are within the confidence interval of the reference method. The methodological agreement between the flow method and the instrument method is better than that of the reference method,and thus can further improve the accuracy of leukocyte classification in clinical routine blood tests.

Key words: Leukocyte classification, Flow cytometry, Reference method

中图分类号: