检验医学 ›› 2024, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 1219-1223.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2024.12.015

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

常见血红蛋白变异体对不同糖化血红蛋白检测系统的影响

宋蓓玲1, 吴炯2(), 胡嘉华2, 王煜非3()   

  1. 1.上海市第一妇婴保健医院检验科,上海 201999
    2.上海嘉会国际医院检验科,上海 200233
    3.上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院糖尿病研究所,上海 200125
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-24 修回日期:2024-07-26 出版日期:2024-12-30 发布日期:2025-01-06
  • 通讯作者: 王煜非,E-mail:wang1fei@126.com;吴炯:E-mail:joe.wu@jiahui.com。
  • 作者简介:宋蓓玲,女,1992年生,学士,技师,主要从事临床检验工作。
  • 基金资助:
    科技部国家重点研发项目(2018YFC2000802)

Influence of common hemoglobin variants on different glycated hemoglobin determination systems

SONG Beiling1, WU Jiong2(), HU Jiahua2, WANG Yufei3()   

  1. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory,Shanghai No.1 Maternity and Infant Hospital,Shanghai 201999,China
    2. Shanghai Jiahui International Hospital,Shanghai 200233,China
    3. Shanghai Diabetes Institute,the Sixth People's Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200125,China
  • Received:2024-01-24 Revised:2024-07-26 Online:2024-12-30 Published:2025-01-06

摘要:

目的 评估6种临床常用糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测系统对血红蛋白(Hb)变异体的识别能力和定量检测结果的准确性。方法 收集2020年12月—2022年12月上海嘉会国际医院和上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院HbA1c常规检测中的疑似Hb变异体干扰样本245例。采用6种临床常用检测系统(5种为高效液相色谱法,1种为毛细管电泳法)检测疑似干扰样本,并采用测序法确认Hb变异体的类型。以cobas c513全自动糖化血红蛋白仪(简称cobas c513)的检测结果为标准,评估6种检测系统的准确性。结果 245例疑似Hb变异体干扰样本经测序验证,共检出Hb变异体干扰样本141例,检出Hb变异体11种(Hb G-Coushatta、Hb G-Taipei、Hb J-Bangkok、Hb D-Los Angeles、Hb Pyrgos、Hb Q-Thailand、Hb Queens、Hb Quong Sze、Hb C、Hb E、Hb S)。仅Hb D-Los Angeles和Hb S可被6种检测系统全部检出,其他9种Hb变异体各检测系统的识别能力各异。除Hb S外,6种检测系统检测其他10种Hb变异体干扰样本的结果与cobas c513均有一定的差异。结论 目前临床常用的HbA1c检测系统对大部分Hb变异体的识别能力不足。对于Hb变异体的干扰,可采用不同方法进行检测,必要时进行测序验证。

关键词: 糖化血红蛋白, 血红蛋白变异体, 高效液相色谱法, 毛细管电泳法

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the recognition ability and the accuracy of quantitative determination results of 6 commonly used clinical glycated hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c) determination systems for hemoglobin(Hb) variants. Methods A total of 245 suspected Hb variant interference samples were collected from HbA1c routine test in Shanghai Jiahui International Hospital and the Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from December 2020 to December 2022. Six commonly used clinical determination systems(5 systems were high performance liquid chromatography,and 1 system was capillary electrophoresis) were used to determine suspected interference samples,and the types of Hb variants were confirmed by sequencing method. Based on the results of cobas c513 automatic glycated hemoglobin analyzer,the accuracy of 6 determination systems was evaluated. Results Totally,245 suspected Hb variant interference samples were verified by sequencing,141 Hb variant interference samples were determined. Eleven Hb variants(Hb G-Coushatta,Hb G-Taipei,Hb J-Bangkok,Hb D-Los Angeles,Hb Pyrgos,Hb Q-Thailand,Hb Queens,Hb Quong Sze,Hb C,Hb E,Hb S) were determined. Only Hb D-Los Angeles and Hb S can be determined by all the 6 determination systems,and the determination systems for the other 9 Hb variants had different recognition abilities. Except for Hb S,the results of 6 determination systems for the interference samples of other 10 Hb variants were different from those of cobas c513. Conclusions The commonly used clinical HbA1c determination system is not able to identify most of the Hb variants. For the interference of Hb variants,different methods can be used for determination and sequencing verification if necessary.

Key words: Glycated hemoglobin A1c, Hemoglobin variant, High performance liquid chromatography, Capillary electrophoresis

中图分类号: