检验医学 ›› 2014, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 741-744.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2014.07.012

• 临床应用研究·论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

SYSMEXXE-5000血液分析仪血小板准确计数的相关分析

张伟红,陈斌,蔡梦珊,李结秋,陈英姿,黄乐升   

  1. 广州医学院附属广州市第一人民医院检验科,广东 广州 510180
  • 收稿日期:2014-03-17 出版日期:2014-07-30 发布日期:2014-07-21
  • 作者简介:张伟红,女,1971年生,副主任技师,主要从事临床检验工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(8121163)

Correlation analysis of SYSMEX XE-5000 hematology analyzer in counting platelet

ZHANG Weihong,CHEN Bin,CAI Mengshan,LI Jieqiu,CHEN Yingzi,HUANG Lesheng   

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Guangzhou First People′ s Hospital, Guangzhou Medical College, Guangdong Guangzhou 510180, China
  • Received:2014-03-17 Online:2014-07-30 Published:2014-07-21

摘要:

目的 探讨红细胞碎片(FRC)、红细胞体积(MCV)、血小板参数[血小板分布宽度(PDW)、大血小板比率(P-LCR)、血小板压积(PCT]、幼稚血小板(IPF)对SYSMEX XE-5000血液分析仪(简称XE-5000)计数血小板(PLT)准确性的影响。方法 选取采用XE-5000电阻抗法检测无FRC的标本200例,按 MCV(<6060~<7070~<80≥80 fL)分为4组(A1组、B1组、C1组、D1组,每组各50例);选取MCV≥70 fLFRC分别为0.1%0.99%A2组)、≥1.0%B2组)的标本各40例;选取MCV≥70 fL且无FRCPLT参数(PDWPCTP-LCR)显示“—”(表示检测不出结果)的标本50例(C2组),分别采用电阻抗法、光学法和手工法计数以上330例标本的PLT并推片镜检;分别采用电阻抗法、光学法和手工法连续5 d测定1例幼稚PLT增高患者的PLT并进行镜检。结果 A1组、A2组、B1组、B2组、C2组电阻抗法和手工法计数PLT差异有统计学意义(P0.05),C1组和D1组两种方法之间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。A1组、B1组、C1组、D1组、A2组、B2组、C2组光学法与手工法计数PLT差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。电阻抗法测定幼稚PLT增高患者的PLT连续5 d均低于手工法和光学法;手工法计数PLT结果相对稳定,而电阻抗法、光学法结果随着幼稚PLT的不断成熟而增高,镜检有大量巨大PLT结论 采用XE-5000测定MCV70 fL、含有FRCPLT参数结果显示“—”的标本时应选择光学法通道进行PLT复查,并进行涂片镜检。IPF增高且镜检有较多巨大PLT的标本应进行手工计数。

关键词: 红细胞体积, 红细胞碎片, 血小板参数, 幼稚血小板, 血小板计数

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the accuracy of plateletPLT counting which was influenced by erythrocyte fragmentsFRC), red blood cell volumeMCV), PLT parameters [platelet distribution widthPDW), platelet-larger cell ratioP-LCR and platelet hematocritPCT] and immature plateletsIPF by SYSMEX XE-5000 hematology analyzerXE-5000. Methods The 200 samples with no FRC were analyzed by XE-5000 and were classified into 4 groups and each group of 50 cases: A1 groupMCV60 fL), B1 group60 fL≤MCV70 fL), C1 group70 fL≤MCV80 fL and D1 groupMCV ≥ 80 fL), respectively. The samples with FRC of different concentrations and MCV ≥70 fL were classified into 2 groups and each group of 40 cases: A2 group0.1%≤FRC≤0.99% and B2 groupFRC≥1.0%), respectively. The samples of 50 cases with no FRC MCV≥70 fL and PLT parametersPDW PCT and P-LCR showed "-"C2 group were chosen. PLT counting was performed in the 330 cases and determined for microscopy by electrical impedance analysis optics and manual method. One case of naive patients with thrombocythemia was continuously observed for 5 d by electrical impedance analysis optics and manual method. Results There were significant differences between electrical impedance analysis and manual method from A1 A2 B1 B2 and C2 groupsP0.05. It showed no statistical significance between electrical impedance analysis and manual method from C1 and D1 groupsP0.05. It showed no statistical significance between optics and manual method from A1 B1 C1 D1 A2 B2 and C2 groupsP0.05. One case of naive patients with thrombocythemia was continuously observed for 5 d by the 3 methods respectively. The results of electrical impedance analysis were less than those of optics and manual method. The results of manual method were relatively stable and the results of electrical impedance analysis and optics increased with the mature of PLT. There existed giant PLT by microscopy. Conclusions When the samples of MCV 70 fL FRC and PLT parameters shows "-" by XE-5000 and it should be measured by optics and smear microscopy. While the specimens with high IPF and many giant PLT under microscopy they should be detected by manual method.

Key words: Red blood cell volume, Erythrocyte fragment, Platelet parameter, Immature platelet, Platelet counting

中图分类号: