检验医学 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 428-433.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2020.05.007

• 临床应用研究·论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

慢性乙型肝炎与肝硬化患者乙型肝炎病毒S蛋白变异分析

原永明1, 章晓鹰2, 顾超2, 张珏2, 孙学华3   

  1. 1.上海大华医院检验科,上海 200237
    2.上海中医药大学附属曙光医院检验科,上海 201203
    3. 上海中医药大学附属曙光医院肝炎科,上海 201203
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-29 出版日期:2020-05-30 发布日期:2020-06-17
  • 作者简介:null

    作者简介:原永明,男,1963年生,学士,副主任技师,主要从事临床免疫学检验工作。

Analysis of hepatitis B virus S protein mutation in chronic hepatitis B and cirrhosis patients

YUAN Yongming1, ZHANG Xiaoying2, GU Chao2, ZHANG Jue2, SUN Xuehua3   

  1. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory,Shanghai Xuhui Dahua Hospital,Shanghai 200237,China
    2. Department of Clinical Laboratory,Shuguang Hospital,Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 201203,China
    3. Department of Hepatology,Shuguang Hospital,Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 201203,China
  • Received:2019-10-29 Online:2020-05-30 Published:2020-06-17

摘要:

目的 探讨慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者、肝硬化患者乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)S蛋白变异的差异及其临床意义。方法 选取CHB患者114例,其中慢性HBV携带者41例(慢性HBV携带组)、非活动性乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)携带者38例(非活动性HBsAg携带组)、肝硬化组35例(肝硬化组)。采用测序法检测所有对象的HBV S蛋白基因序列。结果 慢性HBV携带组、非活动性HBsAg携带组与肝硬化组之间年龄和HBV DNA载量差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),性别及HBV基因型差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。肝硬化组HBV S蛋白总体变异率明显高于非活动性HBsAg携带组和慢性HBV携带组(P<0.05、P<0.01)。慢性HBV携带组、非活动性HBsAg携带组与肝硬化组S蛋白的主要亲水区(MHR)外变异率及细胞毒T淋巴细胞(CTL)+辅助性T淋巴细胞(Th)免疫表位区变异率依次升高(P<0.01)。3组之间S蛋白的MHR及位于MHR内的“a”决定簇、LOOP1和LOOP2的变异率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),MHR外的非免疫表位区变异率差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05)。慢性HBV携带组中有1例患者同时出现MHR外Th免疫表位区、CTL免疫表位区和非免疫表位区3个位点变异,1例患者出现MHR与MHR外Th免疫表位区2个位点变异,其他患者均为单点变异,且MHR外CTL+Th免疫表位区与非免疫表位区变异率相当,呈随机分布。非活动性HBsAg携带组有5例(13.15%)患者出现2个位点以上的变异,肝硬化组有9例(25.71%)患者出现2个位点以上的变异,且2个组的变异位点集中于MHR外CTL+Th免疫表位区。结论 HBV S蛋白MHR外,尤其是MHR外CTL+Th免疫表位区变异不仅与HBeAg阴性血清学状态相关,也与肝硬化相关。

关键词: 乙型肝炎病毒, S蛋白, 基因测序

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the difference of hepatitis B virus(HBV) S protein mutations in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and cirrhosis,and to assess its role in clinical application. Methods A total of 114 patients with CHB were enrolled,and they were classified into 3 groups,asymptomatic HBV carriers(41 cases),inactive hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg) carriers(38 cases) and cirrhosis patients(35 cases). DNA sequencing was used to determine HBV S protein gene mutation. Results There was statistical significance in age and HBV DNA loads of asymptomatic HBV carrier,inactive HBsAg carrier and cirrhosis groups(P<0.01),and there was no statistical significance in sex and HBV genotypes(P>0.05). The gene mutation frequency of HBV S protein was higher in cirrhosis group than those in asymptomatic HBV carrier group(P<0.05) and inactive HBsAg carrier group(P<0.01). The mutation rates in outside major hydrophilic region(MHR) and cytotoxic T lymphocytes(CTL) +helper T cell(Th) epitopes were increased in the 3 groups(asymptomatic HBV carrier<inactive HBsAg carrier<cirrhosis patient)(P<0.01). There was no statistical significance among the 3 groups in MHR and a determinant,LOOP1,LOOP2 located in MHR and non-immune epitopes located outside MHR(P>0.05). Single amino acid substitution was found in the majority of asymptomatic HBV carriers except 2 patients. Of these,one had 3 amino acid substitutions in CTL+Th epitopes and non-immune epitopes located outside MHR,and another had 2 amino acid substitutions in MHR and CTL+Th epitopes outside MHR. The mutation rates in CTL+Th epitopes and non-immune epitopes outside MHR were comparable and random for asymptomatic HBV carriers,whereas more than 2 mutation sites were determined in 5 cases of inactive HBsAg carriers(13.15%) and 9 patients with cirrhosis(25.71%). These mutation sites preferentially concentrated at the CTL+Th epitopes outside MHR. Conclusions High prevalence of outside MHR variants especially CTL+Th epitopes is associated not only with hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg)-negative serostatus but also with severe liver diseases,particularly cirrhosis.

Key words: Hepatitis B virus, S protein, DNA sequencing

中图分类号: