检验医学 ›› 2012, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 503-505.

• 实验室管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

定量PCR HBV DNA室间质量评价可接受范围的探讨

肖艳群,蒋玲丽   

  1. 上海市临床检验中心,上海 200126
  • 收稿日期:2012-01-18 修回日期:2012-02-28 出版日期:2012-06-30 发布日期:2012-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 肖艳群
  • 作者简介:肖艳群,女,1964年生,学士,副主任技师,主要从事临床免疫和分子生物学质量控制管理工作。

Investigation on acceptable range of external quality assessment of quantitative PCR for HBV DNA detection

  • Received:2012-01-18 Revised:2012-02-28 Online:2012-06-30 Published:2012-06-06
  • Contact: Yan-Qun XIAO

摘要: 目的 探讨定量聚合酶链反应(PCR)HBV DNA 室间质量评价合理的可接受范围,使室间质量评价能更真实地反映和监控实验室检测能力。方法 由上海市临床检验中心安排人员对51家临床实验室进行5个样本HBV DNA项目的飞行检查,3 h后由调查人员现场带回检测结果并对结果进行统计分析。使用单位数≥10家的试剂以A、B、C表示,以试剂分组,分别比较各试剂组的检测结果、组均值和不同浓度样本标准差(s)和变异系数(CV)的差异,并分别用组均值±3s、组均值±0.5log10和溯源至国家标准品得出的检测值换算成的对数值±0.4 3种评价方式对实验室检测结果进行评价。结果 各试剂组检测结果之间有差异,A试剂组与B试剂组比较,1142、1144、1145样本检测结果差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05),与C试剂组比较,1144、1145样本检测结果差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05);A试剂组均值与B、C组比较,或与溯源至国家标准品的测定值(单位为IU/mL,结果用对数值表示)比较,1144、1145差值均超过了0.4;4个不同浓度样本其sCV0.4时的sCV3种评价方式评价实验室成绩合格率分别为100%、88.2%、64.7%。结论 采用组均值±3s为定量PCRHBV DNA 室间质量评价的可接受范围更合理,更能真实地反映和监控实验室检测能力。均超过了允许总误差为

关键词: 乙型肝炎病毒, DNA, 聚合酶链反应, 室间质量评价, 可接受范围

Abstract: Objective To investigate the reasonable acceptable range of external quality assessment of quantitative polymerase chain reaction(PCR) for hepatitis B virus(HBV) DNA detection, and make the external quality assessment more truly reflect and monitor the detection capabilities of clinical laboratories. Methods Shanghai Center for Clinical Laboratory arranged a flight check for HBV DNA with 5 quality control samples,which were distributed to 51 participating clinical laboratories. After 3 hours,the test results of all participants were brought back and analyzed by investigator. The reagents were classified into A, B and C groups, according to the number of hospital using ≥10. The results,group mean values, sample standard deviations(s) ith different concentrations and coefficients of variatio(CV) among various reagent groups were compared, respectively. The value of logarithm±0.4 calculated from group mean value±3s, group mean value±0.5log10 and test values traceable to national standards was used to evaluate the detection results of clinical laboratory. Results The detection results of clinical laboratories among various reagent groups had significant difference. Compared with the B reagent group,the A reagent group detection results of sample 1142,1144 and 1145 were statistically significant(P<0.05). Compared with the C reagent group, the A reagent group detection results of sample 1144 and 1145 were statistically significant(P<0.05). When comparing the A reagent group mean value with the B and C reagent group mean values,or the test values traceable to national standards (the results indicated as logarithm value, and the unit was IU/mL), the difference of sample 1144 and 1145 exceeded 0.4,and the sample s and s and CV of 4 different concentration samples all exceeded the sample s and CV with an allowable total errors of 0.4. The pass rates of participating laboratories which were evaluated by the 3 kinds of Methods were 100%,88.2% and 64.7%, respectively. Conclusions The mean value±3s used for acceptable range of external quality assessment of the quantitative PCR for HBV DNA detection is more reasonable, and can truly reflect and monitor the detection capabilities of clinical laboratories.

Key words: Hepatitis B virus, DNA, Polymerase chain reaction, External quality assessment, Acceptable range