检验医学 ›› 2016, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 419-422.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2016.05.016

• 实验室管理· 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

福建省三级医院临床检验互认项目参考区间现况

陈喜军, 陈发林, 王友基   

  1. 福建省临床检验中心,福建 福州 350001
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-20 出版日期:2016-05-30 发布日期:2016-06-13
  • 作者简介:null

    作者简介:陈喜军,男,1972年生,硕士,副主任技师,主要从事临床检验工作。

Reference intervals of clinical laboratory inter-accreditation items of Grade 3 hospitals in Fujian

CHEN Xijun, CHEN Falin, WANG Youji   

  1. Fujian Provincial Center for Clinical Laboratory,Fuzhou 350001,Fujian,China
  • Received:2014-11-20 Online:2016-05-30 Published:2016-06-13

摘要:

目的 了解福建省三级医院临床检验互认项目参考区间回报结果及来源,比较其常规化学与干化学各项目参考区间的差异,为建立全省范围健康人群临床检验互认项目参考区间提供帮助。方法 收集福建省27家三级医院29个临床检验互认项目的1 246个参考区间信息,剔除异常值和错误数据(下限高于上限、上下限相同等),分析常规化学与干化学各项目参考区间的差异。结果 丙氨酸氨基转移酶、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶、甘油三酯和总胆固醇参考区间下限以及甲胎蛋白、癌胚抗原参考区间上限的最大值和最小值之间差异很大;游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸和游离四碘甲状腺原氨酸报告结果单位不统一;参考区间来源中所占比例最高的3 项依次是仪器及试剂厂家说明书、《全国临床检验操作规程》和国家卫生行业标准。在常规化学和干化学参考区间的比较中,丙氨酸氨基转移酶和乳酸脱氢酶差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 目前,福建省三级医院部分临床检验互认项目参考区间差异明显,来源不统一;少数常规化学与干化学项目参考区间存在统计学上的差异。为了实现医疗机构检验结果的互认,必须在标准化的基础上,在一定区域内共享相同的参考区间。

关键词: 临床检验, 参考区间, 互认项目, 常规化学, 干化学

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the results and sources of reference intervals in clinical laboratory inter-accreditation items among Grade 3 hospitals in Fujian,compare the difference between routine and dry chemistry in these aspects,and provide a reference to establish reference intervals of clinical laboratory inter-accreditation items for healthy subjects in Fujian. Methods A total of 1 246 data of reference intervals were collected from 29 inter-accreditation items of 27 Grade 3 hospitals in Fujian. All abnormal values and errors(lower limit was higher than upper one,or upper limit was as the same as lower one,etc.)were eliminated. The difference between routine and dry chemistry reference intervals were analyzed by SPSS 11.0.Results The differences between maximum and minimum values about the lower limits of alanine aminotransferase,aspartate aminotransferase,triglyceride and total cholesterol and the upper limits of alpha fetoprotein and carcinoembryonic antigen were big. The results of free triiodothyronine and free thyroxine were not unified. The 3 main sources of reference intervals were instructions of reagent manufacturers,the National Guide to Clinical Laboratory Procedures and the industry standards of the National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China. In comparison of routine and dry chemistry,the reference intervals of alanine aminotransferase and lactate dehydrogenase had significant differences(P<0.05). Conclusions The reference intervals of a part of inter-accreditation items of Grade 3 hospitals in Fujian have differences,and the sources of them are various.A few assays have statistical significance in routine and dry chemistry. In order to achieve inter-accreditation,all laboratories must share common reference intervals on the basis of standardization.

Key words: Clinical determination, Reference interval, Inter-accreditation items, Routine chemistry, Dry chemistry

中图分类号: