检验医学 ›› 2015, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 1167-1174.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2015.12.002

• 正视抗丙型肝炎病毒抗体和抗梅毒螺旋体抗体筛查试验的假阳性问题专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

抗HCV抗体和抗TP抗体筛查试验的假阳性问题及对策研究进展

陈存存综述, 范列英审校   

  1. 上海市东方医院检验科,上海 200120
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-19 出版日期:2015-12-20 发布日期:2016-01-04
  • 作者简介:null

    作者简介:陈存存,女,1985年生,博士,技师,主要从事免疫学和感染性疾病研究。

    通讯作者:范列英,联系电话:021-38804518-14202。

The study progress of false positivity in screening assay for detecting anti-HCV antibody and anti-TP antibody and its strategy

CHEN Cuncun, FAN Lieying.   

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Orient Hospital, Shanghai 200120, China
  • Received:2015-06-19 Online:2015-12-20 Published:2016-01-04

摘要:

酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和化学发光免疫分析法(CLIA)检测抗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)抗体和抗梅毒螺旋体(TP)抗体存在一定比例的假阳性,故需经确证试验方能报告阳性结果。确定特定检测试剂(系统)在特定人群筛查试验结果的阳性预测值达95%的信号/临界值(S/CO)比值,可作为尽可能降低ELISA 或CLIA检测抗HCV抗体或抗TP抗体假阳性率和经济合理应用确证试验的对策。

关键词: 抗丙型肝炎病毒抗体, 抗梅毒螺旋体抗体, 筛查试验, 假阳性, 确证试验

Abstract:

There is a certain proportion of false positivity in screening assay for detecting anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV)antibody and anti-treponema pallidum(TP)antibody by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). Therefore, it is required to report positive results by confirmation assay . It is an alternative strategy for reducing false positive rate as far as possible in detecting anti-HCV antibody and anti-TP antibody by ELISA and CLIA and making the application of confirmation assay economic and rational by determining the signal-to-cut off (S/CO) ratio, when the positive predictive value of screening assay results reaches 95% with certain detection reagent (system) and in certain population.

Key words: Anti-hepatitis C virus antibody, Anti-treponema pallidum antibody, Screening assay, False positivity, Confirmation assay

中图分类号: