Laboratory Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 900-904.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2024.09.014
Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Limin, LIU Shanfeng, WANG Ping()
Received:
2023-11-14
Revised:
2024-05-15
Online:
2024-09-30
Published:
2024-10-15
CLC Number:
WANG Limin, LIU Shanfeng, WANG Ping. Positive rate of urine cast after heart transplantation and its influencing factors[J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2024, 39(9): 900-904.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.shjyyx.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2024.09.014
组别 | 患者/例 | 性别 | 年龄/岁 | 有糖尿病史/ [例(%)] | 有高血压病史/ [例(%)] | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
男性/[例(%)] | 女/[例(%)] | ||||||||||||
尿管型阳性组 | 56 | 43(76.8%) | 13(23.2%) | 50±13 | 18(32.1) | 18(32.1) | |||||||
尿管型阴性组 | 87 | 70(80.5%) | 17(19.5) | 49±13 | 34(39.1) | 32(36.8) | |||||||
统计值 | 0.277 | -0.666 | 0.709 | 0.322 | |||||||||
P值 | 0.598 | 0.507 | 0.400 | 0.570 | |||||||||
组别 | 移植时间 | 干化学尿蛋白 | 尿酸/(μmol·L-1) | ||||||||||
<1年/[例(%)] | 1~3年/[例(%)] | >3年/[例(%)] | 阳性/[例(%)] | 阴性/[例(%)] | |||||||||
尿管型阳性组 | 23(41.1) | 5(8.9) | 28(50.0) | 14(25.0) | 42(75.0) | 365.8±105.7 | |||||||
尿管型阴性组 | 17(19.5) | 36(41.4) | 34(39.1) | 12(13.8) | 75(86.2) | 359.9±92.8 | |||||||
统计值 | 19.097 | 2.876 | -0.353 | ||||||||||
P值 | <0.001 | 0.090 | 0.725 | ||||||||||
组别 | 尿素氮/ (mmol·L-1) | SCr/ (μmol·L-1) | 胱抑素C/ (mg·L-1) | eGFR①/ [mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1] | 直接胆红素/(μmol·L-1) | ||||||||
尿管型阳性组 | 9.70(7.75,12.86) | 113.5(97.4,143.1) | 1.30(1.09,1.70) | 61.45(44.02,77.19) | 4.6(3.2,6.1) | ||||||||
尿管型阴性组 | 8.57(6.47,10.19) | 91.6(78.7,130.6) | 1.13(0.87,1.36) | 76.84(53.58,97.01) | 4.8(3.7,6.1) | ||||||||
统计值 | -2.645 | -2.277 | -3.206 | -2.639 | -0.861 | ||||||||
P值 | 0.008 | 0.023 | 0.001 | 0.008 | 0.390 | ||||||||
组别 | B型钠尿肽/(pg·mL-1) | 射血分数/% | 空腹血糖/(mmol·L-1) | 糖化血红蛋白/% | 他克莫司/(ng·mL-1) | ||||||||
尿管型阳性组 | 68.2(44.9,97.9) | 63.5±0.7 | 5.50(5.00,6.68) | 6.0(5.5,6.8) | 8.6(7.3,10.5) | ||||||||
尿管型阴性组 | 54.5(33.8,93.3) | 64.9±0.5 | 5.70(5.10,6.80) | 6.0(5.6,6.8) | 7.7(6.5,9.3) | ||||||||
统计值 | -1.906 | 1.698 | -0.631 | -0.227 | -2.561 | ||||||||
P值 | 0.057 | 0.092 | 0.528 | 0.820 | 0.010 |
组别 | 患者/例 | 性别 | 年龄/岁 | 有糖尿病史/ [例(%)] | 有高血压病史/ [例(%)] | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
男性/[例(%)] | 女/[例(%)] | ||||||||||||
尿管型阳性组 | 56 | 43(76.8%) | 13(23.2%) | 50±13 | 18(32.1) | 18(32.1) | |||||||
尿管型阴性组 | 87 | 70(80.5%) | 17(19.5) | 49±13 | 34(39.1) | 32(36.8) | |||||||
统计值 | 0.277 | -0.666 | 0.709 | 0.322 | |||||||||
P值 | 0.598 | 0.507 | 0.400 | 0.570 | |||||||||
组别 | 移植时间 | 干化学尿蛋白 | 尿酸/(μmol·L-1) | ||||||||||
<1年/[例(%)] | 1~3年/[例(%)] | >3年/[例(%)] | 阳性/[例(%)] | 阴性/[例(%)] | |||||||||
尿管型阳性组 | 23(41.1) | 5(8.9) | 28(50.0) | 14(25.0) | 42(75.0) | 365.8±105.7 | |||||||
尿管型阴性组 | 17(19.5) | 36(41.4) | 34(39.1) | 12(13.8) | 75(86.2) | 359.9±92.8 | |||||||
统计值 | 19.097 | 2.876 | -0.353 | ||||||||||
P值 | <0.001 | 0.090 | 0.725 | ||||||||||
组别 | 尿素氮/ (mmol·L-1) | SCr/ (μmol·L-1) | 胱抑素C/ (mg·L-1) | eGFR①/ [mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1] | 直接胆红素/(μmol·L-1) | ||||||||
尿管型阳性组 | 9.70(7.75,12.86) | 113.5(97.4,143.1) | 1.30(1.09,1.70) | 61.45(44.02,77.19) | 4.6(3.2,6.1) | ||||||||
尿管型阴性组 | 8.57(6.47,10.19) | 91.6(78.7,130.6) | 1.13(0.87,1.36) | 76.84(53.58,97.01) | 4.8(3.7,6.1) | ||||||||
统计值 | -2.645 | -2.277 | -3.206 | -2.639 | -0.861 | ||||||||
P值 | 0.008 | 0.023 | 0.001 | 0.008 | 0.390 | ||||||||
组别 | B型钠尿肽/(pg·mL-1) | 射血分数/% | 空腹血糖/(mmol·L-1) | 糖化血红蛋白/% | 他克莫司/(ng·mL-1) | ||||||||
尿管型阳性组 | 68.2(44.9,97.9) | 63.5±0.7 | 5.50(5.00,6.68) | 6.0(5.5,6.8) | 8.6(7.3,10.5) | ||||||||
尿管型阴性组 | 54.5(33.8,93.3) | 64.9±0.5 | 5.70(5.10,6.80) | 6.0(5.6,6.8) | 7.7(6.5,9.3) | ||||||||
统计值 | -1.906 | 1.698 | -0.631 | -0.227 | -2.561 | ||||||||
P值 | 0.057 | 0.092 | 0.528 | 0.820 | 0.010 |
项目 | AUC(95% CI) | P值 | 最佳临界值 | 敏感性/% | 特异性/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
尿素氮 | 0.631(0.538~0.724) | 0.008 | 6.68 mmol·L-1 | 91.1 | 31.0 |
血肌酐 | 0.613(0.519~0.707) | 0.023 | 92.00 μmol·L-1 | 82.1 | 50.6 |
胱抑素C | 0.659(0.570~0.748) | 0.001 | 1.06 mg·L-1 | 82.1 | 47.1 |
他克莫司 | 0.627(0.533~0.721) | 0.010 | 8.25 ng·mL-1 | 60.7 | 60.9 |
eGFR | 0.369(0.276~0.462) | 0.008 | 120.12 mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1 | 7.1 | 97.7 |
他克莫司+移植时间 | 0.746(0.664~0.829) | <0.001 | 0.511 | 57.1 | 82.8 |
多指标联合检测 | 0.810(0.736~0.883) | <0.001 | 0.293 | 89.3 | 64.4 |
项目 | AUC(95% CI) | P值 | 最佳临界值 | 敏感性/% | 特异性/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
尿素氮 | 0.631(0.538~0.724) | 0.008 | 6.68 mmol·L-1 | 91.1 | 31.0 |
血肌酐 | 0.613(0.519~0.707) | 0.023 | 92.00 μmol·L-1 | 82.1 | 50.6 |
胱抑素C | 0.659(0.570~0.748) | 0.001 | 1.06 mg·L-1 | 82.1 | 47.1 |
他克莫司 | 0.627(0.533~0.721) | 0.010 | 8.25 ng·mL-1 | 60.7 | 60.9 |
eGFR | 0.369(0.276~0.462) | 0.008 | 120.12 mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1 | 7.1 | 97.7 |
他克莫司+移植时间 | 0.746(0.664~0.829) | <0.001 | 0.511 | 57.1 | 82.8 |
多指标联合检测 | 0.810(0.736~0.883) | <0.001 | 0.293 | 89.3 | 64.4 |
[1] | SQUIRES R W, BONIKOWSKE A R. Cardiac rehabilitation for heart transplant patients:considerations for exercise training[J]. Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 2022,70:40-48. |
[2] | KHUSH K K, POTENA L, CHERIKH W S, et al. The international thoracic organ transplant registry of the international society for heart and lung transplantation:37th adult heart transplantation report-2020; focus on deceased donor characteristics[J]. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2020, 39(10):1003-1015. |
[3] |
SHAH K S, KITTLESON M M, KOBASHIGAWA J A. Updates on heart transplantation[J]. Curr Heart Fail Rep, 2019, 16(5):150-156.
DOI PMID |
[4] | THONGPRAYOON C, LERTJITBANJONG P, HANSRIVIJIT P, et al. Acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac transplantation:a meta-analysis[J]. Medicines(Basel), 2019, 6(4):108. |
[5] | 夏天, 余文静, 李飞. 心脏移植术后肾损伤相关并发症研究进展[J]. 器官移植, 2022, 13(4):463-468. |
[6] | ROEST S, HESSELINK D A, KLIMCZAK-TOMANIAK D, et al. Incidence of end-stage renal disease after heart transplantation and effect ofits treatment on survival[J]. ESC Heart Fail, 2020, 7(2):533-541. |
[7] |
罗国菊, 金晶, 徐佳, 等. UF-5000全自动尿液分析仪健康成人全参数参考区间分析[J]. 检验医学, 2022, 37(8):751-753.
DOI |
[8] | GONZÁLEZ-VÍLCHEZ F, VÁZQUEZ DE PRADA J A. Chronic renal insufficiency in heart transplant recipients:risk factors and management options[J]. Drugs, 2014, 74(13):1481-1494. |
[9] | 中华医学会检验医学分会血液学与体液学学组. 尿液检验有形成分名称与结果报告专家共识[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2021, 44(7):574-586. |
[10] | 郑珊珊, 廖中凯, 刘盛, 等. 心脏移植后肾功能不全的危险因素分析以及对预后的影响[J]. 中华器官移植杂志, 2023, 44(5):275-282. |
[11] | 刘善凤, 张科, 王利民, 等. 尿胆红素阳性作为尿液分析复检规则的临床应用[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2023, 46(9):919-924. |
[12] | PERAZELLA M A, COCA S G, KANBAY M, et al. Diagnostic value of urine microscopy for differential diagnosis of acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2008, 3(6):1615-1619. |
[13] | BIANCO J C, STANG M V, DENAULT A Y, et al. Acute kidney injury after heart transplant:the importance of pulmonary hypertension[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2021, 35(7):2052-2062. |
[14] | AHANGIRIFARD A, AHMADI Z H, KHALILI N, et al. Early post-operative acute kidney injury after cardiac transplantation:incidence and predictive factors[J]. Clin Transplant, 2021, 35(11):e14420. |
[15] | NICOARA A, KRETZER A, COOTER M, et al. Association between primary graft dysfunction and acute kidney injury after orthotopic heart transplantation-a retrospective,observational cohort study[J]. Transpl Int, 2020, 33(8):887-894. |
[16] | M´PEMBELE R, ROTH S, STRODA A, et al. Risk factors for acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy after orthotopic heart transplantation in patients with preserved renal function[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(18):4117. |
[17] | GRUPPER A, GRUPPER A, DALY R C, et al. Kidney transplantation as a therapeutic option for end-stage renal disease developing after heart transplantation[J]. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2017, 36(3):297-304. |
[18] | BRAITHWAITE H E, DARLEY D R, BRETT J, et al. Identifying the association between tacrolimus exposure and toxicity in heart and lung transplant recipients:a systematic review[J]. Transplant Rev(Orlando), 2021, 35(2):100610. |
[19] | 王翔, 刘国栋, 余爱荣, 等. 肾移植受者他克莫司肾毒性与FOXP3基因多态性的相关性研究[J]. 中国药师, 2020, 23(10):1953-1956. |
[1] | WANG Xiaomei, LUO Chao, TIE Yang, HE Yong, YANG Xikui, LIU Yalin, SUN Yue, WANG Fugang, HE He. Application of random urine uric acid/creatinine in classification of hyperuricemia patients in Karamay [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2024, 39(9): 859-864. |
[2] | GUO Chaonan, WANG Yanyan, ZHANG Bei, PANG Jingying, CUI Feifei, ZHAO Yongxin, SU Bing. Analysis of drug resistance and virulence of Klebsiella pneumoniae from different clinical samples [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2024, 39(9): 880-887. |
[3] | LIU Jianxing, WANG Jinpeng, GENG Xinlong, WANG Shan. Role of urinary exosome miR-214 expression in diagnosis and prognosis assessment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2024, 39(10): 969-974. |
[4] | WANG Gangqiang, DIAO Yanjun, HE Juan, YANG Ruofan, YAN Hongbin, WANG Pei, LU Pei, LI Chenghua, XIAO Fengjing, ZHENG Shanluan, HAO Xiaoke, CHENG Xiang, LIU Jiayun. Establishment,verification and clinical application of automatic urine analysis system audit rule [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(10): 957-966. |
[5] | WU Yating, LI Zhuolin, LEI Yan, JIA Ruxue, ZHANG Shenghang, WANG Shuiliang. Research progress of miRNA in urine as a biomarker for common malignant tumors [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(1): 94-99. |
[6] | PAN Fen, PAN Yuxuan, SHI Yingying, YU Fangyuan, ZHANG Hong. UroQuick rapid urine culture technique for urinary tract infection in children [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 37(7): 652-656. |
[7] | Danqu, Luosangcizhen, Zerenqucuo, MA Chaochao, LIU Zhijuan. Combined detection of urinary total protein to avoid the hook effect of urinary microalbumin [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2021, 36(5): 477-479. |
[8] | WANG Jinduo, CUI Yunqing, ZHANG Hui, Yanhua, LI Yinghua. Effect of vulva cleaning operation to the determination results of urinary biochemical indexes [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2021, 36(11): 1169-1171. |
[9] | XIAO Nan, ZHOU Jia, DUAN Ning, ZHU Tianyang, WANG Lijun. Establishment and evaluation of fast predictive algorithm for urinary tract infection pathogen in patients with nephrolithiasis [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2021, 36(1): 75-79. |
[10] | ZHOU Xin, ZHANG Jue, CHEN Liying. Study on the main causes for false increasing of white blood cells and small round epithelial cells determined by UF-1000i urine sediment analyzer [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2020, 35(5): 444-446. |
[11] | ZHOU Xin, ZHANG Jue, CHEN Liying. Study on the main causes for false increasing of white blood cells and small round epithelial cells determined by UF-1000i urine sediment analyzer [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2020, 35(5): 444-446. |
[12] | YANG Meiling, LIU Hao, YANG Lin, ZHU Ping. Research progress on the biomarkers of urinary tract infection [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2020, 35(2): 178-180. |
[13] | YU Shuping, YUAN Dandan, CUI Ming, JING Rongrong, WANG Huimin. Development of BCR-ABL1 candidate reference material and evaluation of measurement uncertainty [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2019, 34(8): 752-757. |
[14] | WANG Xueying, LIU Huan, ZHOU Xiang, YANG Ruofan, WANG Chun'e, MA Lian, BAI Bifeng, LI Feng. Role of urinary aquaporin 2 in evaluating proximal tubular injury [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2019, 34(7): 626-629. |
[15] | WEI Yongtao, WANG Songxia. Analysis of urinary iodine levels of pregnant women in Qingdao [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2019, 34(10): 905-907. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||