Clinical laboratories should pay attention to the standardized detection of semen

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2020.11.002

Abstract

Abstract:

The accuracy and reliability of semen analysis results affect the diagnosis and treatment of related diseases. Therefore,the clinical laboratories should pay attention to the standardized detection of semen. The standardization of semen analysis is reflected not only in the reasonable and scientific methodology,but also in the collection of semen samples,the name of detection items and specific operation details of each detection item. In the lack of specified institutions for the external quality assessment of semen analysis at present,it is necessary to establish the appropriate intra-laboratory quality control measures. With the continuous popularization of the automation of semen analysis and the optimization of instrument settings,the standardization of semen analysis will be easier to be implemented,and education,training and quality control will be important measures to ensure that all clinical laboratories carry out the standardized detection of semen samples and maintain the long-term stability of detection results.

Key words: Semen analysis, Standardization, Quality control

CLC Number:

R446.1

LU Jinchun. Clinical laboratories should pay attention to the standardized detection of semen[J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2020, 35(11): 1090-1093.

References 20

[1]	AHADI M,ALIAKBARI F,LATIFI S,et al.Evaluation of the standardization in semen analysis performance according to the WHO protocols among laboratories in Tehran,Iran[J]. Iran J Pathol,2019,14(2):142-147.
[2]	LEMMENS L,KOS S,BEIJER C,et al.Optimization of laboratory procedures for intrauterine insemination:survey of methods in relation to clinical outcome[J]. Andrology,2018,6(5):707-713.
[3]	LEWIS K C,LAM I,NIEB J,et al.Inconsistent adoption of World Health Organization V(2010) semen analysis reference ranges in the United States eight years after publication[J]. Urology,2019,126:96-101.
[4]	OMBELET W,DHONT N,THIJSSEN A,et al.Semen quality and prediction of IUI success in male subfertility:a systematic review[J]. Reprod Biomed Online,2014,28(3):300-309.
[5]	BJÖRNDAHL L,BARRATT C L,MORTIMER D,et al. ‘How to count sperm properly’:checklist for acceptability of studies based on human semen analysis[J]. Hum Reprod,2016,31(2):227-232.
[6]	世界卫生组织. 世界卫生组织人类精液检查与处理实验室手册[M]. 5版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2011.
[7]	SIKKA S C,HELLSTROM W J.Current updates on laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of male reproductive failure[J]. Asian J Androl,2016,18(3):392-401.
[8]	ABOULMAKARIM S,BENBELLA A,HARDIZI H,et al.Retrospective assessment of an assisted reproductive technology method[J]. Ann Biol Clin(Paris),2018,76(1):11-21.
[9]	陆金春. 精子DNA损伤检测的临床应用价值及面临的问题[J]. 中华医学杂志,2015,95(36):2989-2993.
[10]	陆金春. 应规范男科实验室的检测项目[J]. 中华医学杂志,2018,98(46):3789-3791.
[11]	王家雄,韩慕天,沈丽燕,等. SCSA和SCD检测精子DNA完整性结果比较及与精子质量参数的相关性分析[J]. 中华男科学杂志,2017,23(4):329-336.
[12]	程兆俊,周文静,冯颖,等. PMNE复查时间的选择对男性生殖道感染患者的影响[J]. 检验医学,2018,33(5):396-398.
[13]	TALARCZYK-DESOLE J,BERGER A,TASZAREK-HAUKE G,et al.Manual vs. computer-assisted sperm analysis:can CASA replace manual assessment of human semen in clinical practice?[J]. Ginekol Pol,2017,88(2):56-60.
[14]	陆金春,李铮,夏术阶. 中国男性生育力规范化评估专家共识[M]. 北京:中国医药科技出版社,2018.
[15]	陆金春. 我国男科实验室精液分析现状与应对策略[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志,2017,5(2):65-70.
[16]	LU J C,HUANG Y F,LÜ N Q.Computer-aided sperm analysis:past,present and future[J]. Andrologia,2014,46(4):329-338.
[17]	AGARWAL A,ARAFA M,CHANDRAKUMAR R,et al.A multicenter study to evaluate oxidative stress by oxidation-reduction potential,a reliable and reproducible method[J]. Andrology,2017,5(5):939-945.
[18]	陆金春. 精液生化指标的全自动检测及临床应用[J]. 中华男科学杂志,2018,24(4):291-296.
[19]	BOE-HANSEN G B,SATAKE N. An update on boar semen assessments by flow cytometry and CASA[J]. Theriogenology,2019,137:93-103.
[20]	卢文红,谷翊群,李鸿,等. 精液分析的培训及效果评估[J]. 中华男科学杂志,2011,17(7):601-605.