Consistency of routine blood items' results in different grades of hospitals in Shanghai

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2018.12.019

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the consistency of routine blood items' results in different grades of hospitals in Shanghai.Methods Totally,2 batches of weak fixed fresh whole blood samples were transported to clinical laboratories in different grades of hospitals as required. Each batch was required determining for 5 times. The results,including the items of white blood cell（WBC） count,red blood cell（RBC） count,hemoglobin（Hb）,hematocrit（HCT） and platelet（PLT） count,were analyzed statistically.Results The coefficients of variation of WBC count,RBC count,Hb,HCT and PLT count were 3.80%-6.11%,1.22%-2.72%,0.96%-2.87%,2.54%-4.05% and 3.21%-7.25%,respectively.Conclusions The results of routine blood items of hospitals in Shanghai,especially those of Grade 2 or above,show good comparability and consistency.

Key words: Routine blood item, Comparability, Consistency

CLC Number:

R446.1

ZHU Peichao, WANG Qing, SONG Ying, XU Lei, MIAO Yingbo. Consistency of routine blood items' results in different grades of hospitals in Shanghai[J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2018, 33(12): 1140-1143.

医院级别	均值（×10⁹/L）		中位数（×10⁹/L）		标准差		变异系数（%）
医院级别	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2
二级甲等及以上	5.27	4.14	5.28	4.14	0.21	0.17	3.97	4.15
其他二级	5.29	4.17	5.28	4.18	0.22	0.2	4.19	4.7
一级	5.35	4.19	5.37	4.2	0.2	0.18	3.8	4.27
民营	5.31	4.17	5.3	4.16	0.3	0.25	5.67	6.11

医院级别	均值（×10⁹/L）		中位数（×10⁹/L）		标准差		变异系数（%）
医院级别	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2
二级甲等及以上	5.27	4.14	5.28	4.14	0.21	0.17	3.97	4.15
其他二级	5.29	4.17	5.28	4.18	0.22	0.2	4.19	4.7
一级	5.35	4.19	5.37	4.2	0.2	0.18	3.8	4.27
民营	5.31	4.17	5.3	4.16	0.3	0.25	5.67	6.11

医院级别	均值（×10⁹/L）		中位数（×10⁹/L）		标准差		变异系数（%）
医院级别	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2
二级甲等及以上	3.986	4.167	3.992	4.175	0.05	0.05	1.29	1.22
其他二级	3.948	4.138	3.948	4.144	0.08	0.10	2.15	2.40
一级	3.937	4.119	3.942	4.122	0.08	0.08	1.93	1.90
民营	3.945	4.119	3.943	4.122	0.11	0.11	2.68	2.72

医院级别	均值（×10⁹/L）		中位数（×10⁹/L）		标准差		变异系数（%）
医院级别	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2
二级甲等及以上	3.986	4.167	3.992	4.175	0.05	0.05	1.29	1.22
其他二级	3.948	4.138	3.948	4.144	0.08	0.10	2.15	2.40
一级	3.937	4.119	3.942	4.122	0.08	0.08	1.93	1.90
民营	3.945	4.119	3.943	4.122	0.11	0.11	2.68	2.72

医院级别	均值（×10⁹/L）		中位数（×10⁹/L）		标准差		变异系数（%）
医院级别	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2
二级甲等以上	122.1	126.2	122.0	126.0	1.17	1.30	0.96	1.03
其他二级	121.4	125.4	122.0	126.0	2.24	2.16	1.84	1.72
一级	121.5	125.4	121.0	125.0	2.40	2.28	1.98	1.82
民营	121.2	125.2	121.0	125.0	3.39	3.60	2.80	2.87

Consistency of routine blood items' results in different grades of hospitals in Shanghai

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 4

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

1	中国合格评定国家认可委员会. ISO 15189:2012 医学实验室质量和能力认可准则[S]. 北京:中国合格评定国家认可委员会,2012.
2	李锋,王银峰,师志云,等. 运用标准差指数和变异指数评价实验室内不同血细胞分析仪检测结果的一致性[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志,2016,4(1):37-42.
3	尚红,王毓三,申子瑜. 全国临床检验操作规程[M]. 4版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2015:1015.
4	王青,宋颖,许蕾,等. 2014年上海地区红、白细胞计数结果一致性的初步调查[J]. 检验医学,2015,30(11):1074-1077.

[1]	SU Zhenzhen, ZOU Jihua, WANG Huimin, XU Weifeng, DING Fang, ZHANG Jingmei, WANG Zhanke. Consistency of serum LDL-P and LDL-C determination results [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(2): 148-152.
[2]	YANG Xue, XU Chong, SONG Ying, ZHAO Qiang, MIAO Yingbo, WANG Qing, ZHOU Jing. Survey on the consistency of complete blood cell count results in three regions of the Yangtze River Delta,China [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 37(4): 387-391.
[3]	JU Yinghui, MO Huifang, WU Hui, CHEN Pu, GUO Wei, WANG Beili. Performance comparison of lymphocyte subset determination by 6-color flow cytometry with 2 different reagents [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 37(3): 270-273.
[4]	LIN Feiran, OU Yuanzhu, LIU Wenbin, YU Xiaoxuan, GE Danhong, ZHAO Ran. Influence of different-brand calibrators on the comparability of serum alkaline phosphatase determination results [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 37(2): 183-187.
[5]	LÜ Xianmin, YU Guoqi, CHEN Zhengzheng, JIANG Lihua, YAN Luwei, FEI Xianming. Consistency of abnormal results before and after re-determinations based on K⁺,Na⁺ and total calcium determinations [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2021, 36(8): 843-846.
[6]	LU Yinhua, ZHU Yuqing, ZHAO Xiaojun, CAO Danru, ZHU Lingfeng, GU Zhidong. Consistency of the results of anti-HCV antibody gray zone samples among different determination systems [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2021, 36(7): 700-704.
[7]	HE Yong, WANG Hui, LI Xiaoling, NIE Xin, JIANG Hong. Establishment and analysis of comparison methods among POCT blood gas analyzers [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2019, 34(8): 758-762.
[8]	MA Bing, WANG Fangfang, WANG Shanmei, ZHANG Jiangfeng, YAN Wenjuan, JING Nan, LI Yi. Performance comparison of 4 panels for in vitro drug susceptibility test of Streptococcus pneumoniae [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2019, 34(6): 547-550.
[9]	XIE Wenge, LI Wen, HUANG Ning, LI Jinxing. Analytical quality requirement of range comparison for multiple biochemical analyzers in clinical laboratories [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2018, 33(8): 760-763.
[10]	FENG Yuqing, HUANG Susu, LUO Jing, GU Guolong. Consistency rate of UF-1000i automatic urine analyzer bacterial channel and mid-stream urine culturing [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2018, 33(1): 60-62.
[11]	TANG Wenjia, WU Jiong, WANG Beili, GUO Wei, PAN Baishen. Consistency of different systems for determining lipoprotein（a） [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2017, 32(7): 566-569.
[12]	LI Jiayong, LIU Chang, WANG Hongming, ZHANG Rulin. Two enzyme methods for determining drug concentrations in biochemical instruments [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2017, 32(4): 311-315.
[13]	GUO Zonghui, CHEN Yongqiang, ZENG Fangyin. Precision and comparability assessment of Mindray H50 glycated hemoglobin A_1c analyzer [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2017, 32(3): 214-218.
[14]	WANG Qing, SONG Ying, XU Lei, ZHU Peichao, MIAO Yingbo. Survey on the comparability and consistency of whole blood cell count determination in Shanghai [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2017, 32(12): 1159-1164.
[15]	LIU Yang, PENG Daorong, MA Yueyun, CHENG Xiaodong, ZHANG Tao, WANG Jing, HAO Xiaoke. Consistency of 2 HBsAg quantitation determination systems in different HBV infection phases and different genotypes [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2016, 31(4): 288-292.

医院级别	均值（×10⁹/L）		中位数（×10⁹/L）		标准差		变异系数（%）
医院级别	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2
二级甲等及以上	37.81	38.49	37.71	38.35	0.96	0.88	2.54	2.30
其他二级	37.57	38.36	37.48	38.24	1.39	1.43	3.70	3.72
一级	37.37	37.99	37.51	38.08	1.34	1.25	3.58	3.29
民营	36.97	37.66	36.94	37.61	1.47	1.53	3.98	4.05

医院级别	均值（×10⁹/L）		中位数（×10⁹/L）		标准差		变异系数（%）
医院级别	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2
二级甲等及以上	37.81	38.49	37.71	38.35	0.96	0.88	2.54	2.30
其他二级	37.57	38.36	37.48	38.24	1.39	1.43	3.70	3.72
一级	37.37	37.99	37.51	38.08	1.34	1.25	3.58	3.29
民营	36.97	37.66	36.94	37.61	1.47	1.53	3.98	4.05

医院级别	均值（×10⁹/L）		中位数（×10⁹/L）		标准差		变异系数（%）
医院级别	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2
二级甲等及以上	202.2	146.6	202.6	147.2	6.80	4.70	3.36	3.21
其他二级	201.5	146.5	200.7	146.4	8.84	6.83	4.39	4.66
一级	200.7	146.9	200.6	146.2	8.52	7.19	4.24	4.90
民营	198.27	146.47	199.20	146.10	14.37	10.27	7.25	7.01

医院级别	均值（×10⁹/L）		中位数（×10⁹/L）		标准差		变异系数（%）
医院级别	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2	批号1	批号2
二级甲等及以上	202.2	146.6	202.6	147.2	6.80	4.70	3.36	3.21
其他二级	201.5	146.5	200.7	146.4	8.84	6.83	4.39	4.66
一级	200.7	146.9	200.6	146.2	8.52	7.19	4.24	4.90
民营	198.27	146.47	199.20	146.10	14.37	10.27	7.25	7.01