Laboratory Medicine ›› 2015, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 284-286.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2015.03.020

• Orginal Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Result analysis of various detection methods for homocysteine

ZHAO Yan, KANG Fengfeng, WANG Wei, HE Falin, ZHONG Kun, WANG Zhiguo   

  1. National Center for Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Hospital, Ministry of Health, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2014-06-09 Online:2015-03-30 Published:2015-04-16

Abstract: Objective

To evaluate the results of various detection methods for homocysteine (Hcy).

Methods

The internal quality control (IQC ) information of 110 laboratories from National Center for Clinical Laboratory (NCCL) was collected. The imprecision [coefficient of variation (CV)] of Hcy was analyzed. Bias was estimated according to various detection methods in NCCL External Quality Assessment (EQA) in 2012 through online EQA platform. With current evaluation criteria for EQA(TEa=20%), sigma (σ) value of each laboratory was calculated as the formula: σ= (TEa-bias)/CV. Furthermore, the passing rates and inter-laboratory CV for each group were evaluated.

Results

The proportions of σ>6, 3<σ≤6, 0<σ≤3 and σ≤0 by chemiluminescence, immunoturbidimetry and enzymatic cycling were 0%, 7.69%, 30.77%, 61.54%;9.09%, 0%, 63.64%, 27.27% and 11.63%, 31.40% 47.67%, 9.30%, respectively. The inter-laboratory CV by the 3 methods for 5-run quality control materials were 33.66%-43.77%, 19.54%-25.24% and 10.46%-14.21%, and the passing rates were 53.3%, 53.3%-80.0% and 85.9%-92.3%.

Conclusions

Laboratories in China need further efforts to improve the performance of Hcy detection.

Key words: Homocysteine, 6 sigma, Sigma metric, Imprecision, Bias

CLC Number: