›› 2014, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 741-744.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2014.07.012

• Orignal Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Correlation analysis of SYSMEX XE-5000 hematology analyzer in counting platelet

ZHANG Weihong,CHEN Bin,CAI Mengshan,LI Jieqiu,CHEN Yingzi,HUANG Lesheng   

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Guangzhou First People′ s Hospital, Guangzhou Medical College, Guangdong Guangzhou 510180, China
  • Received:2014-03-17 Online:2014-07-30 Published:2014-07-21

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the accuracy of plateletPLT counting which was influenced by erythrocyte fragmentsFRC), red blood cell volumeMCV), PLT parameters [platelet distribution widthPDW), platelet-larger cell ratioP-LCR and platelet hematocritPCT] and immature plateletsIPF by SYSMEX XE-5000 hematology analyzerXE-5000. Methods The 200 samples with no FRC were analyzed by XE-5000 and were classified into 4 groups and each group of 50 cases: A1 groupMCV60 fL), B1 group60 fL≤MCV70 fL), C1 group70 fL≤MCV80 fL and D1 groupMCV ≥ 80 fL), respectively. The samples with FRC of different concentrations and MCV ≥70 fL were classified into 2 groups and each group of 40 cases: A2 group0.1%≤FRC≤0.99% and B2 groupFRC≥1.0%), respectively. The samples of 50 cases with no FRC MCV≥70 fL and PLT parametersPDW PCT and P-LCR showed "-"C2 group were chosen. PLT counting was performed in the 330 cases and determined for microscopy by electrical impedance analysis optics and manual method. One case of naive patients with thrombocythemia was continuously observed for 5 d by electrical impedance analysis optics and manual method. Results There were significant differences between electrical impedance analysis and manual method from A1 A2 B1 B2 and C2 groupsP0.05. It showed no statistical significance between electrical impedance analysis and manual method from C1 and D1 groupsP0.05. It showed no statistical significance between optics and manual method from A1 B1 C1 D1 A2 B2 and C2 groupsP0.05. One case of naive patients with thrombocythemia was continuously observed for 5 d by the 3 methods respectively. The results of electrical impedance analysis were less than those of optics and manual method. The results of manual method were relatively stable and the results of electrical impedance analysis and optics increased with the mature of PLT. There existed giant PLT by microscopy. Conclusions When the samples of MCV 70 fL FRC and PLT parameters shows "-" by XE-5000 and it should be measured by optics and smear microscopy. While the specimens with high IPF and many giant PLT under microscopy they should be detected by manual method.

Key words: Red blood cell volume, Erythrocyte fragment, Platelet parameter, Immature platelet, Platelet counting

CLC Number: