检验医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 1004-1011.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2026.10.011
收稿日期:2025-01-23
修回日期:2025-10-11
出版日期:2026-10-30
发布日期:2026-10-20
通讯作者:
王秋波,E-mail:wangqiubo2020@suda.edu.cn。
作者简介:程国伟,男,1982年生,学士,副主任技师,主要从事临床检验相关工作。
基金资助:
CHENG Guowei, LIU Qingyang, WANG Qiubo(
)
Received:2025-01-23
Revised:2025-10-11
Online:2026-10-30
Published:2026-10-20
摘要:
目的 探讨整合素α4(ITGA4)诊断类风湿关节炎(RA)的价值,并采用RA患者滑膜成纤维细胞(RA-FLS)探讨其生物学功能。方法 选取2023年3月—2024年12月无锡市第九人民医院RA患者85例(RA组)和健康体检者100名(正常对照组)。收集所有研究对象的临床资料,并检测外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)中ITGA4的表达情况。分离并培养来源于RA患者的RA-FLS细胞,以甲氨蝶呤作为对照,使用ITGA4抑制剂(Carotegrast)处理细胞,检测Carotegrast干预后RA-FLS细胞的增殖、凋亡、周期、转移侵袭情况和白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)的表达情况。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价关键基因对RA的诊断效能。采用Spearman分析评估ITGA4相对表达量与疾病活动指数28(DAS28)-类风湿因子(ESR)评分的相关性。结果 RA组PBMC中ITGA4相对表达量显著高于正常对照组(P<0.01)。ITGA4相对表达量诊断RA的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.672。ITGA4相对表达量与DAS28-ESR评分呈正相关(r=0.266 4,P=0.002 3)。Carotegrast干预后,RA-FLS的细胞增殖、细胞周期和迁移侵袭能力均受到抑制,细胞凋亡被促进。Carotegrast可有效抑制RA-FLS细胞中IL-1β、IL-6和TNF-α的表达。结论 RA患者PBMC中ITGA4表达显著升高,且与RA严重程度相关。ITGA4或可作为潜在的RA诊疗靶点。
中图分类号:
程国伟, 刘庆阳, 王秋波. 外周血单个核细胞中整合素α4对类风湿关节炎中的诊断价值及其生物学功能[J]. 检验医学, 2026, 41(10): 1004-1011.
CHENG Guowei, LIU Qingyang, WANG Qiubo. Diagnostic value and biological function of integrin alpha 4 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2026, 41(10): 1004-1011.
| 基因名称 | 正向引物(5´~3´) | 反向引物(5´~3´) |
|---|---|---|
| ITGA4 | GAACCGATGGCTCCTAGTGG | GAAAGTGTGACCCCCAACCA |
| TNF-α | GTGCTTGTTCCTCAGCCTCT | ATGGGCTACAGGCTTGTCAC |
| IL-1β | CCAGCTACGAATCTCCGACC | TCGTGCACATAAGCCTCGTT |
| IL-6 | AGAGGCACTGGCAGAAAACA | GCTCTGGCTTGTTCCTCACT |
| GAPDH | GTCAAGGCTGAGAACGGGAA | AAATGAGCCCCAGCCTTCTC |
表1 引物序列
| 基因名称 | 正向引物(5´~3´) | 反向引物(5´~3´) |
|---|---|---|
| ITGA4 | GAACCGATGGCTCCTAGTGG | GAAAGTGTGACCCCCAACCA |
| TNF-α | GTGCTTGTTCCTCAGCCTCT | ATGGGCTACAGGCTTGTCAC |
| IL-1β | CCAGCTACGAATCTCCGACC | TCGTGCACATAAGCCTCGTT |
| IL-6 | AGAGGCACTGGCAGAAAACA | GCTCTGGCTTGTTCCTCACT |
| GAPDH | GTCAAGGCTGAGAACGGGAA | AAATGAGCCCCAGCCTTCTC |
| 项目 | 例数 | 年龄/岁 | 性别 | BMI/(kg·m-2) | RF/ (U·mL-1) | 抗CCP抗体/(U·mL-1) | ESR/(mm·h-1) | 病程/年 | DAS28评分/分 | 使用DMARD/[例(%)] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男/例 | 女/例 | ||||||||||
| RA组 | 85 | 58.04±1.33 | 33 | 52 | 23.09±0.43 | 28.54±6.33 | 8.42±2.42 | 20.61±5.87 | 4.20±1.03 | 3.17±0.95 | 76 |
| 正常对照组 | 100 | 55.53±2.61 | 32 | 68 | 22.33±0.53 | 7.8±1.03 | 1.62±0.76 | ||||
| 统计值 | 1.55 | 0.288 | 2.43 | 28.74 | 24.63 | ||||||
| P值 | 0.54 | 0.34 | 0.76 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||||
表2 RA组和正常对照组临床资料比较
| 项目 | 例数 | 年龄/岁 | 性别 | BMI/(kg·m-2) | RF/ (U·mL-1) | 抗CCP抗体/(U·mL-1) | ESR/(mm·h-1) | 病程/年 | DAS28评分/分 | 使用DMARD/[例(%)] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男/例 | 女/例 | ||||||||||
| RA组 | 85 | 58.04±1.33 | 33 | 52 | 23.09±0.43 | 28.54±6.33 | 8.42±2.42 | 20.61±5.87 | 4.20±1.03 | 3.17±0.95 | 76 |
| 正常对照组 | 100 | 55.53±2.61 | 32 | 68 | 22.33±0.53 | 7.8±1.03 | 1.62±0.76 | ||||
| 统计值 | 1.55 | 0.288 | 2.43 | 28.74 | 24.63 | ||||||
| P值 | 0.54 | 0.34 | 0.76 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 项目 | AUC(95%CI) | 最佳临界值 | 敏感性/% | 特异性/% | Youden指数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITGA4 mRNA | 0.672(0.596~0.748) | 1.017 | 61.2 | 70.0 | 0.312 |
| RF | 0.840(0.782~0.898) | 9.703 | 74.7 | 82.7 | 0.574 |
| 抗CCP抗体 | 0.720(0.649~0.791) | 4.946 | 52.9 | 94.0 | 0.469 |
表3 PBMC中ITGA4 mRNA和血清RF、抗CCP抗体诊断RA的效能
| 项目 | AUC(95%CI) | 最佳临界值 | 敏感性/% | 特异性/% | Youden指数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITGA4 mRNA | 0.672(0.596~0.748) | 1.017 | 61.2 | 70.0 | 0.312 |
| RF | 0.840(0.782~0.898) | 9.703 | 74.7 | 82.7 | 0.574 |
| 抗CCP抗体 | 0.720(0.649~0.791) | 4.946 | 52.9 | 94.0 | 0.469 |
| 组别 | 细胞凋亡率/% | 细胞周期 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G0/G1期/% | S期 | G2/M期/% | ||
| 对照组 | 11.51±3.54 | 70.03±1.04 | 11.05±1.22 | 9.34±1.33 |
| 阳性对照组 | 13.04±2.68 | 76.23±0.99* | 10.56±1.55 | 3.23±0.65* |
| 低Carotegrast组 | 17.22±4.64 | 70.02±1.45 | 11.03±1.34 | 8.88±1.02 |
| 高Carotegrast组 | 17.81±3.01 | 79.23±1.12* | 12.06±0.88 | 5.44±0.86* |
表4 各组细胞凋亡率和细胞周期变化的比较
| 组别 | 细胞凋亡率/% | 细胞周期 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G0/G1期/% | S期 | G2/M期/% | ||
| 对照组 | 11.51±3.54 | 70.03±1.04 | 11.05±1.22 | 9.34±1.33 |
| 阳性对照组 | 13.04±2.68 | 76.23±0.99* | 10.56±1.55 | 3.23±0.65* |
| 低Carotegrast组 | 17.22±4.64 | 70.02±1.45 | 11.03±1.34 | 8.88±1.02 |
| 高Carotegrast组 | 17.81±3.01 | 79.23±1.12* | 12.06±0.88 | 5.44±0.86* |
| [1] | Jang S, Kwon E J, Lee J J. Rheumatoid arthritis:pathogenic roles of diverse immune cells[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(2). |
| [2] | Chastney M R, Conway J R W, Ivaska J. Integrin adhesion complexes[J]. Curr Biol, 2021, 31(10):R536-R542. |
| [3] |
Aman J, Margadant C. Integrin-dependent cell-matrix adhesion in endothelial health and disease[J]. Circ Res, 2023, 132(3):355-378.
DOI PMID |
| [4] |
Rossi B, Dusi S, Angelini G, et al. Alpha4 beta7 integrin controls Th17 cell trafficking in the spinal cord leptomeninges during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis[J]. Front Immunol, 2023, 14:1071553.
DOI URL |
| [5] | Calma A D, Young S, Sandbach J, et al. Targeting alpha-4 integrin with natalizumab for intermediate uveitis associated with multiple sclerosis[J]. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin, 2024, 10(4):20552173241301034. |
| [6] |
Matsouka K, Watanabe M, Ohmori T, et al. AJM300(carotegrast methyl),an oral antagonist of alpha4-integrin,as induction therapy for patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis:a multicentre,randomised,double-blind,placebo-controlled,phase 3 study[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2022, 7(7):648-657.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
Alsadhan A, Chen J, Gaglione E M, et al. CD49d expression identifies a biologically distinct subtype of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with inferior progression-free survival on BTK inhibitor therapy[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2023, 29(18):3612-3621.
DOI URL |
| [8] | 中华医学会风湿病学分会. 2018中国类风湿关节炎诊疗指南[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2018, 57(4):42-51. |
| [9] |
Prevoo M L, Van'T Hof M A, Kuper H H, et al. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1995, 38(1):44-48.
DOI URL |
| [10] | Van Riel P L, Renskers L. The disease activity score(DAS) and the disease activity score using 28 joint counts(DAS28) in the management of rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2016, 34(5Suppl 101): S40-S44. |
| [11] |
Wu Z, Ma D, Yang H, et al. Fibroblast-like synoviocytes in rheumatoid arthritis:surface markers and phenotypes[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2021, 93:107392.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
Alivernini S, Firesteun G S, Mcinnes I B. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Immunity, 2022, 55(12):2255-2270.
DOI PMID |
| [13] |
Venetsanopoulou A I, Alamanos Y, Voulgari P V, et al. Epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis:genetic and environmental influences[J]. Expert Rev Clin Immunol, 2022, 18(9):923-931.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
Cush J J. Rheumatoid arthritis:early diagnosis and treatment[J]. Rheum Dis Clin North Am, 2022, 48(2):537-547.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
Sepriano A, Kerschbaumer A, Bergstra S A, et al. Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs:a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2023, 82(1):107-118.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
Polman C H, O'Connor P W, Havrdova E, et al. A randomized,placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 354(9):899-910.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
Feagan B G, Greenberg G R, Wild G, et al. Treatment of ulcerative colitis with a humanized antibody to the alpha4beta7 integrin[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 352(24):2499-2507.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
Khoy K, Mariotte D, Defer G, et al. Natalizumab in multiple sclerosis treatment:from biological effects to immune monitoring[J]. Front Immunol, 2020, 11:549842.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
Ohmori T. Real-world effectiveness and safety of carotegrast methyl in Japanese patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis[J]. Inflamm Intest Dis, 2024, 9(1):271-282.
DOI PMID |
| [20] |
Chu H W, Schaunaman N. Very late antigen-4:a novel receptor for club cell secretory protein 16 to control inflammation[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2021, 203(11):1340-1341.
DOI URL |
| [21] | Savino W, Chaves B, Bonomo A C, et al. Integrin-directed antibody-based immunotherapy:focus on VLA-4[J]. Immunother Adv, 2021, 1(1):ltab002. |
| [22] |
Barbadillo C, Ag A, Salas C, et al. Anti-integrin immunotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis:protective effect of anti-alpha 4 antibody in adjuvant arthritis[J]. Springer Semin Immunopathol, 1995, 16(4):427-436.
PMID |
| [23] |
Birner U, Issekutz T B, Walter U, et al. The role of alpha(4) and LFA-1 integrins in selectin-independent monocyte and neutrophil migration to joints of rats with adjuvant arthritis[J]. Int Immunol, 2000, 12(2):141-150.
PMID |
| [24] |
Dhillon S. Carotegrast methyl:first approval[J]. Drugs, 2022, 82(9):1011-1016.
DOI |
| [25] | Takeuchi E, Tanaka T, Umemoto E, et al. VLA-4-dependent and -independent pathways in cell contact-induced proinflammatory cytokine production by synovial nurse-like cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients[J]. Arthritis Res, 2002, 4(6):R10. |
| [26] | Kondo N, Kuroda T, Kobayashi D. Cytokine networks in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(20). |
| [27] |
Ran Y, Dong Y, LI Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell aggregation mediated by integrin alpha4/VCAM-1 after intrathecal transplantation in MCAO rats[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2022, 13(1):507.
DOI PMID |
| [28] |
Dong M, Wang W, Wu W, et al. A novel surface marker CD49d promotes TNF expression in oyster agranulocytes by mediating the MAPK pathway[J]. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2024, 151:109702.
DOI URL |
| [29] | Takeda T, Tsubak M, Genno S, et al. CD49d and CD49e induce cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance through the nuclear factor-kappaB pathway in Burkitt lymphoma[J]. J Physiol Pharmacol, 2020, 71(4). |
| [1] | 王克迪, 张睿宜, 徐东江. 不同类型样本EB病毒核酸定量检测诊断儿童传染性单核细胞增多症的效能[J]. 检验医学, 2026, 41(7): 696-699. |
| [2] | 王丽, 唐玲, 金亚雄, 张君龙, 高雪丹, 牛倩. LDH、MO#和LMR在RA-ILD鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 检验医学, 2025, 40(6): 525-533. |
| [3] | 罗静, 袁佳仪, 姚小艳, 范列英. RA患者外周血单核细胞亚型中组织蛋白酶C表达的变化[J]. 检验医学, 2025, 40(10): 933-940. |
| [4] | 张菲斐, 王婧雯, 张跃欣, 郑大炜, 门翔. COPD患者lncRNA MIR155HG表达与肺功能的相关性及其对AECODP的辅助诊断价值[J]. 检验医学, 2024, 39(1): 31-36. |
| [5] | 刘庆阳, 袁建明, 夏进军, 姜风英, 王秋波, 王晓明. 基于GEO数据库和临床样本验证CXCL9作为类风湿关节炎生物标志物的研究[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(12): 1121-1129. |
| [6] | 杨艳敏, 彭梦乐, 连文萍. 直肠癌患者MDSC百分比和RORα mRNA、IL-17E mRNA、FOXP3 mRNA表达的临床意义[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(1): 23-27. |
| [7] | 何亚亚, 陈闪闪, 李永胜, 刘娟. AS患者sLAIR-1和LAIR-1 mRNA的表达及其与疾病活动度的关系[J]. 检验医学, 2022, 37(10): 915-920. |
| [8] | 苏曦, 周琰, 沈敏娜, 李懿皞, 王蓓丽, 潘柏申, 郭玮. 不同样本类型对EBV DNA检测结果的影响[J]. 检验医学, 2020, 35(8): 803-805. |
| [9] | 王春玮, 蔡星垚, 张世宽, 郭景景. 不同样本中EBV DNA检出率的差异[J]. 检验医学, 2019, 34(8): 763-764. |
| [10] | 王星, 马岩, 王胜男, 张鹤骞, 刘熔增. TIM-3 rs1036199基因多态性与类风湿关节炎发病风险相关性Meta分析[J]. 检验医学, 2019, 34(12): 1101-1106. |
| [11] | 陆兴热, 陈凤羽, 资云菊, 刘孝文, 袁雕, 何祥, 陆昱, 朱德永. 抗CCP抗体、AKA和GPI抗原对类风湿关节炎的诊断价值[J]. 检验医学, 2019, 34(12): 1145-1146. |
| [12] | 张翠. 微小RNA-132和高迁移率族蛋白1在脓毒症患儿外周血单个核细胞中的表达及临床意义[J]. 检验医学, 2018, 33(9): 815-818. |
| [13] | 丁冰玉, 林萍, 李擎天. 植物血凝素刺激外周血单个核细胞Th1/Th2细胞因子分泌对阿尔茨海默病的诊断价值[J]. 检验医学, 2018, 33(4): 290-294. |
| [14] | 李云春, 钟利, 王悦, 方忠俊, 丁柳美, 苏启柱. 类风湿性关节炎患者红细胞体积分布宽度及相关炎性因子与病情活动度的相关性[J]. 检验医学, 2017, 32(4): 304-307. |
| [15] | 曾惠琼, 扶忠超, 黄新民, 尹志华, 叶志中. D-二聚体、纤维蛋白原、转铁蛋白水平对类风湿关节炎的临床意义[J]. 检验医学, 2017, 32(10): 883-885. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||