创伤性骨折患者血糖和糖化血清蛋白检测价值比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2015.02.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的

通过检测急性创伤性骨折后血糖(Glu)和糖化血清蛋白(GSP)变化,了解创伤后患者Glu升高是糖尿病还是创伤后机体的应激反应所致。

方法

将87例急性创伤性骨折患者按入院时有无2型糖尿病分为创伤性骨折已知糖尿病组(17例)、创伤性骨折未知糖尿病组(22例,入院后确诊有糖尿病)、创伤性骨折无糖尿病组(48例),于入院时和治愈出院时分别采集患者外周血,采用葡萄糖氧化酶法和果糖胺法检测Glu和GSP水平。以30名健康体检者作为正常对照组。

结果

急性创伤性骨折各组入院时Glu水平均明显高于正常对照组(P均<0.05),以创伤性骨折未知糖尿病组升高最为明显,各组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);创伤性骨折未知糖尿病组GSP水平高于其余3组(P均<0.05),而创伤性骨折已知糖尿病组、创伤性骨折无糖尿病组和正常对照组之间GSP水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。急性创伤性骨折各组治愈出院时Glu水平均恢复正常;而创伤性骨折未知糖尿病组由于前期的高Glu导致GSP升高,因此,GSP结果仍明显高于创伤性骨折已知糖尿病组、创伤性骨折无糖尿病组和正常对照组(P均<0.05)。创伤性骨折无糖尿病组治愈出院时Glu水平明显低于入院时(P<0.05),而GSP水平治愈出院时和入院时无明显差异(P>0.05)。

结论

Glu检测可以作为急性创伤性骨折患者监测病情、评估预后的一种方法。GSP检测结果可以作为鉴别急性创伤性骨折患者Glu升高是属于应激性反应还是糖尿病性升高的重要依据。

关键词: 血糖, 糖化血清蛋白, 创伤, 骨折, 急性, 2型糖尿病

Abstract: Objective

To study the fact of blood glucose (Glu) rising being the result of diabetes mellitus or post-traumatic stress response of body through detecting the changes of Glu and glycated serum protein (GSP).

Methods

The 87 patients with acute traumatic fracture were classified into 3 groups according to the presence or absence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, traumatic fracture with diabetes group(17 cases), traumatic fracture with unknown diabetes group (22 cases diagnosed as diabetes after hospitalization) and traumatic fracture without diabetes group (48 cases). The Glu and GSP levels of each group were measured by glucose oxidase method and fructosamine assay when hospitalized and cured. A total of 30 healthy subjects were enrolled as healthy controls.

Results

The Glu levels of acute traumatic fracture groups were significantly higher than that of control group (P<0.05), especially traumatic fracture with unknown diabetes group, and there was statistical significance (P<0.05). The level of GSP of traumatic fracture with unknown diabetes group was higher than those of the other 3 groups (P<0.05), while the GSP levels of the other 3 groups had no statistical significance (P>0.05). The Glu level of acute traumatic fracture groups returned to normal level when cured, while the GSP level of traumatic fracture with unknown diabetes group increased and was significantly higher than those of the other 3 groups (P<0.05), due to high level of Glu. The Glu level of traumatic fracture without diabetes group when cured was significantly lower than that when hospitalized (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference for GSP level (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The detection of Glu could be used as a method of monitoring and evaluating the prognosis of acute traumatic fracture. GSP level could be the important reference of distinguishing Glu rising because of diabetes mellitus or post-traumatic stress response of body.

Key words: Blood glucose, Glycated serum protein, Trauma, Fracture, Acute, Type 2 diabetes mellitus

中图分类号:

R446.1

李晓楠, 刘军权. 创伤性骨折患者血糖和糖化血清蛋白检测价值比较[J]. 检验医学, 2015, 30(2): 152-155.

LI Xiaonan, LIU Junquan. Comparison on the detection significance of blood glucose and glycated serum protein among traumatic fracture patients[J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2015, 30(2): 152-155.

图/表 1

参考文献 13

[1]	许太武,丁玉兴,李晓亮,等.创伤患者急性期血糖含量与血压、血氧饱和度的对比研究[J].中国危重病急救医学,1996,8(10):30-31.
[2]	HERNANDEZ RK, DO TP, CRITCHLOW CW,et al.Patient-related risk factors for fracture-healing complications in the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database[J]. Acta Orthop,2012,83(6):653-660.
[3]	SPANHEIMER RG,UMPIERREZ GE,STUMPF V.Decreased collagen production in diabetic rats[J].Diabetes,2001,37(4):371-376.
[4]	BEAM HA,PARSONS JR,LIN SS.The effects of blood glucose control upon fracture heating in the BB Wistar rat with diabetes mellitus[J]. J Orthop Res,2002,20(6):1210-1216.
[5]	ALBLOWI J,TIAN C,SIQUEIRA MF, et al.Chemokine expression is upregulated in chondrocytes in diabetic fracture healing[J]. Bone,2013,53(1):294-300.
[6]	CHO TJ, GERSTENFELD LC,EINHORN TA.Differential temporal expressionof members of the transforming growth factor beta superfamily during murine fracture healing[J]. J Bone Miner Res,2002,17(3):513-520.
[7]	李溪,向盈盈,龚跃昆,等. 糖尿病骨折大鼠骨痂组织中成骨细胞增殖和骨钙素表达与骨形态发生蛋白2干预的关系[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床,2009,13(20):3957-3861.
[8]	PAN LH,LI XF,WANG MN,et al.Comparison of hypoglycemic and antioxidative effects of polysaccharides from four different Dendrobium species[J]. Int J Biol Macromol,2014,64:420-427.
[9]	SIMPSON CM,CALORI GM,GIANNOUDIS PV.Diabetes and fracture healing: the skeletal effects of diabetic drugs[J]. Expert Opin Drug Saf,2012,11(2):215-220.
[10]	NORRIS R,PARKER M.Diabetes mellitus and hip fracture: a study of 5 966 cases[J]. Injury,2011,42(11):1313-1316.
[11]	徐晓萍,陈惠雯,于嘉屏. 糖化血清蛋白检测对糖尿病监测的意义[J]. 检验医学,2006,21(2):136-139.
[12]	赵海燕,王响,武丽芬,等. 糖化血清蛋白试剂盒抗干扰能力的改进[J]. 检验医学,2010,25(3):247-248.
[13]	朱浩稳,邹国英,张裕. 脑创伤应激性高血糖与预后的关系[J]. 现代检验医学杂志,2004,19(5):52-53.

组别	例数	入院时		治愈出院时
组别	例数	Glu	GSP	Glu	GSP
创伤性骨折组	87
已知糖尿病组	17	8.62±0.78^*	2.20±0.35^#	5.29±0.51^△	2.33±0.25^#
未知糖尿病组	22	11.24±0.76^*	3.35±0.45	6.03±0.55^△	3.34±0.36
无糖尿病组	48	8.22±0.83^*	2.16±0.25^#	5.25±0.43^△	2.24±0.26^#
正常对照组	30	5.13±0.85	2.15±0.32^#	5.13±0.54	2.15±0.32^#

组别	例数	入院时		治愈出院时
组别	例数	Glu	GSP	Glu	GSP
创伤性骨折组	87
已知糖尿病组	17	8.62±0.78^*	2.20±0.35^#	5.29±0.51^△	2.33±0.25^#
未知糖尿病组	22	11.24±0.76^*	3.35±0.45	6.03±0.55^△	3.34±0.36
无糖尿病组	48	8.22±0.83^*	2.16±0.25^#	5.25±0.43^△	2.24±0.26^#
正常对照组	30	5.13±0.85	2.15±0.32^#	5.13±0.54	2.15±0.32^#

[1]	伏艺, 杨雪松, 金立钢, 翟红礼, 金小玲. sd-LDL-C与ACS患者远期不良心血管事件发生的相关性[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(9): 878-883.
[2]	赵沱, 白鹏飞, 孙婧, 程涛. 血清lncRNA NEAT1在急性心肌梗死患者中的表达及其临床意义[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(9): 897-900.
[3]	赵静, 李永勤, 李艳, 范伟光, 杨学刚. HIV/AIDS合并机会性感染患者IP-10、SAA、hs-CRP、PCT、CD4⁺ T细胞计数检测的意义[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(8): 725-729.
[4]	刘丹, 李建英, 王庚, 吴卫. 因血常规MCHC增高行镜检发现急性髓系白血病1例报道[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(8): 805-806.
[5]	汪海平, 李贺. BISAP评分联合血清sRAGE评估急性高脂血症性胰腺炎严重程度和短期预后的价值[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(7): 653-658.
[6]	王腾飞, 陈珊, 安和兵, 周蕾. 急性白血病患者外周血lncRNA CRNDE、miR-384表达及其临床意义[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(7): 686-691.
[7]	陈丹阳, 郑思钰, 郑锐林, 苏静瑶, 朱冰, 李英华. 流感病毒研究进展[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(7): 696-703.
[8]	张春玲, 蔺丽慧, 王小蕊, 丁静, 李莉. 成人KMT2A/MLLT6阳性急性髓系白血病1例报道并文献复习[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(7): 704-706.
[9]	原野, 刘涛, 刘华. 涎液化糖链抗原-6与Standford A型主动脉夹层患者发生急性肺损伤的关系[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(6): 543-547.
[10]	吴曹荣, 崔雯, 汤滨滨, 贺晶晶, 赖志昆. C反应蛋白/前白蛋白比值与急性心力衰竭患者预后的相关性[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(6): 579-583.
[11]	梁焯辉, 赵凡, 刘倩雯. 巨噬细胞移动抑制因子与老年2型糖尿病患者颈动脉血管钙化的关系[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(5): 460-465.
[12]	邓旭, 庄文龙, 薛慧, 朱淑芹, 李颖. 中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值、纤维蛋白原与2型糖尿病患者颈动脉内中膜厚度的关系[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(4): 368-372.
[13]	刘俊闪, 郭明发, 孙佳, 史利欢, 刘炜, 段勇涛. 微量残留病监测在ETV6/RUNX1阴性和阳性急性B淋巴细胞白血病患儿预后中的意义[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(3): 209-214.
[14]	王雅玲, 黄运丽, 田密, 王顺兰, 肖莉. 急性支气管肺炎患儿EOS%、CCR3、Eotaxin与病情严重程度的关系[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(3): 230-234.
[15]	武晋英, 方玉莲, 王维, 侯梦珠, 王露, 赵煜. 天津地区急性腹泻患儿肠道病毒感染临床特征和流行病学分析[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(3): 267-271.