BD BACTEC 9240全自动血液培养系统在检测血流感染病原菌的影响因素评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2013.07.012

检验医学 ›› 2013, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (7): 606-610.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2013.07.012

• 技术研究与评价.论著 • 上一篇下一篇

BD BACTEC 9240全自动血液培养系统在检测血流感染病原菌的影响因素评价

汤瑾, 王坚镪, 陈瑜, 高锋

上海交通大学附属第六人民医院检验科,上海 200233

收稿日期:2013-03-25 修回日期:2013-07-29 出版日期:2013-07-25 发布日期:2013-07-29
通讯作者: 高锋,联系电话:021-24058702
作者简介:汤瑾,女,1975年生,硕士,副主任技师,主要研究方向是微生物致病机理。

Evaluation on the influence factor on pathogen detection of bloodstream infection by BD BACTEC 9240 automated blood culture system

TANG Jin,WANG Jianqiang,CHEN Yu,GAO Feng

Department of Clinical Laboratory,Shanghai Sixth People′s Hospital,Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200233,China

Received:2013-03-25 Revised:2013-07-29 Online:2013-07-25 Published:2013-07-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的评价BD BACTEC 9240全自动血液培养系统检测血流感染病原菌的影响因素。方法回顾性调查BD BACTEC 9240全自动血液培养系统的检测结果,分析双侧血培养的检出率;体外模拟血培养评价抗菌药物治疗浓度及送检时间对血培养结果的影响。结果双侧血培养可以提高血流感染的检出率;体外模拟血培养结果显示,大肠埃希菌和金黄色葡萄球菌在庆大霉素、头孢噻肟、万古霉素、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦及左氧氟沙星的治疗浓度中能被检测,在亚胺培南的治疗浓度中不能被检测;肺炎链球菌在所选抗菌药物的治疗浓度中均不能被检测;送检时间不会影响血培养的检测结果,但会缩短血培养的阳性检测时间(TTD)。结论双侧血培养能提高血流感染的检出率;抗菌药物治疗浓度会抑制血培养中部分病原菌的生长而导致假阴性;送检时间不会影响血培养的检测结果,但会改变TTD;TTD易受多种因素影响而不能反映血流感染的带菌量。

关键词: 血流感染, 血培养, 阳性检测时间, 抗菌药物, 治疗浓度

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the influence factor on pathogen detection of blood stream infection by BD BACTEC 9240 automated blood culture system. Methods The results of BD BACTEC 9240 automated blood culture system was studied retrospectively, and the pathogen detection rate in double sets of blood culture was analyzed. The influences of antibiotic therapeutic concentration and delivery time were evaluated in simulated blood cultures in vitro. Results Double sets of blood culture can increase the detection rate of bloodstream infection. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus could be detected in therapeutic concentrations of gentamicin, cefotaxime, vancomycin, piperacillin / tazobactam and levofloxacin in simulated blood cultures in vitro, but be not detected by imipenem therapeutic concentration. Streptococcus pneumoniae was inhibited by the selected antibiotic therapeutic concentration. Delivery time would not affect the pathogen detection, but decreased the time to detection(TTD) in blood cultures. Conclusions Double sets of blood culture can increase the detection rate of bloodstream infection. Antibiotics would inhibit some pathogen growth in blood cultures, leading false negative. Delivery time would not affect pathogen detection, but would change TTD. TTD is effected by many factors, could not be a surrogate for the initial bacterial concentration in bloodstream infection.

Key words: Bloodstream infection, Blood culture, Time to detection, Antibiotic therapeutic concentration

中图分类号:

R446.11

汤瑾, 王坚镪, 陈瑜, 高锋. BD BACTEC 9240全自动血液培养系统在检测血流感染病原菌的影响因素评价[J]. 检验医学, 2013, 28(7): 606-610.

TANG Jin,WANG Jianqiang,CHEN Yu,GAO Feng. Evaluation on the influence factor on pathogen detection of bloodstream infection by BD BACTEC 9240 automated blood culture system[J]. , 2013, 28(7): 606-610.

参考文献

[1] Baddour LM,Wilson WR,Bayer AS,et al. Infective endocarditis: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association: endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America [J]. Circulation,2005,111(23):e394-e434.

[2] Weinstein MP,Towns ML, Quartey SM, et al. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective, comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology,epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults[J]. Clin Infect Dis,1997,24(4):584-602.

[3] Everts RJ,Vinson EN,Adholla P,et al. Contamination of catheter-drawn blood cultures[J].J Clin Microbiol,2001,39(9):3393-3394.

[4] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute . Principles and procedures for blood cultures[S] . M47-A, CLSI,2010.

[5] Richter S,Beekmann SE,Croco JL,et al. Minimizing the workup of blood culture contaminants: implementation and evaluation of a laboratory-based algorithm[J]. J Clin Microbiol,2002,40(7):2437-2444.

[6] 王坚镪,汤瑾,庄亦晖,等.双套血培养对提高血流感染检出率和鉴别污染的评价[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2012,12(6):440-442.

[7] Janapatla RP,Yan JJ,Chien ML,et al. Effect of overnight storage of blood culture bottles on bacterial detection time in the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system [J]. J Microbiol Immunol Infect,2010,43(2):126-132.

[8] Haimi-Cohen Y, Vellozi EM, Rubin LG. Initial concentration of Staphylococcus epidermidis in simulated pediatric blood cultures correlates with time to positive results with the automated, continuously monitored BACTEC blood culture system[J]. J Clin Microbiol,2002,40(3):898-901.

[9] Khatib R,Riederer K,Saeed S,et al . Time to positivity in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: possible correlation with the source and outcome of infection[J]. Clin Infect Dis,2005,41(5):594-598.

[10] Kim J,Gregson DB,Ross T,et al . Time to blood culture positivity in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: association with 30-day mortality[J]. J Infect,2010,61(3):197-204.

[11] Marra AR,Edmond MB,Forbes BA,et al . Time to blood culture positivity as a predictor of clinical outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection[J]. J Clin Microbiol,2006,44(4):1342-1346.

[12] Sanford JP. The Sanford guide to antimicrobial therapy[M].新译第41版.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2011:79-84.

[13] Zadroga R,Williams DN,Gottschall R,et al.Comparison of 2 blood culture media shows significant differences in bacterial recovery for patients on antimicrobial therapy [J]. Clin Infect Dis,2013,56(6):790-797.

[1]	邓劲, 刘雅, 吴思颖, 廖全凤, 张为利, 肖玉玲, 谢轶, 马莹, 康梅. 抗菌药物体外联合药物敏感性试验方法[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38(4): 385-393.
[2]	秦惠宏, 王春, 阮小玲, 刘昌颀, 张泓. 儿童血流感染浦那沙门菌1例报道[J]. 检验医学, 2022, 37(9): 901-903.
[3]	江雨航, 高源, 秦维超, 曾颜. 心脏人工瓣膜置换术后长奈瑟菌血流感染1例报道[J]. 检验医学, 2022, 37(8): 803-806.
[4]	陈晗璐, 吴盛海. 血培养阴性血流感染影响因素及实验室检测研究进展[J]. 检验医学, 2022, 37(7): 688-694.
[5]	褚敏君, 李小娟, 黄海林, 李珏, 麻明彪, 杜廷义, 王海平. 延迟放瓶对2种自动化血培养系统苛养菌培养的影响[J]. 检验医学, 2022, 37(3): 209-212.
[6]	康怡, 朱宏, 沈瀚, 周万青. 临床血液和尿液样本分离肠球菌毒力基因分析[J]. 检验医学, 2022, 37(11): 1030-1033.
[7]	杨溪, 宋文琪, 董方, 孟庆盈, 甄景慧, 周为. 革兰染色与MALDI-TOF MS在快速鉴定儿童阳性血培养病原菌种类中的应用[J]. 检验医学, 2022, 37(10): 969-973.
[8]	张亚茹, 凌丽燕, 陈敏. EUCAST和CLSI微量肉汤稀释法白念珠菌体外药物敏感性试验结果比较[J]. 检验医学, 2022, 37(10): 974-978.
[9]	李妍淳, 田彬, 岳娜, 胡志东. 2014—2020年天津某院真菌血症病原菌分布及耐药性分析[J]. 检验医学, 2021, 36(8): 800-804.
[10]	辛冉, 高翔, 安海英, 辛广勤, 戴伟利, 宫晶书. 某三级中医医院细菌耐药与抗菌药物使用情况相关性分析[J]. 检验医学, 2021, 36(8): 809-813.
[11]	李亚周, 马炜, 刘云, 万玉香, 黄晓春, 秦琴. 多指标联合检测在血流感染早期诊断中的价值[J]. 检验医学, 2021, 36(8): 847-850.
[12]	余佳佳, 李媛睿, 刘瑛. SDS和SAP前处理联合MALDI-TOF MS在报阳血培养样本快速病原菌鉴定中的价值[J]. 检验医学, 2021, 36(8): 864-868.
[13]	王亚洲, 刘慧玲. 血流感染患者血小板参数的变化[J]. 检验医学, 2021, 36(5): 514-516.
[14]	王东江, 郭建. 免疫功能正常者新生隐球菌感染1例报道[J]. 检验医学, 2021, 36(5): 577-580.
[15]	侯伟伟, 江涟, 李冬. MALDI-TOF MS直接鉴定血培养阳性病原的临床应用[J]. 检验医学, 2021, 36(4): 424-429.

BD BACTEC 9240全自动血液培养系统在检测血流感染病原菌的影响因素评价

Evaluation on the influence factor on pathogen detection of bloodstream infection by BD BACTEC 9240 automated blood culture system

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics