检验医学 ›› 2024, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 650-655.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2024.07.006

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

Ang-1、HO-1、NGF和MMSE评分在HICH疗效评价中的价值

张春香1, 冀明明2, 孙敏玲3, 李建英1   

  1. 1.张家口市第一医院内科重症医学科,河北 张家口 075000
    2.张家口市第一医院急诊重症医学科,河北 张家口 075000
    3.张家口市第一医院康复科,河北 张家口 075000
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-03 修回日期:2024-03-22 出版日期:2024-07-30 发布日期:2024-07-31
  • 作者简介:张春香,女,1984年生,学士,主治医师,主要从事神经系统重症疾病研究。
  • 基金资助:
    张家口市重点研发计划项目(2121160D)

Roles of Ang-1,HO-1,NGF and MMSE scores in evaluation of HICH efficacy

ZHANG Chunxiang1, JI Mingming2, SUN Minling3, LI Jianying1   

  1. 1. Intensive Care Unit of Internal Medicine,Zhangjiakou First Hospital,Zhangjiakou 075000,Hebei,China
    2. Emergency Intensive Care Unit,Zhangjiakou First Hospital,Zhangjiakou 075000,Hebei,China
    3. Department of Rehabilitation,Zhangjiakou First Hospital,Zhangjiakou 075000,Hebei,China
  • Received:2023-02-03 Revised:2024-03-22 Online:2024-07-30 Published:2024-07-31

摘要:

目的 探讨血管生成素-1(Ang-1)、血红素氧化酶1(HO-1)、神经生长因子(NGF)和简易智能精神状态检查量表(MMSE)评分在高血压脑出血(HICH)疗效评估中的价值。方法 选取2018年2月—2022年2月张家口市第一医院HICH患者152例(HICH组)和健康体检者68名(正常对照组)。所有患者均接受去骨瓣血肿清除术、支持治疗和脑蛋白水解物治疗,根据疗效分为有效组(105例)和无效组(47例)。分别检测HICH患者治疗前、治疗后和正常对照者的血清Ang-1、HO-1、NGF水平,采用MMSE评分评估HICH患者的认知功能。采用多因素Logistic回归分析评估HICH无效的危险因素。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价Ang-1、HO-1、NGF、MMSE评分判断HICH疗效的效能。结果 HICH组治疗前血清Ang-1、NGF水平和MMSE评分低于正常对照组(P<0.05),血清HO-1水平高于正常对照组(P<0.05)。有效组治疗后血清Ang-1、NGF水平和MMSE评分显著高于治疗前(P<0.05),血清HO-1水平低于治疗前(P<0.05);无效组治疗前、治疗后各项指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。无效组治疗前、治疗后血清Ang-1、NGF水平和MMSE评分均显著低于有效组(P<0.05),血清HO-1水平均显著高于有效组(P<0.05)。高血压3级和治疗前HO-1升高、Ang-1降低、NGF降低、MMSE评分降低是HICH患者治疗无效的危险因素[比值比(OR)值分别为2.324、1.442、0.549、0.671、0.716,95%可信区间(CI)分别为1.357~5.468、1.203~4.535、0.211~0.884、0.316~0.854、0.461~0.973,P<0.05]。血清Ang-1、HO-1、NGF水平和MMSE评分单项和联合检测判断HICH疗效的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.859、0.848、0.856、0.820、0.958。结论 血清Ang-1、NGF、HO-1水平与HICH患者的临床疗效有关,或可作为HICH疗效评估的潜在指标。

关键词: 血管生成素-1, 血红素氧化酶1, 神经生长因子, 高血压脑出血, 认知障碍

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of angiopoietin-1(Ang-1),heme oxygenase 1(HO-1),nerve growth factor (NGF) and Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE)score in hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH). Methods Totally,152 patients with HICH(HICH group)and 68 healthy subjects (healthy control group) were enrolled from Zhangjiakou First Hospital from February 2018 to February 2022. All the patients were treated with bone flap hematoma removal,supportive therapy and brain proteolytic hydrolysate. According to the efficacy,they were classified into effective group (105 cases) and ineffective group (47 cases). Serum Ang-1,HO-1 and NGF levels of HICH and healthy groups before and after treatment were determined,and MMSE scores were used to evaluate the cognitive function of HICH patients. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors of HICH treatment failure. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the efficacy of Ang-1,HO-1,NGF and MMSE scores in judging the therapeutic effect of HICH. Results Before treatment,serum Ang-1,NGF and MMSE scores in HICH group were lower than those in healthy control group (P<0.05),and serum HO-1 levels in HICH group were higher than those in healthy control group (P<0.05). After treatment,serum Ang-1,NGF and MMSE scores in effective group were higher than those before treatment (P<0.05),and serum HO-1 levels were lower(P<0.05). There was no statistical significance between the 2 groups before and after treatment (P>0.05). Serum Ang-1,NGF levels and MMSE scores in ineffective group were lower than those in effective group before and after treatment (P<0.05),and serum HO-1 levels were higher than those in effective group (P<0.05). Grade 3 hypertension and pre-treatment increase of HO-1,decrease of Ang-1,decrease of NGF and decrease of MMSE scores were risk factors for treatment ineffectiveness in patients with HICH [odds ratios (OR) were 2.324,1.442,0.549,0.671 and 0.716,95% confidence intervals (CI) were 1.357-5.468,1.203-4.535,0.211-0.884,0.316-0.854 and 0.461-0.973,respectively,P<0.05]. The areas under curves (AUC) of serum Ang-1,HO-1,NGF levels and MMSE scores and combined determination to judge the treatment efficacy of HICH were 0.859,0.848,0.856,0.820 and 0.958. Conclusions Serum Ang-1,NGF and HO-1 levels are related to the clinical efficacy of patients with HICH,and they may be used as potential indicators for the efficacy evaluation of HICH.

Key words: Angiopoietin-1, Heme oxidase 1, Nerve growth factor, Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, Cognitive impairment

中图分类号: