检验医学 ›› 2016, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 31-37.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2016.01.007

• 临床应用研究·论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国18项干化学检测项目参考区间调查及与已发布和即将发布的卫生行业标准的比较和分析

钟堃, 王薇, 何法霖, 王治国   

  1. 北京医院卫生部临床检验中心,北京 100730
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-13 出版日期:2016-01-31 发布日期:2016-02-16
  • 作者简介:null

    作者简介:钟堃,男,1984年生,硕士,助理研究员,主要从事临床实验室质量管理工作。

    通讯作者:王治国,联系电话:010-58115055。

  • 基金资助:
    北京市自然科学基金资助项目(7143182)

Comparison and analysis on the reference intervals of Chinese 18 dry chemistry items with current health industry standards and draft for approval

ZHONG Kun, WANG Wei, HE Falin, WANG Zhiguo   

  1. National Center for Clinical Laboratories,Beijing Hospital,Beijing 100730,China
  • Received:2014-12-13 Online:2016-01-31 Published:2016-02-16

摘要: 目的对我国医院检验科干化学检验项目的参考区间进行调查和分析,并与现行和即将发布的卫生行业标准进行比较,全面了解我国医院检验科干化学检验项目的参考区间应用情况。方法采用基于Web方式的室间质量评价(EQA)软件系统收集参加2014年全国干化学和常规化学参考区间调查的实验室上报数据,利用单样本t检验等统计方法对数据进行分析。结果有83.3%(30/36)的项目参考区间上、下限与卫生行业标准存在差异(P<0.05)。有83.3%(20/24)的项目男、女性参考区间上、下限与卫生行业标准存在差异(P<0.05)。有73.6%(53/72)的项目按检测系统分组得出的参考区间上、下限与卫生行业标准存在差异(P<0.05)。结论我国干化学检验项目目前应用的参考区间与卫生行业标准存在一定的差异,建议建立中国人群干化学检验项目的参考区间。

关键词: 干化学, 参考区间, 卫生行业标准

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the current application status of reference intervals for dry chemistry items in China,and compare with current health industry standards and draft for approval. Methods By Web-based external quality assessment(EQA) software system,the submitted data from the laboratories, which attended national reference interval investigation for dry chemistry and routine chemistry,2014,were collected. Statistical methods,such as single-sample t determination,were used to analyze the data. Results A total of 83.3%(30/36)of reference interval upper and lower limits had differences compared with those from health industry standards(P<0.05),and 83.3%(20/24)of male and female reference interval upper and lower limits had significantly statistical differences compared with those from health industry standards(P<0.05). The 73.6%(53/72)of measurement system reference interval upper and lower limits had significantly statistical differences compared with those from health industry standards(P<0.05).Conclusions The reference intervals for dry chemistry items in China have overwhelmingly big differences compared with health industry standards. It is proposed that the reference intervals for dry chemistry items in China should be established for Chinese population.

Key words: Dry chemistry, Reference interval, Health industry standard

中图分类号: