Laboratory Medicine ›› 2019, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 626-629.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2019.07.012

• 临床应用研究·论著 • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Role of urinary aquaporin 2 in evaluating proximal tubular injury

WANG Xueying1, LIU Huan1, ZHOU Xiang2, YANG Ruofan3, WANG Chun'e1, MA Lian1, BAI Bifeng1, LI Feng1()   

  1. 1. Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Internal Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital(Xijing Hospital) of Air Force Military Medical University,Xi'an 710032,Shaanxi,China
    2. Department of Nuclear Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital(Xijing Hospital) of Air Force Military Medical University,Xi'an 710032,Shaanxi,China
    3. Department of Clinical Laboratory,the First Affiliated Hospital(Xijing Hospital) of Air Force Military Medical University,Xi'an 710032,Shaanxi,China
  • Received:2018-04-19 Online:2019-07-30 Published:2019-07-25

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the role of urinary aquaporin 2(AQP2) in evaluating proximal tubular injury. Methods A total of 353 healthy subjects were enrolled as healthy control group,and 70 hypertensive nephrotic patients were enrolled and classified into edema group(38 cases) and non-edema group(32 cases). Their general data were collected,and urinary AQP2,urinary alpha1-microglobulin(α1-MG),beta2-microglobulin(β2-MG),serum creatinine(SCr),serum cystatin C(Cys C) levels were determined. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was used to evaluate the role of urinary AQP2 for the diagnosis of proximal tubular injury. Results Urinary AQP2 showed skewed distribution,and its level was 9.42(6.96-13.95) ng/mL. The reference interval was ≤19.11 ng/mL. The level of urinary AQP2 in nephrotic group was higher than that in healthy control group(P<0.01),and the levels of urinary AQP21-MG and β2-MG in edema group were higher than those in non-edema group(P<0.01). There was no statistical significance for body mass index(BMI),SCr,serum Cys C between the 2 groups(P>0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the areas under the curves(AUC) for the diagnosis of kidney disease and edema were 0.93 and 0.83,the optimal cut-off values were 18.12 and 26.93 ng/mL,the sensitivities were 81.43% and 71.05%,and the specificities were 92.63% and 81.25%,respectively. The AUC of α1-MG and β2-MG for the diagnosis of edema were 0.80 and 0.69,respectively. The AUC of urinary AQP2 combined with α1-MG and β2-MG for the detection of nephrotic edema is 0.91,the sensitivity is 86.84%,and the specificity is 87.50%. Conclusions Urinary AQP2 can be used as a sensitive indicator in evaluating proximal tubular injury.

Key words: Aquaporin 2, Urine, Proximal tubular injury, Kidney disease

CLC Number: