Evaluation of repeat-sampling quality control strategy based on 1:2s rule

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2020.05.022

Laboratory Medicine ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 497-500.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2020.05.022

Previous Articles Next Articles

Evaluation of repeat-sampling quality control strategy based on 1:2s rule

ZHANG Yu, PENG Aihong, YANG Lihua, YU Qihua()

The Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province,Hunan Center for Clinical Laboratory,Changsha 410007,Hunan,China

Received:2018-09-29 Online:2020-05-30 Published:2020-06-17

Abstract

CLC Number:

R446.1

ZHANG Yu, PENG Aihong, YANG Lihua, YU Qihua. Evaluation of repeat-sampling quality control strategy based on 1:2s rule[J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2020, 35(5): 497-500.

质控界限	△SE	P₁	N	方案一P_ed	方案二P_ed	方案三P_ed	方案四P_ed
2	n	NORMSDIST（-A2-B2）+ （1-NORMSDIST（A2-B2））	N	1-（（1-C2^2））^D2	1-（1-C2）^D2（1+D2C2）	（1-（1-C2）^D2）^2	1-（1-C2）^D2（1+D2C2*（1-C2）^（D2-1））
2	0.0	0.045 5	2	0.004 1	0.006 0	0.007 9	0.009 8
2	0.5	0.073 0	2	0.010 6	0.015 2	0.019 8	0.024 4
2	1.0	0.160 0	2	0.050 5	0.068 6	0.086 7	0.104 7
2	1.5	0.308 8	2	0.181 6	0.227 1	0.272 7	0.318 2
2	2.0	0.500 0	2	0.437 5	0.500 0	0.562 5	0.625 0
2	2.5	0.691 5	2	0.727 6	0.773 2	0.818 7	0.864 2
2	3.0	0.841 3	2	0.914 7	0.932 5	0.950 3	0.968 1
2	3.5	0.933 2	2	0.983 3	0.987 2	0.991 1	0.995 0
2	4.0	0.977 2	2	0.998 0	0.998 5	0.999 0	0.999 5
2	4.5	0.993 8	2	0.999 8	0.999 9	0.999 9	1.000 0
2	5.0	0.998 7	2	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0

质控界限	△SE	P₁	N	方案一P_ed	方案二P_ed	方案三P_ed	方案四P_ed
2	n	NORMSDIST（-A2-B2）+ （1-NORMSDIST（A2-B2））	N	1-（（1-C2^2））^D2	1-（1-C2）^D2（1+D2C2）	（1-（1-C2）^D2）^2	1-（1-C2）^D2（1+D2C2*（1-C2）^（D2-1））
2	0.0	0.045 5	2	0.004 1	0.006 0	0.007 9	0.009 8
2	0.5	0.073 0	2	0.010 6	0.015 2	0.019 8	0.024 4
2	1.0	0.160 0	2	0.050 5	0.068 6	0.086 7	0.104 7
2	1.5	0.308 8	2	0.181 6	0.227 1	0.272 7	0.318 2
2	2.0	0.500 0	2	0.437 5	0.500 0	0.562 5	0.625 0
2	2.5	0.691 5	2	0.727 6	0.773 2	0.818 7	0.864 2
2	3.0	0.841 3	2	0.914 7	0.932 5	0.950 3	0.968 1
2	3.5	0.933 2	2	0.983 3	0.987 2	0.991 1	0.995 0
2	4.0	0.977 2	2	0.998 0	0.998 5	0.999 0	0.999 5
2	4.5	0.993 8	2	0.999 8	0.999 9	0.999 9	1.000 0
2	5.0	0.998 7	2	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0

质控界限	△SE	P₁	N	方案一P_ed	方案二P_ed	方案三P_ed	方案四P_ed
2	n	NORMSDIST（-A2-B2）+ （1-NORMSDIST（A2-B2））	N	1-（（1-C2^2））^D2	1-（1-C2）^D2（1+D2C2）	（1-（1-C2）^D2）^2	1-（1-C2）^D2（1+D2C2*（1-C2）^（D2-1））
2	0.0	0.045 5	3	0.006 2	0.011 7	0.017 0	0.022 2
2	0.5	0.073 0	3	0.015 9	0.029 0	0.041 4	0.053 5
2	1.0	0.160 0	3	0.074 9	0.122 8	0.165 9	0.206 6
2	1.5	0.308 8	3	0.259 6	0.363 8	0.448 5	0.523 6
2	2.0	0.500 0	3	0.578 2	0.687 5	0.765 7	0.828 2
2	2.5	0.691 5	3	0.857 9	0.909 7	0.942 1	0.964 8
2	3.0	0.841 3	3	0.975 1	0.985 9	0.992 0	0.995 8
2	3.5	0.933 2	3	0.997 8	0.998 9	0.999 4	0.999 7
2	4.0	0.977 2	3	0.999 9	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0
2	4.5	0.993 8	3	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0
2	5.0	0.998 7	3	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0

质控界限	△SE	P₁	N	方案一P_ed	方案二P_ed	方案三P_ed	方案四P_ed
2	n	NORMSDIST（-A2-B2）+ （1-NORMSDIST（A2-B2））	N	1-（（1-C2^2））^D2	1-（1-C2）^D2（1+D2C2）	（1-（1-C2）^D2）^2	1-（1-C2）^D2（1+D2C2*（1-C2）^（D2-1））
2	0.0	0.045 5	3	0.006 2	0.011 7	0.017 0	0.022 2
2	0.5	0.073 0	3	0.015 9	0.029 0	0.041 4	0.053 5
2	1.0	0.160 0	3	0.074 9	0.122 8	0.165 9	0.206 6
2	1.5	0.308 8	3	0.259 6	0.363 8	0.448 5	0.523 6
2	2.0	0.500 0	3	0.578 2	0.687 5	0.765 7	0.828 2
2	2.5	0.691 5	3	0.857 9	0.909 7	0.942 1	0.964 8
2	3.0	0.841 3	3	0.975 1	0.985 9	0.992 0	0.995 8
2	3.5	0.933 2	3	0.997 8	0.998 9	0.999 4	0.999 7
2	4.0	0.977 2	3	0.999 9	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0
2	4.5	0.993 8	3	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0
2	5.0	0.998 7	3	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0	1.000 0

质控界限	△SE	P₁	N	方案一N_Q	方案二N_Q	方案三N_Q	方案四N_Q
2	n	NORMSDIST（-A2-B2）+ （1-NORMSDIST（A2-B2））	N	D2*（1+C2）	D2（1+（1-C2）^（D2-1）C2）	D2*（2-（1-C2）^D2）	D2（1+D2（1-C2）^（D2-1）*C2）
2	0	0.045 5	2	2.09	2.09	2.18	2.17
2	0	0.045 5	3	3.14	3.12	3.39	3.37

Evaluation of repeat-sampling quality control strategy based on 1:2s rule

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 6

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

项目	△SE	西格玛值	允许不精密度/%
N=2
方案一	2.942 1	4.59	21.8
方案二	2.856 7	4.51	22.2
方案三	2.750 2	4.40	22.7
方案四	2.619 0	4.27	23.4
N=3
方案一	2.619 0	4.27	23.4
方案二	2.466 5	4.12	24.3
方案三	2.327 6	3.98	25.1
方案四	2.191 4	3.84	26.0

[1]	WESTGARD J O.医学实验室质量控制实践基础[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社,2015.
[2]	PARVIN C A,KUCHIPUDI L,YUNDT-PACHECO J C. Should I repeat my 1:2s QC rejection?[J]. Clin Chem,2012,58(5):925-929.
[3]	肖亚玲,王薇,王治国. ISO 15189:2012与室内质量控制[J]. 临床检验杂志,2014,32(2):124-125.
[4]	王治国. 临床检验质量控制技术[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2014.
[5]	WESTGARD J O.A total quality-control plan with right-sized statistical quality-control[J]. Clin Lab Med,2017,37(1):137-150.
[6]	费阳,王薇,王治国. 临床检验室内质量控制规则设计新工具-Westgard西格玛规则[J]. 现代检验医学杂志,2015,30(1):149-152.

[1]	ZHANG Hongwei, ZHAO Zhengjie, ZHAO Yan, LI Haisheng, LI Xiufang, QIAN Jing, GUO Chong. Application of Unity Real Time software to establish individual quality control rules for blood cell analysis [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2021, 36(7): 749-752.
[2]	ZHENG Cuiling, WANG Li, CHENG Yan, CUI Wei. Fresh blood comparison program in daily internal quality control of hematology analyzers [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2021, 36(6): 662-666.
[3]	GE Danhong, TANG Liping, OU Yuanzhu, YU Xiaoxuan, LIU Wenbin, LIN Feiran, GONG Jingkai, ZHU Yuqing. Assessment of internal quality control plan for microfluidic chip POCT [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2021, 36(6): 674-678.
[4]	ZHAO Ran, LIU Wenbin, LIN Feiran, GONG Jingkai, YU Xiaoxuan, GE Danhong, TANG Liping, OU Yuanzhu. Internal quality control and evaluation of blood gas analysis based on Westgard sigma rules [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2021, 36(5): 544-548.
[5]	WEN Liangxue, ZHANG Lanyi, SU Li, WANG Mingfen, LIU Yongsheng. Internal quality control of HBV DNA determination in blood center nucleic acid laboratory [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2021, 36(4): 437-440.
[6]	WANG Xinqin, QIU Wei, CHEN Sumei, LIU Dongsheng. Establishment of routine dry biochemical test IQC rules based on six sigma quality management method [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2020, 35(1): 66-69.
[7]	HOU Weiwei, JIANG Lian, WAN Haiying. Design of intelligent clinical microbiological testing quality control management system [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2019, 34(11): 973-977.
[8]	WANG Huiru, LI Guixia, HUANG Jing, WU Hao, DI Yang. Six sigma for evaluating the performance of blood cell analysis internal quality control inter-laboratory comparison among 17 laboratories from Grade 3 Class A hospitals in Hebei [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2018, 33(6): 563-566.
[9]	ZHAO Haijian, ZHANG Chuanbao, WANG Jing, DU Zhongli, WANG Zhiguo. Quality control rule softwares for datum analysis in external quality assessment of quantitative assays [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2016, 31(4): 319-323.
[10]	FEI Yang, WANG Wei, WANG Zhiguo. Application of Westgard sigma rules in selecting internal quality control rules for clinical hematology tests [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2016, 31(11): 993-996.
[11]	GE Yajuan, XU Qunhuan, ZHANG Qing. Assessment on the validity of biochemical determination results after internal quality control out-of-control [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2015, 30(8): 844-846.
[12]	WANG Xiaoyan, SUN Hui, SUN Gang, CAI Shumin. Analysis on out-of-control items during the internal quality control on clinical biochemical determination in Department of Clinical Laboratory, Inner Mongolia Forestry General Hospital [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2015, 30(5): 517-519.
[13]	LI Guohua, WANG Wei, HE Falin, ZHONG Kun, ZHANG Yan, ZHAO Yan, WANG Zhiguo.. Investigation and analysis on the coefficients of variation of internal quality control for dry chemistry tests in China [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2015, 30(4): 381-385.
[14]	JIANG Lingli, WANG Xueliang, XIAO Yanqun, WANG Hualiang. The investigation on the internal quality control of HBV DNA determination by fluorescence quantitation PCR [J]. , 2014, 29(6): 668-670.
[15]	CHEN Longmei, WANG Huimin, JU Yi.. The introduction of evaluating measurement uncertainty with top-down approach [J]. , 2014, 29(1): 81-85.