[1] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Principles and procedures for blood cultures; approved guideline[S]. M47-A, CLSI, 2007.[2] 中华医学会重症医学分会. 血管内导管相关感染的预防与治疗指南(2007)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2008, 28(6):413-421.[3] Schmitt SK, Knapp C, Hall GS, et al. Impact of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters on in vitro quantitation of catheter-associated bacteria[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 1996, 34(3):508-511.[4] Acua M, O′Ryan M, Cofré J,et al. Differential time to positivity and quantitative cultures for noninvasive diagnosis of catheter-related blood stream infection in children[J]. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2008, 27(8):681-685.[5] Bouza E, Alvarado N, Alcalá L, et al. A randomized and prospective study of 3 procedures for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection without catheter withdrawal[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2007, 44(6):820-826.[6] Germanakis I, Christidou A, Galanakis E, et al. Qualitative versus quantitative blood cultures in the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections in children with malignancy[J]. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2005, 45(7):939-944.[7] Catton JA, Dobbins BM, Kite P, et al. In situ diagnosis of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection: a comparison of quantitative culture, differential time to positivity, and endoluminal brushing[J]. Crit Care Med, 2005, 33(4):787-791.[8] 〖JP+4〗Chatzinikolaou I, Hanna H, Hachem R, et al. Differential quantitative blood cultures for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections associated with short- and long-term catheters: a prospective study[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2004, 50(3):167-172.[9] Seifert H, Cornely O, Seggewiss K, et al. Bloodstream infection in neutropenic cancer patients related to short-term nontunnelled catheters determined by quantitative blood cultures, differential time to positivity, and molecular epidemiological typing with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2003, 41(1):118-123.[10] Blot F, Nitenberg G, Brun-Buisson C. New tools in diagnosing catheter-related infections[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2000, 8(4):287-292.[11] Blot F, Nitenberg G, Chachaty E, et al. Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia: a prospective com-parison of the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood cultures[J]. Lancet, 1999, 354(9184):1071-1077.[12] Moonens F, el Alami S, Van Gossum A, et al. Usefulness of gram staining of blood collected from total parenteral nutrition catheter for rapid diagnosis of catheter-related sepsis[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 1994, 32(6):1578-1579.[13] Capdevila JA, Planes AM, Palomar M, et al. Value of differential quantitative blood cultures in the diagnosis of catheter-related sepsis[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 1992, 11(5):403-407.[14] Al Wohoush I, Cairo J, Rangaraj G, et al. Comparing quantitative culture of a blood sample obtained through the catheter with differential time to positivity in establishing a diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2010, 31(10):1089-1091. |