检验医学 ›› 2012, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (7): 584-587.

• 免疫学检验论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

补体荧光法检测抗核周因子方法的建立及临床初步应用

李玉芹1,李立和2   

  1. 1. 天津医学高等专科学校,天津 300222;2. 天津市宝坻区人民医院检验科,天津 301800
  • 收稿日期:2012-06-25 修回日期:2012-06-26 出版日期:2012-07-30 发布日期:2012-07-05
  • 作者简介:李玉芹,女,1970年生,学士,主管技师,主要从事医学检验工作。

Establishment of the complement-mediated indirect immunofluorescence method for detecting anti-perinuclear factor and its primary clinical application

  1. 1.Tianjin Medical College,Tianjin 300222,China;2. Department of Clinical Laboratory ,Tianjin Baodi People′s Hospital,Tianjin 301800,China
  • Received:2012-06-25 Revised:2012-06-26 Online:2012-07-30 Published:2012-07-05

摘要: 目的 建立检测抗核周因子(APF)抗体的补体参与的间接免疫荧光两步法(简称补体免疫荧光两步法)并做临床初步应用。方法 以非吸烟、健康、无结缔组织病供者口腔颊部上皮细胞为底物,加入被检者稀释血清,再加入补体,继加入抗补体C3C荧光素,核固红甘油缓冲液封片,在荧光显微镜下观察,在细胞核的周围,即细胞质中出现大小不等、圆形或椭圆形均质荧光颗粒为阳性,阳性细胞占总细胞50%为APF阳性,做血清补体灭活前后APF检测结果比较。分别检测76例类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者(活动期、缓解期)和61例非RA对照者APF,并与荧光标记检测抗人IgG型APF一步法(简称免疫荧光一步法)比较。结果 血清补体灭活前后APF检测阳性率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2种荧光方法检测APF阳性率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),补体免疫荧光两步法的荧光强度高于免疫荧光一步法,其敏感性为75.0%,特异性为96.7%,阳性预测值为96.6%,均高于一步法;同一RA患者活动期APF荧光强度高于缓解期。结论 补体免疫荧光两步法检测APF提高了分辨率,具有较高的敏感性和特异性,能同时检测IgM、IgA、IgG型抗体,可与类风湿因子(RF)、抗角蛋白抗体(AKA)诊断RA相互补充,提高RA的诊断率。

关键词: 抗补体C3C, 荧光标记物, 抗核周因子, 类风湿性关节炎

Abstract: Objective To establish a complement-meditated indirect immunofluorescence method(two-step method) for detecting anti-perinuclear factor(APF) and apply it primarily. Methods The epithelial cells of oral cheek from non-smoking healthy and non-connective tissue disease subjects were used as substrate. The diluted serum,complement and fluorescent label anticomplement C3C were added. The nuclear fast red-glycerol was performed. By microscopy,the sizes with round or oval homogeneous fluorescent granules in cytoplasm or around the nucleus were as positive. The positive cells accounted for 50% of total cells were regarded as APF-positive,and the results were compared before and after inactivating serum complement. The APF of 76 rheumatoid arthritis(RA) patients at activity and remission periods and 61 controls without RA were determined,and the results were analyzed comparatively with the fluorescent label method(one-step method) for anti-human IgG APF. Results The positive rates of both methods had no significant differences before and after inactivating serum complement(P>0.05). The positive rates of the 2 methods were significantly different(P<0.05). Two-step method surpassed the one-step method in sensitivity(75.0%),specificity(96.7%) and positive predictive value(96.6%) which were higher than those of the one-step method. The APF fluorescence intensity in activity period was higher than that in remission period in the identical patients with RA. Conclusions Two-step method can detect APF antibody of IgM,IgA and IgG types simultaneously,and surpasses the one-step method in resolution,sensitivity and specificity. With rheumatoid factor(RF) and anti-keratin antibodies(AKA),they can complement each other in diagnosis of RA and improve the diagnosis of RA.

Key words: Anticomplement C3C, Fluorescent label, Anti-perinuclear factor, Rheumatoid arthritis