检验医学 ›› 2012, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (12): 1062-1065.

• 生物化学检验论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

免疫抑制法测定线粒体型天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶的影响因素分析

  

  1. 苏州大学附属常州肿瘤医院检验科,江苏 常州 213001
  • 出版日期:2012-12-30 发布日期:2012-12-04
  • 作者简介:王地英,女,1971年生,学士,主管技师,主要从事临床检验工作。

Analysis on the influencefactors of determining mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase by immune suppression method

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory,Changzhou Tumor Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University,Jiangsu Changzhou 213001,China
  • Online:2012-12-30 Published:2012-12-04

摘要: 目的 探讨免疫抑制法测定血清线粒体型天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(m-AST)的影响因素。 方法 应用免疫抑制法和酶水解法分别测定60例肝炎患者和48名肝功能基本正常者(AST≤50 U/L,对照组)的m-AST和天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST),计算m-AST/AST比值;通过外加胞浆型天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(c-AST)抗体试验,分析免疫抑制法试剂中存在的抗c-AST抗体不足问题。 结果 对照组免疫抑制法m-AST测定结果明显高于酶水解法(P<0.01);肝炎组则明显低于酶水解法(P<0.01)。由免疫抑制法得出的m-AST/AST比值在对照组和肝炎组之间差异无统计学意义(P=0.094);由酶水解法得出的m-AST/AST比值肝炎组明显高于对照组(P<0.01)。肝炎组免疫抑制法m-AST和AST的相关性(r=0.969)高于对照组(r=0.878);而酶水解法二者的相关性(r=0.856)则低于对照组(r=0.902)。在免疫抑制法外加抗c-AST抗体试验中,m-AST测定值随抗c-AST抗体加入量的增加而下降。 结论 免疫抑制法试剂中抗体不足导致c-AST抑制不完全,m-AST项目特异性下降。使用m-AST/AST比值可以分析肝病的严重程度。规范免疫抑制法m-AST试剂中的抗体浓度、抗体稳定剂等因素有利于质量控制工作,提高m-AST的临床应用价值。

关键词: 天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶, 线粒体同工酶, 免疫抑制法, 酶水解法, 抗体

Abstract: Objective To investigate the influence factors of determining serum mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase(m-AST) by immune suppression method.   Methods The determinations of m-AST and aspartate aminotransferase(AST) in a control group(48 cases with AST≤50 U/L) and a hepatitis group(60 patients with hepatitis) were performed by immune suppression method and enzyme hydrolysis method respectively,and then the m-AST/AST ratios were calculated. The deficiency of cytosolic aspartate aminotransferase(c-AST) antibody in the immune suppression method reagents was confirmed through the complementary c-AST antibody test. Results In the control group,the m-AST value by immune suppression method was significantly higher than that by enzyme hydrolysis method(P<0.01),while in the hepatitis group,the m-AST value by immune suppression method was significantly lower than that by enzyme hydrolysis method(P<0.01). By the immune suppression method,the m-AST/AST ratio had no significant difference between the control group and the hepatitis group(P=0.094). By the enzyme hydrolysis method,the m-AST/AST ratio in the hepatitis group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.01). The correlation of m-AST and AST in the hepatitis group(r=0.969) was higher than that in the control group by immune suppression method(r=0.878),while by the enzyme hydrolysis method,the correlation in the hepatitis group(r=0.856) was lower than thatin the control group(r=0.902). In the complementary c-AST antibody test of immune suppression method,the values of m-AST decreased with the increase of c-AST antibody being added. Conclusions If the c-AST antibody is not enough in the immune suppression method reagents,c-AST could notbe inhibited completely,which would cause the decline of the specificity of m-AST test. Using the m-AST/AST ratio,the severity of the liver disease can be analyzed. The antibody concentration of m-AST reagent,the antibody stabilizers and so on should be standardized in order to contribute to the quality control work and improve the clinical application significance of m-AST.

Key words: Aspartate aminotransferase, Mitochondrial isoenzyme, Immune suppression method, Enzyme hydrolysis method, Antibody