检验医学 ›› 2012, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (12): 1002-1006.

• 质量控制与规范专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

常规化学项目总误差和不确定度比较研究

刘文彬   

  1. 上海市临床检验中心,上海 200126
  • 收稿日期:2012-10-29 修回日期:2012-11-02 出版日期:2012-12-30 发布日期:2012-12-04
  • 通讯作者: 居漪,联系电话:021-68316300。
  • 作者简介:刘文彬,男,1983年生,学士,技师,主要从事临床化学检验工作。

Comparison research between total error and uncertainty in routine clinical chemistry items

  1. Shanghai Centerfor Clinical Laboratory,Shanghai 200126,China
  • Received:2012-10-29 Revised:2012-11-02 Online:2012-12-30 Published:2012-12-04

摘要: 目的 分别利用总误差(TE)和不确定度的统计方法评价常规化学项目的性能。 方法 使用上海市临床检验中心室内质量控制软件统计2012年1至9月本实验室常规化学项目室内质量控制累积均值(〖AKx-D〗)、累积标准差(s)、累积变异系数(CV),利用美国病理学家协会(CAP)全球室间质评回报数据[共2次(C3-A、C3-B)]计算常规化学项目检测结果与靶值的相对偏倚(bias%)和相对平均偏倚bias%,结合室内质量控制累积CV计算TE。使用CAP室间常规化学回报数据和室内质量控制累积CV,采用Nordtest方法计算每个项目的不确定度。 结果 3个质量控制水平的葡萄糖(Glu)、肌酐(Cr)、尿素氮(BUN)、总蛋白(TP)、白蛋白(Alb)、尿酸(UA)、总胆红素(TBil)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、胆固醇(Chol)、甘油三酯(TG)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)的最大TE分别为5.40%、6.01%、9.37%、3.00%、6.52%、3.77%、26.79%、5.34%、4.03%、9.42%、9.25%、8.37%、6.19%、9.54%;这些项目的扩展不确定度分别为6.37%、6.50%、10.64%、3.23%、13.01%、4.84%、31.07%、6.00%、4.37%、13.27%、14.12%、10.07%、6.95%、14.08%。除Alb的不确定度超过美国临床实验室改进法案修正案(CLIA′88)和生物学变异所允许的范围外,其他项目均处于范围之内。 结论 TE和不确定度之间具有较好的一致性,可作为实验室检测质量分析和改进的重要依据。

关键词: 总误差, 不确定度, 生物学变异

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the performance of routine clinical chemistry items by the statistical method of total error(TE) and uncertainty.   Methods The data of internal quality control were collected by Shanghai Centerfor Clinical Laboratory Internal Quality Control software,from January to September 2012,and the accumulation means(),accumulation standard deviations(s) and accumulation coefficients of variation(CV) were calculated. The relative bias(bias%) and relative average bias(bias%) of routine clinical chemistry item results and targetvalues were calculated according to the 2 reports of College of American Pathologists(CAP) external quality assessmentplans(C3-A and C3-B). TE was calculated by the data of accumulation CV. By Nordtestmethod,the uncertainties of routine clinical chemistry items were calculated according to the external quality assessmentdata of CAP and internal quality control accumulation CVResults The routine clinical chemistry items included glucose(Glu),creatinine(Cr),urea nitrogen(BUN),total protein(TP),albumin(Alb),uric acid(UA),total bilirubin(TBil),alanine aminotransferase(ALT),cholesterol(Chol),triglyceride(TG),aspartate aminotransferase(AST),alkaline phosphatase(ALP),lactic dehydrogenase(LDH) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C),and their maximum TEs with every 3 internal quality control levels were 5.40%,6.01%,9.37%,3.00%,6.52%,3.77%,26.79%,5.34%,4.03%,9.42%,9.25%,8.37%,6.19% and 9.54%. The uncertainties were 6.37%,6.50%,10.64%,3.23%,13.01%,4.84%,31.07%,6.00%,4.37%,13.27%,14.12%,10.07%,6.95% and 14.08%. The results of all items,exceptAlb,were within Clinical Laboratory ImprmeyentAmendment(CLIA′88) ranges and biological variation allowable ranges. Conclusions Both TE and uncertainty have good consistency,and they can be the importantreferencefor the analysis and improvementof laboratory examination quality.

Key words: Total error, Uncertainty, Biological variation