检验医学 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 784-790.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2020.08.010

• 临床应用研究·论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环肿瘤DNA对黑色素瘤诊断价值的Meta分析

万文婷1, 于波1, 弓孟春1, 史文钊1, 郭昊1(), 杨杰2()   

  1. 1.神州数码医疗科技股份有限公司科学事务部,北京 100080
    2.南华大学附属湘潭医院泌尿外科,湖南 湘潭 411101
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-29 出版日期:2020-08-30 发布日期:2020-09-24
  • 作者简介:null

    作者简介:万文婷,女,1990年生,博士,主要从事网络药理学研究。

Value of circulating tumor DNA for the diagnosis of melanoma:a Meta-analysis

WAN Wenting1, YU Bo1, GONG Mengchun1, SHI Wenzhao1, GUO Hao1(), YANG Jie2()   

  1. 1. Department of Scientific Services,Digital China Health Technologies Co. Ltd.,Beijing 100080,China
    2. Department of Urology,Xiangtan Hospital,Nanhua University,Xiangtan 411101,Hunan,China
  • Received:2019-04-29 Online:2020-08-30 Published:2020-09-24

摘要:

目的 通过Meta分析系统评估循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)对黑色素瘤中基因突变的诊断价值。方法 系统检索Medline、Excerpta Medica Database(Embase)、Cochrane Library、中国知网及维普数据库,筛选出2019年1月之前发表的符合纳入标准的文献。以I2Q检验为指标分析异质性,采用相应的模型分析合并敏感性、合并特异性、合并阳性似然比(PLR)、合并阴性似然比(NLR)、合并诊断优势比(DOR)和综合受试者工作特征曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)。采用Deeks' 漏斗图评估发表偏移。结果 共纳入10项研究,涉及1 360例研究对象。合并敏感性、合并特异性、合并PLR和合并NLR分别为0.71[95%可信区间(CI)为0.63~0.79]、0.94(95%CI为0.91~0.96)、11.3(95%CI为7.2~17.5)和0.31(95%CI为0.23~0.41)。AUC和DOR分别为0.94(95%CI为0.92~0.96)和37(95%CI为19~71)。Deeks'漏斗图表明存在发表偏移。结论 在黑色素瘤患者中,ctDNA具有诊断价值,有望成为黑色素瘤基因突变诊断的辅助手段。

关键词: 循环肿瘤DNA, 黑色素瘤, 诊断价值, Meta分析

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of circulating tumor DNA(ctDNA) for melanoma by a Meta-analysis. Methods Medline,Excerpta Medica Database(Embase),Cochrane Library database,CNKI database and VIP database were searched systematically to identify studies reporting the diagnostic value of ctDNA for melanoma,until January 2019. The heterogeneity was analyzed by I2 and Q tests. The pooled sensitivity,specificity,positive likelihood ratio(PLR),negative likelihood ratio(NLR),diagnostic odds ratio(DOR) and the area under receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve(AUC) were analyzed. Deek's funnel plots were used to evaluate publication bias. Results A total of 10 eligible studies involving 1 360 patients were included in this Meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity,specificity,PLR and NLR were 0.71 [95% confidence interval(CI) 0.63-0.79],0.94(95%CI 0.91-0.96),11.3(95%CI 7.2-17.5) and 0.31(95%CI 0.23-0.41),respectively. The AUC and DOR were 0.94(95%CI 0.92-0.96)and 37(95%CI 19-71). Deek's funnel plots showed a publication bias. Conclusions ctDNA is potential for the auxiliary diagnosis of melanoma.

Key words: Circulating tumor DNA, Melanoma, Diagnostic value, Meta-analysis

中图分类号: