Laboratory Medicine ›› 2015, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 674-679.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2015.07.003

• Orginal Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The methods for measuring glomerular filtration rate and their clinical application

YU Qian, WANG Beili, GUO Wei, PAN Baishen   

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory,Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Received:2015-01-21 Online:2015-07-30 Published:2015-08-28

Abstract:

As the best scaleplate for evaluation on kidney function, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) plays an important role in daily practice and has a great influence on the optimization of diagnosis and treatment. GFR can be estimated through different formulas based on routine text results or measured directly. Bias may arise in certain situations as well as special populations when using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR),while measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) is more reliable. Regarding the different properties of common filtration markers such as inulin,creatinine,iohexol, 99mtechnetium-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA),51chromium-ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid and iothalamate, we could measure mGFR by means of blood and urine clearance rates or kidney dynamic imaging, and the results shows different accuracies. Endogenous creatinine clearance rate is widely used in common practice for convenience,while plenty of studies have revealed its remarkable bias of overestimating GFR. Regarding the outstanding performances in accuracy, either urine iohexol or 99mTc-DTPA clearance rate is better for popularization. As the validation for eGFR, mGFR deserves further work on its application and evaluation.

Key words: Glomerular filtration rate, Endogenous creatinine clearance rate, Iohexol, Radionuclide, Kidney function

CLC Number: