检验医学 ›› 2022, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10): 963-968.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2022.010.011

• 技术研究与评价・论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

改良Carba Np试验和mCIM/eCIM快速鉴定产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科细菌表型的临床应用

包海林1, 花鸿燕1, 孙恒亮1, 刘华1, 吉顺年1, 秦陈浩2, 杜鸿2()   

  1. 1.海安市中医院检验科,江苏 海安 226600
    2.苏州大学附属第二医院微生物科,江苏 苏州 215004
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-16 修回日期:2021-10-16 出版日期:2022-10-30 发布日期:2022-11-14
  • 通讯作者: 杜鸿
  • 作者简介:杜 鸿,E-mail:hong_du@126.com
    包海林,男,1976年生,学士,副主任技师,主要从事临床微生物及免疫相关疾病研究。
  • 基金资助:
    南通市科学技术局科技计划(指导性)项目(jcz19017)

Rapid identification of carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae phenotypes by modified Carba Np test and mCIM/eCIM test

BAO Hailin1, HUA Hongyan1, SUN Hengliang1, LIU Hua1, JI Shunnian1, QIN Chenhao2, DU Hong2()   

  1. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory,Hai'an Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Hai'an 226600,Jiangsu,China
    2. Department of Microbiology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University,Suzhou 215004,Jiangsu,China
  • Received:2021-08-16 Revised:2021-10-16 Online:2022-10-30 Published:2022-11-14
  • Contact: DU Hong

摘要:

目的 评估改良Carba Np试验与碳青霉烯灭活试验(mCIM)/乙二胺四乙酸碳青霉烯灭活试验(eCIM)在检测肠杆菌科细菌碳青霉烯酶表型中的应用价值。方法 收集136株肠杆菌科细菌临床分离株,其中耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌(CRE)86株,碳青霉烯敏感株50株。分别采用改良Carba Np试验、mCIM/eCIM进行检测,并进行表型分析和分类,以聚合酶链反应(PCR)碳青霉烯酶基因鉴定结果为标准,评价2种改良方法检测结果的差异。结果 86株CER中,耐药基因阳性81株;50株敏感菌株均未检出耐药基因。改良Carba NP试验阳性82株,mCIM/eCIM阳性78株。以PCR结果为标准,改良Carba NP试验和mCIM/eCIM检测肠杆菌科细菌碳青霉烯酶的敏感性、特异性分别为96.3%、92.7%和92.6%、94.5%,Kappa值分别为0.935和0.917。改良Carba NP试验丝氨酸碳青霉烯酶检出率为97.7%,金属碳青霉烯酶检出率为100.0%。mCIM/eCIM检测金属碳青霉烯酶的敏感性为91.2%、特异性为90.4%。改良Carba NP试验与mCIM/eCIM碳青霉烯酶阳性检出率差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.65,P>0.05)。结论 改良Carba NP试验可快速、准确地鉴定CRE表型;mCIM/eCIM操作简便、干扰因素少。2种改良方法可以优势互补,有较大的临床应用价值。

关键词: 碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌科细菌, 改良Carba Np试验, 改良碳青霉烯灭活试验

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the application value of modified Carba Np test and modified carbapenem inactivation method(mCIM),ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-carbapenem inactivation method(eCIM) for detecting carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae phenotypes. Methods Totally,86 isolates of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae(CRE) and 50 sensitive isolates were collected. Phenotype analysis and classification were performed by modified Carba Np test and mCIM/eCIM,respectively. The carbapenemase genes were detected by polymerase chain reaction(PCR). The difference between the 2 methods was evaluated. Results Among the 86 isolates of CRE,81 isolates were drug-resistant gene positive,and all the 50 sensitive isolates were drug-resistant gene negative. The 82 isolates of CRE were positive by modified Carba Np test,and 78 isolates were positive by mCIM/eCIM test. Compared with PCR results,the sensitivity and specificity of modified Carba Np test were 96.3% and 92.7%,respectively,the Kappa value was 0.935. The sensitivity and specificity of mCIM/eCIM test were 92.6% and 94.5%,respectively,and the Kappa value was 0.917. The detection rates of serine carbapenemase and metallocarbapenemase were 97.7% and 100.0% with modified Carba Np test. The sensitivity and specificity of mCIM/eCIM test were 91.2% and 90.4%,respectively. There was no statistical significance between modified Carba Np test and mCIM/eCIM test(χ2=1.65,P>0.05). Conclusions The modified Carba Np test could rapidly identify the phenotypes of carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae,and the modified mCIM/eCIM test is convenient,easy to operate and has few interference factors. The 2 methods could complement each other with clinical application value.

Key words: Carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Modified Carba Np test, Modified carbapenem inactivation method

中图分类号: