检验医学 ›› 2013, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 293-295.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2013.04.010

• 技术研究与评价.论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

Sysmex UF-1000i尿有形成分分析仪及AVE764B尿沉渣分析仪与手工镜检结果比较

应骏1,郭维1,马继荣1,应春妹2   

  1. 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院检验科,上海 200127
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-09 修回日期:2012-05-08 出版日期:2013-04-30 发布日期:2013-04-05
  • 通讯作者: 应春妹,联系电话:021-68383297。
  • 作者简介:应骏,男,1974年生,学士,主管技师,主要从事临床检验工作。

Comparison on the results of Sysmex UF-1000i and AVE764B analyzers and manual microscopy

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory,Renji Hospital,Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127,China
  • Received:2013-01-09 Revised:2012-05-08 Online:2013-04-30 Published:2013-04-05

摘要: 目的 以传统的手工镜检作为标准方法,对Sysmex UF-1000i尿有形成分分析仪(简称UF-1000i)、AVE764B尿沉渣分析仪(简称AVE764B)的定量分析检测结果进行比对,分析2种不同检测原理的检测系统的优缺点。 方法 收集200例泌尿科、肾内科等患者新鲜尿液(1 h内)标本进行分析,对2个分析系统做评估。 结果 手工镜检与UF-1000i比较,红细胞:Y=1.173X-3.277,r=0.975,F=3 771.028,P=0.000;白细胞:Y=0.658X+35.842,r=0.973,F=4 759.543,P=0.000;上皮细胞:Y=0.604X+11.252,r=0.973,F=1 378.888,P=0.000。手工镜检与AVE764B比较,红细胞:Y=1.27X-41.857,r=0.973,F=3 585.945,P=0.000。白细胞:Y=0.741X-9.402,r=0.990,F=10 210.826,P=0.000。上皮细胞:Y=0.486X-9.852,r=0.959,F=2 271.304,P=0.000。 结论 2个分析系统结果基本与手工镜检相符,相关性均较好,尿沉渣分析仪对尿有形成分有较好的识别分析能力,但实际工作中对部分特殊标本仍需人工镜检识别确定。

关键词: 有形成分, 尿液, Sysmex UF-1000i尿有形成分分析仪, AVE764B尿沉渣分析仪, 镜检

Abstract: Objective To use the traditional manual microscopy as the standard method,to compare the results of quantitative analysis of Sysmex UF-1000i urine formed element analyzer (UF-1000i analyzer) and AVE764B urinary sediment analyzer (AVE764B analyzer) and to analyze the 2 detection systems′strengths and weaknesses.   Methods A total of 200 fresh (within 1 h) urine samples of patients from Department of Urinary Surgery and Department of Urology were analyzed,and the 2 systems were evaluated. Results Manual microscopy and UF-1000i analyzer comparison showed that red blood cell: Y=1.173X-3.277,r=0.975,F=3 771.028,P=0.000; white blood cell: Y=0.658X+35.842,r=0.973,F=4 759.543,P=0.000; epithelial cell: Y=0.604X+11.252,r=0.973,F=1 378.888,P=0.000. Manual microscopy and AVE764B analyzer comparison showed that red blood cell: Y=1.27X-41.857,r=0.973,F=3 585.945,P=0.000; white blood cell: Y=0.741X-9.402,r=0.990,F=10 210.826,P=0.000; epithelial cell: Y=0.486X-9.852,r=0.959,F=2 271.304,P=0.000. Conclusions The results of the 2 systems and manual microscopy had consistent correlation. Urinary sediment analyzer has good recognition analysis for urine formed elements,but for the actual work or some special specimens, manual microscopy identification is needed.

Key words: Formed element, Urine, Sysmex UF-1000i urine formed element analyzer, AVE764B urinary sediment analyzer, Microscopy