检验医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 590-596.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2026.06.011
蔡骁垚1, 程阳1, 金姝2, 冯一鸣1, 胡奕雯1, 张立1, 朱卿1, 张骥1, 闫佩毅1(
)
收稿日期:2025-08-04
修回日期:2026-02-03
出版日期:2026-06-30
发布日期:2026-07-01
通讯作者:
闫佩毅,E-mail:yanpeiyi.cvcv@aliyun.com。
作者简介:蔡骁垚,男,1990年生,硕士,主要从事临床微生物和免疫检验工作。
基金资助:
CAI Xiaoyao1, CHENG Yang1, JIN Shu2, FENG Yiming1, HU Yiwen1, ZHANG Li1, ZHU Qing1, ZHANG Ji1, YAN Peiyi1(
)
Received:2025-08-04
Revised:2026-02-03
Online:2026-06-30
Published:2026-07-01
摘要:
目的 了解上海市普陀区人民医院新型冠状病毒感染疫情前后临床分离高黏液表型肺炎克雷伯菌(hmKp)的分子特征、毒力基因和耐药性变迁,为临床抗hmKp提供参考。方法 收集2018年1月—2020年12月(疫情前)和2023年1月—2024年12月(疫情后)肺炎克雷伯菌临床分离株,通过拉丝实验筛选出hmKp。采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测hmKp荚膜血清型(K1、K2、K5、K20、K54和K57)和毒力基因(rmpA、rmpA2、iroN、magA、iucA、kfu和allS),对hmKp进行多位点序列分型(MLST),结合体外药物敏感性试验结果评估其耐药性。比较疫情前后荚膜血清型、毒力基因、耐药性变化差异。结果 共检出64株hmKp,疫情前后检出率分别为14.16%、11.68%,均主要分离自呼吸道样本。疫情前后荚膜血清型分布变化显著,优势荚膜血清型从K20转变为K2,K57血清型由25.0%降至0。ST型别多样性增加,K2型以ST86为主,出现ST25等新亚型;疫情后毒力基因重组明显:iroN基因在K1、K2、K20血清型中从0增至100%,rmpA2基因在K1型中检出率达100%,iucA基因在K1、K2型中检出率为0。耐药率总体呈下降趋势,对头孢他啶(由18.75%降至9.38%)和左氧氟沙星(由18.75%降至6.25%)的耐药率降幅较大,对碳青霉烯类保持低耐药率(亚胺培南耐药率为6.25%)。结论 疫情后,hmKp呈血清型替代(K2型崛起)和毒力基因重组(iroN基因普适化)特征。K2型虽非传统高毒力血清型,但携带rmpA+rmpA2+iroN复合毒力基因簇,需警惕其临床风险,建议结合多指标而非单一血清型评估菌株毒力。
中图分类号:
蔡骁垚, 程阳, 金姝, 冯一鸣, 胡奕雯, 张立, 朱卿, 张骥, 闫佩毅. 2018—2024年上海市某二级综合医院高黏液表型肺炎克雷伯菌临床分离株分子特征、毒力基因和耐药性变迁[J]. 检验医学, 2026, 41(6): 590-596.
CAI Xiaoyao, CHENG Yang, JIN Shu, FENG Yiming, HU Yiwen, ZHANG Li, ZHU Qing, ZHANG Ji, YAN Peiyi. Molecular characteristics,virulence genes and drug resistance changes of clinical isolates of hypermucoviscous Klebsiella pneumoniae of a Grade 2 general hospital in Shanghai from 2018 to 2024[J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2026, 41(6): 590-596.
| 基因名称 | 上游引物(5'~3') | 下游引物(5'~3') |
|---|---|---|
| rpoB | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAGGCGAAATGG-CWGAGAACCA | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCGAGTCTTCGAAGT-TGTAACC |
| gapA | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTATGAAATATGAC-TCCACTCACGG | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCCTTCAGAAGCGGC-TTTGATGGCTT |
| mdh | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTACCCAACTCGCT-TCAGGTTCAG | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCCCGTTTTTCCCCA-GCAGCAG |
| pgi | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAGAGAAAAACC-TGCCTGTACTGCTGGC | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCCGCGCCACGCTTT-ATAGCGGTTAAT |
| phoE | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAACCTACCGCAA-CACCGACTCTTCGG | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCTGATCAGAACTGG-TAGGTGAT |
| infB | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTACTCGCTGCTGG-ACTATATTCG | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCCGCTTTCAGCTCA-AGAACTTC |
| tonB | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTACTTTATACCTCG-GTACATCAGGTT | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCATTCGCCGGCTGR-GCRGAGAG |
表1 引物序列
| 基因名称 | 上游引物(5'~3') | 下游引物(5'~3') |
|---|---|---|
| rpoB | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAGGCGAAATGG-CWGAGAACCA | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCGAGTCTTCGAAGT-TGTAACC |
| gapA | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTATGAAATATGAC-TCCACTCACGG | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCCTTCAGAAGCGGC-TTTGATGGCTT |
| mdh | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTACCCAACTCGCT-TCAGGTTCAG | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCCCGTTTTTCCCCA-GCAGCAG |
| pgi | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAGAGAAAAACC-TGCCTGTACTGCTGGC | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCCGCGCCACGCTTT-ATAGCGGTTAAT |
| phoE | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAACCTACCGCAA-CACCGACTCTTCGG | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCTGATCAGAACTGG-TAGGTGAT |
| infB | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTACTCGCTGCTGG-ACTATATTCG | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCCGCTTTCAGCTCA-AGAACTTC |
| tonB | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTACTTTATACCTCG-GTACATCAGGTT | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCATTCGCCGGCTGR-GCRGAGAG |
| 项目 | 疫情前/[株(%)] | MLST等位基因谱型gapA-infB-mdh-pgi-phoE-ropB-tonB① | 疫情后/[株(%)] | MLST等位基因谱型gapA-infB-mdh-pgi-phoE-ropB-tonB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | 5(15.6) | 5(15.6) | ||
| ST11 | 1(20.0) | 3-3-1-1-1-1-4 | 0(0) | |
| ST23 | 3(60.0) | 2-1-1-1-9-4-12 | 4(80.0) | 2-1-1-1-9-4-12 |
| ST412 | 1(20.0) | 2-1-2-1-9-1-112 | 0(0) | |
| ST218 | 0(0) | 1(20.0) | 2-3-1-1-9-4-12 | |
| K2 | 5(15.6) | 11(34.4)* | ||
| ST86 | 3(60.0) | 9-4-2-1-1-1-27 | 2(18.2) | 9-1-2-1-1-4-27 |
| ST66 | 2(40.0) | 2-3-2-1-10-1-13 | 0(0) | |
| ST65 | 0(0) | 5(45.5) | 2-1-2-1-10-4-13 | |
| ST464 | 0(0) | 1(9.1) | 2-5-2-1-26-1-2 | |
| ST34 | 0(0) | 1(9.1) | 2-3-6-1-9-7-4 | |
| ST25 | 0(0) | 2(18.2) | 2-1-1-1-10-4-13 | |
| K5 | 3(9.4) | 7(21.9) | ||
| ST11 | 3(100.0) | 3-3-1-1-1-1-4 | 0(0) | |
| ST6713 | 0(0) | 1(14.3) | 2-1-2-1-451-1-112 | |
| ST2158 | 0(0) | 1(14.3) | 4-1-5-1-7-1-24 | |
| ST23 | 0(0) | 1(14.3) | 2-1-1-1-9-4-12 | |
| ST412 | 0(0) | 1(14.3) | 2-1-2-1-9-1-112 | |
| ST592 | 0(0) | 1(14.3) | 2-3-6-1-9-4-13 | |
| ST859 | 0(0) | 1(14.3) | 3-3-1-1-1-1-1 | |
| ST273 | 0(0) | 1(14.3) | 3-4-6-1-7-4-4 | |
| K20 | 11(34.4) | 9(28.1) | ||
| ST268 | 6(54.5) | 2-1-2-1-7-1-81 | 0(0) | |
| ST34 | 4(36.4) | 2-3-6-1-9-7-4 | 0(0) | |
| ST111 | 1(9.1) | 2-1-5-1-17-4-42 | 0(0) | |
| ST29 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 2-3-2-2-6-4-4 | |
| ST11 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 3-3-1-1-1-1-4 | |
| ST218 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 2-3-1-1-9-4-12 | |
| ST15 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 1-1-1-1-1-1-1 | |
| ST412 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 2-1-2-1-9-1-112 | |
| ST893 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 25-1-101-1-10-1-100 | |
| ST4382 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 2-1-1-14-1-1-12 | |
| ST469 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 2-1-2-1-10-1-4 | |
| ST23 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 2-1-1-1-9-4-12 | |
| K54 | 0(0) | 0(0) | ||
| K57 | 8(25.0) | 0(0)** | ||
| ST412 | 5(62.5) | 2-1-2-1-9-1-112 | 0(0) | |
| ST15 | 2(25.0) | 1-1-1-1-1-1-1 | 0(0) | |
| ST1824 | 11(2.5) | 2-1-1-1-12-1-34 | 0(0) |
表2 疫情前后hmKp荚膜血清型、MLST分型和等位基因谱分析
| 项目 | 疫情前/[株(%)] | MLST等位基因谱型gapA-infB-mdh-pgi-phoE-ropB-tonB① | 疫情后/[株(%)] | MLST等位基因谱型gapA-infB-mdh-pgi-phoE-ropB-tonB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | 5(15.6) | 5(15.6) | ||
| ST11 | 1(20.0) | 3-3-1-1-1-1-4 | 0(0) | |
| ST23 | 3(60.0) | 2-1-1-1-9-4-12 | 4(80.0) | 2-1-1-1-9-4-12 |
| ST412 | 1(20.0) | 2-1-2-1-9-1-112 | 0(0) | |
| ST218 | 0(0) | 1(20.0) | 2-3-1-1-9-4-12 | |
| K2 | 5(15.6) | 11(34.4)* | ||
| ST86 | 3(60.0) | 9-4-2-1-1-1-27 | 2(18.2) | 9-1-2-1-1-4-27 |
| ST66 | 2(40.0) | 2-3-2-1-10-1-13 | 0(0) | |
| ST65 | 0(0) | 5(45.5) | 2-1-2-1-10-4-13 | |
| ST464 | 0(0) | 1(9.1) | 2-5-2-1-26-1-2 | |
| ST34 | 0(0) | 1(9.1) | 2-3-6-1-9-7-4 | |
| ST25 | 0(0) | 2(18.2) | 2-1-1-1-10-4-13 | |
| K5 | 3(9.4) | 7(21.9) | ||
| ST11 | 3(100.0) | 3-3-1-1-1-1-4 | 0(0) | |
| ST6713 | 0(0) | 1(14.3) | 2-1-2-1-451-1-112 | |
| ST2158 | 0(0) | 1(14.3) | 4-1-5-1-7-1-24 | |
| ST23 | 0(0) | 1(14.3) | 2-1-1-1-9-4-12 | |
| ST412 | 0(0) | 1(14.3) | 2-1-2-1-9-1-112 | |
| ST592 | 0(0) | 1(14.3) | 2-3-6-1-9-4-13 | |
| ST859 | 0(0) | 1(14.3) | 3-3-1-1-1-1-1 | |
| ST273 | 0(0) | 1(14.3) | 3-4-6-1-7-4-4 | |
| K20 | 11(34.4) | 9(28.1) | ||
| ST268 | 6(54.5) | 2-1-2-1-7-1-81 | 0(0) | |
| ST34 | 4(36.4) | 2-3-6-1-9-7-4 | 0(0) | |
| ST111 | 1(9.1) | 2-1-5-1-17-4-42 | 0(0) | |
| ST29 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 2-3-2-2-6-4-4 | |
| ST11 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 3-3-1-1-1-1-4 | |
| ST218 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 2-3-1-1-9-4-12 | |
| ST15 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 1-1-1-1-1-1-1 | |
| ST412 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 2-1-2-1-9-1-112 | |
| ST893 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 25-1-101-1-10-1-100 | |
| ST4382 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 2-1-1-14-1-1-12 | |
| ST469 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 2-1-2-1-10-1-4 | |
| ST23 | 0(0) | 1(11.1) | 2-1-1-1-9-4-12 | |
| K54 | 0(0) | 0(0) | ||
| K57 | 8(25.0) | 0(0)** | ||
| ST412 | 5(62.5) | 2-1-2-1-9-1-112 | 0(0) | |
| ST15 | 2(25.0) | 1-1-1-1-1-1-1 | 0(0) | |
| ST1824 | 11(2.5) | 2-1-1-1-12-1-34 | 0(0) |
| 项目 | 疫情前/[株(%)] | 疫情后/[株(%)] |
|---|---|---|
| K1 | ||
| rmpA+rmpA2+magA+ iucA+kfu+allS | 2(40.0) | 0(0) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iroN+ magA+allS | 0(0) | 1(20.0) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iroN+ magA+kfu+allS | 0(0) | 4(80.0) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+magA+ iucA | 1(20.0) | 0(0) |
| rmpA+magA | 1(20.0) | 0(0) |
| magA+iucA+kfu+allS | 1(20.0) | 0(0) |
| K2 | ||
| rmpA+rmpA2+iucA+kfu | 3(60.0) | 0(0)* |
| rmpA+iroN | 0(0) | 2(18.2) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iroN | 0(0) | 7(63.6)* |
| rmpA+iroN+allS | 0(0) | 1(9.1) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iroN+ allS | 0(0) | 1(9.1) |
| rmpA+iucA | 2(40.0) | 0(0) |
| K5 | ||
| rmpA+rmpA2+iucA+ iroN | 2(66.7) | 0(0) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iroN+ kfu+allS | 0(0) | 1(14.3) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iroN | 0(0) | 3(42.9) |
| rmpA+iroN+kfu | 0(0) | 1(14.3) |
| iucA+iroN+kfu+allS | 0(0) | 1(14.3) |
| rmpA+iroN | 1(33.3) | 0(0)* |
| 未检出上述基因型 | 0(0) | 1(14.3) |
| K20 | ||
| rmpA+iucA+kfu | 1(9.1) | 0(0) |
| rmpA+iucA | 4(36.4) | 0(0) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iucA+ iroN | 0(0) | 1(11.1) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iroN | 0(0) | 2(22.2) |
| rmpA+iroN | 0(0) | 2(22.2) |
| iucA+iroN+kfu+allS | 0(0) | 3(33.3) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iroN+ magA+iucA+kfu+allS | 0(0) | 1(11.1) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iucA | 2(18.2) | 0(0) |
| rmpA2+iucA | 1(9.1) | 0(0) |
| rmpA | 3(27.3) | 0(0) |
| K57 | ||
| rmpA+rmpA2+iucA | 5(62.5) | 0(0)** |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iucA+kfu | 1(12.5) | 0(0)** |
| rmpA2+iucA | 2(25.0) | 0(0)** |
表3 疫情前后hmKp毒力基因携带模式比较
| 项目 | 疫情前/[株(%)] | 疫情后/[株(%)] |
|---|---|---|
| K1 | ||
| rmpA+rmpA2+magA+ iucA+kfu+allS | 2(40.0) | 0(0) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iroN+ magA+allS | 0(0) | 1(20.0) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iroN+ magA+kfu+allS | 0(0) | 4(80.0) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+magA+ iucA | 1(20.0) | 0(0) |
| rmpA+magA | 1(20.0) | 0(0) |
| magA+iucA+kfu+allS | 1(20.0) | 0(0) |
| K2 | ||
| rmpA+rmpA2+iucA+kfu | 3(60.0) | 0(0)* |
| rmpA+iroN | 0(0) | 2(18.2) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iroN | 0(0) | 7(63.6)* |
| rmpA+iroN+allS | 0(0) | 1(9.1) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iroN+ allS | 0(0) | 1(9.1) |
| rmpA+iucA | 2(40.0) | 0(0) |
| K5 | ||
| rmpA+rmpA2+iucA+ iroN | 2(66.7) | 0(0) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iroN+ kfu+allS | 0(0) | 1(14.3) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iroN | 0(0) | 3(42.9) |
| rmpA+iroN+kfu | 0(0) | 1(14.3) |
| iucA+iroN+kfu+allS | 0(0) | 1(14.3) |
| rmpA+iroN | 1(33.3) | 0(0)* |
| 未检出上述基因型 | 0(0) | 1(14.3) |
| K20 | ||
| rmpA+iucA+kfu | 1(9.1) | 0(0) |
| rmpA+iucA | 4(36.4) | 0(0) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iucA+ iroN | 0(0) | 1(11.1) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iroN | 0(0) | 2(22.2) |
| rmpA+iroN | 0(0) | 2(22.2) |
| iucA+iroN+kfu+allS | 0(0) | 3(33.3) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iroN+ magA+iucA+kfu+allS | 0(0) | 1(11.1) |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iucA | 2(18.2) | 0(0) |
| rmpA2+iucA | 1(9.1) | 0(0) |
| rmpA | 3(27.3) | 0(0) |
| K57 | ||
| rmpA+rmpA2+iucA | 5(62.5) | 0(0)** |
| rmpA+rmpA2+iucA+kfu | 1(12.5) | 0(0)** |
| rmpA2+iucA | 2(25.0) | 0(0)** |
| 项目 | 疫情前 | 疫情后 |
|---|---|---|
| rmpA | ||
| K1 | 100.0(5/5) | 100.0(5/5) |
| K2 | 100.0(5/5) | 100.0(11/11) |
| K5 | 100.0(3/3) | 71.4(5/7) |
| K20 | 90.9(10/11) | 66.7(6/9) |
| K57 | 75.0(6/8) | 0.0(0/0) |
| 合计 | 90.6(29/32) | 84.4(27/32) |
| rmpA2 | ||
| K1 | 60.0(3/5) | 100.0(5/5) |
| K2 | 60.0(3/5) | 72.7(8/11) |
| K5 | 66.7(2/3) | 57.1(4/7) |
| K20 | 9.1(3/11) | 44.4(4/9) |
| K57 | 100.0(8/8) | 0.0(0/0)** |
| 合计 | 53.1(19/32) | 65.6(21/32) |
| iroN | ||
| K1 | 0.0(0/5) | 100.0(5/5)** |
| K2 | 0.0(0/5) | 100.0(11/11) |
| K5 | 100.0(3/3) | 85.7(6/7) |
| K20 | 0.0(0/11) | 100.0(9/9) |
| K57 | 0.0(0/8) | 0.0(0/0) |
| 合计 | 9.4(3/32) | 96.9(31/32) |
| magA | ||
| K1 | 100.0(5/5) | 100.0(5/5) |
| K2 | 0.0(0/5) | 0.0(0/11) |
| K5 | 0.0(0/3) | 0.0(0/7) |
| K20 | 0.0(0/11) | 11.1(1/9) |
| K57 | 0.0(0/8) | 0.0(0/0) |
| 合计 | 15.6(5/32) | 18.8(6/32) |
| iucA | ||
| K1 | 80.0(4/5) | 0.0(0/5)* |
| K2 | 100.0(5/5) | 0.0(0/11)*** |
| K5 | 66.7(2/3) | 14.3(1/7) |
| K20 | 72.7(8/11) | 55.6(5/9) |
| K57 | 100.0(8/8) | 0.0(0/0) |
| 合计 | 84.4(27/32) | 18.8(6/32)*** |
| kfu | ||
| K1 | 60.0(3/5) | 80.0(4/5) |
| K2 | 60.0(3/5) | 0.0(0/11)* |
| K5 | 0.0(0/3) | 42.9(3/7) |
| K20 | 9.1(1/11) | 44.4(4/9) |
| K57 | 12.5(1/8) | 0.0(0/0) |
| 合计 | 25.0(8/32) | 34.4(11/32) |
| allS | ||
| K1 | 60.0(3/5) | 100.0(5/5) |
| K2 | 0.0(0/5) | 18.2(2/11) |
| K5 | 0.0(0/3) | 28.6(2/7) |
| K20 | 0.0(0/11) | 44.4(4/9)* |
| K57 | 0.0(0/8) | 0.0(0/0) |
| 合计 | 9.4(3/32) | 40.6(13/32)** |
表4 疫情前后hmKp毒力基因谱比较 %(株/株)
| 项目 | 疫情前 | 疫情后 |
|---|---|---|
| rmpA | ||
| K1 | 100.0(5/5) | 100.0(5/5) |
| K2 | 100.0(5/5) | 100.0(11/11) |
| K5 | 100.0(3/3) | 71.4(5/7) |
| K20 | 90.9(10/11) | 66.7(6/9) |
| K57 | 75.0(6/8) | 0.0(0/0) |
| 合计 | 90.6(29/32) | 84.4(27/32) |
| rmpA2 | ||
| K1 | 60.0(3/5) | 100.0(5/5) |
| K2 | 60.0(3/5) | 72.7(8/11) |
| K5 | 66.7(2/3) | 57.1(4/7) |
| K20 | 9.1(3/11) | 44.4(4/9) |
| K57 | 100.0(8/8) | 0.0(0/0)** |
| 合计 | 53.1(19/32) | 65.6(21/32) |
| iroN | ||
| K1 | 0.0(0/5) | 100.0(5/5)** |
| K2 | 0.0(0/5) | 100.0(11/11) |
| K5 | 100.0(3/3) | 85.7(6/7) |
| K20 | 0.0(0/11) | 100.0(9/9) |
| K57 | 0.0(0/8) | 0.0(0/0) |
| 合计 | 9.4(3/32) | 96.9(31/32) |
| magA | ||
| K1 | 100.0(5/5) | 100.0(5/5) |
| K2 | 0.0(0/5) | 0.0(0/11) |
| K5 | 0.0(0/3) | 0.0(0/7) |
| K20 | 0.0(0/11) | 11.1(1/9) |
| K57 | 0.0(0/8) | 0.0(0/0) |
| 合计 | 15.6(5/32) | 18.8(6/32) |
| iucA | ||
| K1 | 80.0(4/5) | 0.0(0/5)* |
| K2 | 100.0(5/5) | 0.0(0/11)*** |
| K5 | 66.7(2/3) | 14.3(1/7) |
| K20 | 72.7(8/11) | 55.6(5/9) |
| K57 | 100.0(8/8) | 0.0(0/0) |
| 合计 | 84.4(27/32) | 18.8(6/32)*** |
| kfu | ||
| K1 | 60.0(3/5) | 80.0(4/5) |
| K2 | 60.0(3/5) | 0.0(0/11)* |
| K5 | 0.0(0/3) | 42.9(3/7) |
| K20 | 9.1(1/11) | 44.4(4/9) |
| K57 | 12.5(1/8) | 0.0(0/0) |
| 合计 | 25.0(8/32) | 34.4(11/32) |
| allS | ||
| K1 | 60.0(3/5) | 100.0(5/5) |
| K2 | 0.0(0/5) | 18.2(2/11) |
| K5 | 0.0(0/3) | 28.6(2/7) |
| K20 | 0.0(0/11) | 44.4(4/9)* |
| K57 | 0.0(0/8) | 0.0(0/0) |
| 合计 | 9.4(3/32) | 40.6(13/32)** |
| 抗菌药物 | 疫情前/ [株(%)] | 疫情后/ [株(%)] | 合计/ [株(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|
| 阿莫西林-克拉维酸 | 5(15.63) | 4(12.50) | 9(14.06) |
| 哌他西林-他唑巴坦 | 5(15.63) | 3(9.38) | 8(12.50) |
| 头孢呋辛 | 6(18.75) | 6(18.75) | 12(18.75) |
| 头孢西丁 | 6(18.75) | 6(18.75) | 12(18.75) |
| 头孢他啶 | 6(18.75) | 4(9.38) | 10(15.63) |
| 头孢曲松 | 6(18.75) | 5(15.63) | 11(17.19) |
| 头孢哌酮-舒巴坦 | 3(9.38) | 4(12.50) | 7(10.94) |
| 头孢吡肟 | 6(18.75) | 3(9.38) | 9(14.06) |
| 厄他培南 | 4(12.50) | 3(9.38) | 7(10.94) |
| 亚胺培南 | 3(9.38) | 2(6.25) | 5(7.81) |
| 阿米卡星 | 2(6.25) | 1(3.13) | 3(4.69) |
| 左氧氟沙星 | 6(18.75) | 2(6.25) | 8(12.50) |
| 替加环素 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| 复方磺胺甲噁唑 | 4(12.5) | 2(6.25) | 6(9.38) |
表5 不同时间段hmKp耐药表型分析
| 抗菌药物 | 疫情前/ [株(%)] | 疫情后/ [株(%)] | 合计/ [株(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|
| 阿莫西林-克拉维酸 | 5(15.63) | 4(12.50) | 9(14.06) |
| 哌他西林-他唑巴坦 | 5(15.63) | 3(9.38) | 8(12.50) |
| 头孢呋辛 | 6(18.75) | 6(18.75) | 12(18.75) |
| 头孢西丁 | 6(18.75) | 6(18.75) | 12(18.75) |
| 头孢他啶 | 6(18.75) | 4(9.38) | 10(15.63) |
| 头孢曲松 | 6(18.75) | 5(15.63) | 11(17.19) |
| 头孢哌酮-舒巴坦 | 3(9.38) | 4(12.50) | 7(10.94) |
| 头孢吡肟 | 6(18.75) | 3(9.38) | 9(14.06) |
| 厄他培南 | 4(12.50) | 3(9.38) | 7(10.94) |
| 亚胺培南 | 3(9.38) | 2(6.25) | 5(7.81) |
| 阿米卡星 | 2(6.25) | 1(3.13) | 3(4.69) |
| 左氧氟沙星 | 6(18.75) | 2(6.25) | 8(12.50) |
| 替加环素 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| 复方磺胺甲噁唑 | 4(12.5) | 2(6.25) | 6(9.38) |
| [1] |
WANG L, ZHANG Y, LIU Y, et al. Effects of chlorogenic acid on antimicrobial,antivirulence,and anti-quorum sensing of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae[J]. Front Microbiol, 2022, 13:997310.
DOI URL |
| [2] | KARAMPATAKIS T, TSERGOULI K, BEHZADI P. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae:virulence factors,molecular epidemiology and latest updates in treatment options[J]. Antibiotics(Basel), 2023, 12(2):234. |
| [3] |
ROJAS D, MARCOLETA A E, GÁLVEZ-SILVA M, et al. Inorganic polyphosphate affects biofilm assembly,capsule formation,and virulence of hypervirulent ST23 Klebsiella pneumoniae[J]. ACS Infect Dis, 2024, 10(2):606-623.
DOI URL |
| [4] | ALTAYB H N, ELBADAWI H S, BAOTHMAN O, et al. Genomic analysis of multidrug-resistant hypervirulent(hypermucoviscous) Klebsiella pneumoniae strain lacking the hypermucoviscous regulators(rmpA/rmpA2)[J]. Antibiotics(Basel), 2022, 11(5):596. |
| [5] |
WU J W, WANG J T, LIN T L, et al. Identification of three capsule depolymerases in a bacteriophage infecting Klebsiella pneumoniae capsular types K7,K20,and K27 and therapeutic application[J]. J Biomed Sci, 2023, 30(1):31.
DOI |
| [6] |
NAMIKAWA H, OINUMA K, YAMADA K, et al. Differences in severity of bacteraemia caused by hypermucoviscous and non-hypermucoviscous Klebsiella pneumoniae[J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2023, 61(5):106767.
DOI URL |
| [7] | 周庭银, 胡继红, 吴文娟, 等. 临床微生物检验标准化操作程序[M]. 2版. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2024. |
| [8] |
NAMIKAWA H, OINUMA K, KANEKO Y, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in hypermucoviscous and non-hypermucoviscous Klebsiella pneumoniae:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Emerg Microbes Infect, 2025, 14(1):2438657.
DOI URL |
| [9] | 中国老年医学学会检验医学分会,上海市医学会检验医学专科分会,上海市微生物学会临床微生物学专业委员会. 高毒力肺炎克雷伯菌实验室检测专家共识[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2023, 46(11):1164-1172. |
| [10] |
FANG C, LAI S, YI W, et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae genotype K1:an emerging pathogen that causes septic ocular or central nervous system complications from pyogenic liver abscess[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2007, 45(3):284-293.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
TURTON J F, PERRY C, ELGOHARI S, et al. PCR characterization and typing of Klebsiella pneumoniae using capsular type-specific,variable number tandem repeat and virulence gene targets[J]. J Med Microbiol, 2010, 59(Pt 5):541-547.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
SSEKATAWA K, BYARUGABA D K, NAKAVUMA J L, et al. Prevalence of pathogenic Klebsiella pneumoniae based on PCR capsular typing harbouring carbapenemases encoding genes in Uganda tertiary hospitals[J]. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 2021, 10(1):57.
DOI |
| [13] | GUO Y, WANG S, ZHAN L, et al. Microbiological and clinical characteristics of hypermucoviscous Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates associated with invasive infections in China[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2017, 7:24. |
| [14] | Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing[S]. M100-Ed34,CLSI, 2024. |
| [15] |
LI X, CHEN S, LU Y, et al. Molecular epidemiology and genetic dynamics of carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in China[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2025, 15:1529929.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
HENG H, SUN R, YANG X, et al. Profiling the landscape of carbapenem resistance and hypervirulence in Klebsiella pneumoniae:a global epidemiological analysis of the plasmidome[J]. Drug Resist Updat, 2025, 81:101254.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
SATI H, CARRARA E, SAVOLDI A, et al. The WHO bacterial priority pathogens list 2024:a prioritisation study to guide research,development,and public health strategies against antimicrobial resistance[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2025, 25(9):1033-1043.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
XU L, LI J, WU W, et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae capsular polysaccharide:mechanism in regulation of synthesis,virulence,and pathogenicity[J]. Virulence, 2024, 15(1):2439509.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
MAGILL S S, O'LEARY E,JANELLE S J,et al. Changes in prevalence of health care-associated infections in U.S. hospitals[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379(18):1732-1744.
DOI URL |
| [20] | RUSSO T A, OLSON R, FANG C, et al. Identification of biomarkers for differentiation of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae from classical K. pneumoniae[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2018, 56(9):e00776-18. |
| [21] |
LIU C, GUO J. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae(hypermucoviscous and aerobactin positive)infection over 6 years in the elderly in China:antimicrobial resistance patterns,molecular epidemiology and risk factor[J]. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 2019, 18(1):4.
DOI |
| [22] |
JIN M, JIA T, LIU X, et al. Clinical and genomic analysis of hypermucoviscous Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates:identification of new hypermucoviscosity associated genes[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2022, 12:1063406.
DOI URL |
| [23] |
LAN P, LU Y, FU Y, et al. Siderophores and beyond:a comprehensive review of iron acquisition in Klebsiella pneumoniae[J]. Virulence, 2025, 16(1):2550621.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
TANIMOTO H, SHIGEMURA K, OSAWA K, et al. Comparative genetic analysis of the antimicrobial susceptibilities and virulence of hypermucoviscous and non-hypermucoviscous ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Japan[J]. J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 2023, 56(1):93-103.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
WYRES K L, LAM M M C,HOLT K E. Population genomics of Klebsiella pneumoniae[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2020, 18(6):344-359.
DOI |
| [26] |
WANG Q, CHEN M, OU Q, et al. Carbapenem-resistant hypermucoviscous Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates from a tertiary hospital in China:antimicrobial susceptibility,resistance phenotype,epidemiological characteristics,microbial virulence,and risk factors[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2022, 12:1083009.
DOI URL |
| [27] |
NORDMANN P, POIREL L. Epidemiology and diagnostics of carbapenem resistance in gram-negative bacteria[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2019, 69(Suppl 7):S521-S528.
DOI URL |
| [1] | 戴芸, 黄燕. 上海张江地区体检人群D-二聚体水平分布[J]. 检验医学, 2026, 41(5): 498-501. |
| [2] | 范齐文, 马敏, 胡娟, 毕研月, 吴炯, 侯琦. 上海某院耐大环内酯类大肠弯曲菌和空肠弯曲菌分子耐药特征[J]. 检验医学, 2026, 41(3): 282-286. |
| [3] | 张佳, 吴庆, 张颖, 许锴, 陈杨芳, 邹贺. 温州地区新生儿侵袭性无乳链球菌血清型、耐药性、毒力基因特征[J]. 检验医学, 2026, 41(2): 177-181. |
| [4] | 张超敏, 杨迟晖, 易长林, 陆文苑. 上海地区不同宫颈病变患者人乳头瘤病毒基因型分布[J]. 检验医学, 2026, 41(2): 182-185. |
| [5] | 李媛睿, 刘婧娴, 俞静, 陈峰, 刘瑛, 沈立松. 上海某三级甲等医院儿科ST11和非ST11型碳青霉烯类耐药肺炎克雷伯菌临床分布特征[J]. 检验医学, 2025, 40(9): 907-913. |
| [6] | 曹悦, 孙启娟, 王粟, 潘逸茹, 王诗雯. 上海地区老年人群血清胱抑素C参考区间初探[J]. 检验医学, 2025, 40(8): 731-734. |
| [7] | 杨舒, 杨丽华, 盛峰松, 姜永根, 乔雪飞, 朱添玥, 郁子凡, 唐益明. 基于全基因组测序技术分析101株弯曲菌耐药基因、毒力基因和分子分型特征[J]. 检验医学, 2025, 40(7): 673-679. |
| [8] | 姚玲, 高春燕, 刘明雷. 肺炎链球菌毒力特征及其PBP基因突变和β-内酰胺类耐药情况[J]. 检验医学, 2025, 40(5): 450-454. |
| [9] | 鲍芸, 郁婷婷, 权静, 尹刘翻, 张芃胤, 肖艳群. 上海地区遗传病基因变异高通量测序项目室间质量评价分析[J]. 检验医学, 2025, 40(2): 160-164. |
| [10] | 郭超楠, 王妍妍, 张贝, 庞敬莹, 崔非非, 赵永新, 苏兵. 不同类型临床样本来源肺炎克雷伯菌耐药性和毒力分析[J]. 检验医学, 2024, 39(9): 880-887. |
| [11] | 胡亮, 张泽, 窦馨, 李明超, 周冰鹤, 常东. 上海市浦东地区109 664例人乳头瘤病毒基因分型结果分析[J]. 检验医学, 2024, 39(8): 810-814. |
| [12] | 刘晓文, 邵文琦, 朱晶, 杨静, 张春燕, 潘柏申, 王蓓丽, 郭玮. 间接法建立上海地区人群血清铁蛋白参考区间[J]. 检验医学, 2024, 39(6): 524-529. |
| [13] | 俞凤, 胡龙华, 肖艳萍, 杨军平. 血流感染肺炎克雷伯菌毒力基因分布和临床分子特征[J]. 检验医学, 2024, 39(3): 249-255. |
| [14] | 王正权, 吴正沐, 李文. 上海地区女性卵泡期血清性激素指标长期生物学变异研究[J]. 检验医学, 2024, 39(3): 282-288. |
| [15] | 周宁, 毛敏, 纪昕, 何佳乐, 叶秀云, 林裕博, 钟伟, 刘洋. 致败血症、脑膜炎合并肺炎的14型猪链球菌病原学和分子特征分析[J]. 检验医学, 2024, 39(11): 1042-1047. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||