检验医学 ›› 2013, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (8): 704-706.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2013.08.013

• 技术研究与评价.论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

新型芯片传感-微分电位溶出法测定血铅的探讨

唐寅1,盛青松2,张同军2,辛君伟2   

  1. 1.张家港市中医医院检验科,江苏 张家港 215600;
    2.无锡市申瑞生物制品有限公司,江苏 无锡 214092
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-30 修回日期:2013-08-30 出版日期:2013-08-30 发布日期:2013-08-30
  • 作者简介:唐 寅,男,1974年生,学士,副主任技师,主要从事临床实验室诊断工作。

Study on the new sensor chip-differential potentiometric stripping analysis in the detection of blood lead

TANG Yin1,SHENG Qingsong2,ZHANG Tongjun2,XIN Junwei2.   

  1. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Zhangjiagang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Jiangsu Zhangjiagang 215600,China;
    2. Wuxi Shenrui Biopharmaceuticals Co. Ltd.,Jiangsu Wuxi 214092,China
  • Received:2013-08-30 Revised:2013-08-30 Online:2013-08-30 Published:2013-08-30

摘要: 目的 评价芯片传感-微分电位溶出法在临床血铅检测的准确度和重复性,并与氢化物发生原子荧光法比较,为临床选择检测方法提供参考依据。方法 分别运用芯片传感-微分电位溶出法和氢化物发生原子荧光法同时检测血液样本和标准物质(为2011年全国血铅检测室间质评样本),评价芯片传感-微分电位溶出法的正确度、重复性、回收率、可报告范围和符合率。结果 以靶值±10%作为允许误差,6种标准物质的芯片传感-微分电位溶出法测定结果与靶值比较,均在允许误差范围之内,正确度良好;低、中、高3个水平样本的相对标准偏差(RSD)分别为6.98%、4.09%、2.78%;平均回收率为98.1%,系统比例误差为1.9%;与氢化物发生原子荧光法比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),线性回归分析相关系数(r2)=0.964,2种方法测定结果的符合度为96.4%。结论 芯片传感-微分电位溶出法准确度高、重复性好、精密度佳,适用于临床血铅检测。

关键词: 血铅, 芯片传感器, 微分电位溶出法, 氢化物发生原子荧光法

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of clinical blood lead detection by sensor chip-differential potentiometric stripping analysis and compare with hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry, and to provide the reference for clinical application. Methods The 2 methods were used to analyze the blood samples and the certified reference materials (national blood lead detection external quality assessment samples in 2011). The accuracy, repeatability, recovery rate,acceptable range and coincidence rate of sensor chip-differential potentiometric stripping analysis were evaluated. Results All of the results of 6 certified reference materials were in the allowable error range(target value ?10%), and the accuracy was good. The relative standard deviations (RSD) of the low,medium and high blood lead level blood samples were 6.98%,4.09% and 2.78%, respectively.The average recovery rate was 98.1%, and the system ratio error was 1.9%. Compared the results of sensor chip-differential potentiometric stripping analysis and hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry, the results had no statistical significance(P>0.05), and the correlation coefficient of linear regression analysis(r2) was 0.964. The coincidence rate of the 2 methods was 96.4%. Conclusions sensor chip-differential potentiometric stripping analysis has good accuracy, repeatability and precision, and is suitable for the clinical application of detecting blood lead.

Key words: Blood lead, Sensor chip, Differential potentiometric stripping analysis, Hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry

中图分类号: