Research progress on the application of MALDI-TOF MS in the diagnosis and monitoring of colorectal cancer

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2026.04.002

Abstract

Abstract:

Gene testing has been widely applied in the screening，diagnosis，classification，monitoring and treatment of colorectal cancer. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry （MALDI-TOF MS） has gradually become one of the techniques for determining nucleic acid polymorphisms due to its advantages of high throughput，high sensitivity and high determination efficiency. This review briefly describes the origin and development of nucleic acid mass spectrometry，introduces the principle and method of MALDI-TOF MS for nucleic acid determination，and reviews the targets，projects，applications and clinical value of MALDI-TOF MS in colorectal cancer determination.

Key words: Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, Single nucleotide polymorphism, Gene modification, Colorectal cancer

CLC Number:

R446.1

FAN Yongbing, SHI Mengge, QU Linlin. Research progress on the application of MALDI-TOF MS in the diagnosis and monitoring of colorectal cancer[J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2026, 41(4): 318-325.

Figures/Tables 3

References 73

[1]	DUFFY M J, LAMERZ R, HAGLUND C, et al. Tumor markers in colorectal cancer,gastric cancer and gastrointestinal stromal cancers:European group on tumor markers 2014 guidelines update[J]. Int J Cancer, 2014, 134(11):2513-2522.
[2]	CHURCH T R, WANDELL M, LOFTON-DAY C, et al. Prospective evaluation of methylated SEPT9 in plasma for detection of asymptomatic colorectal cancer[J]. Gut, 2014, 63(2):317-325.
[3]	AMIN M B, GREENE F L, EDGE S B, et al. The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual:continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2017, 67(2):93-99.
[4]	国家卫生健康委员会医政司, 中华医学会肿瘤学分会, 顾晋, 等. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2023版)[J]. 消化肿瘤杂志, 2023,15(3):177-206.
[5]	WU J, LI G, WANG Z, et al. Circulating microRNA-21 is a potential diagnostic biomarker in gastric cancer[J]. Dis Markers, 2015, 2015:435656.
[6]	LECHNER A, WOLFF P, LEIZE-WAGNER E, et al. Characterization of post-transcriptional RNA modifications by sheathless capillary electrophoresis-high resolution mass spectrometry[J]. Anal Chem, 2020, 92(10):7363-7370.
[7]	刘倩倩, 王春玥, 宋晨曦, 等. 基于超高效液相色谱-飞行时间质谱联用的冠心病非靶向代谢组学分析及代谢标记物的探索[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2019, 34(8):752-756.
[8]	韩仁杰, 吴传城, 刘宝英, 等. SNP芯片联合飞行时间质谱筛检胃癌差异的消化道肿瘤相关基因3'UTR区SNPs的病例对照研究[C]//2018环境与健康学术会议——精准环境健康:跨学科合作的挑战论文汇编. 沈阳: 中国环境科学学会环境医学与健康分会,2018:237-238.
[9]	黄盛文, 许吟, 吴娴, 等. 基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱技术在新生儿β-地中海贫血筛查中的应用[J]. 临床检验杂志, 2015, 33(5):341-343.
[10]	段薇. 串联质谱在新生儿遗传性代谢疾病筛查中的应用[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2007, 30(7):816-817.
[11]	NORDHOFF E, LUEBBERT C, THIELE G, et al. Rapid determination of short DNA sequences by the use of MALDI-MS[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2000, 28(20):E86.
[12]	JURINKE C, VAN DEN BOOM D, CANTOR C R, et al. The use of MassARRAY technology for high throughput genotyping[J]. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol, 2002, 77:57-74.
[13]	BERKENKAMP S, KIRPEKAR F, HILLENKAMP F. Infrared MALDI mass spectrometry of large nucleic acids[J]. Science, 1998, 281(5374):260-262.
[14]	SHAHGHOLI M, GARCIA B A, CHIU N H, et al. Sugar additives for MALDI matrices improve signal allowing the smallest nucleotide change (A:T) in a DNA sequence to be resolved[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2001, 29(19):E91.
[15]	ASARA J M, ALLISON J. Enhanced detection of oligonucleotides in UV MALDI MS using the tetraamine spermine as a matrix additive[J]. Anal Chem, 1999, 71(14):2866-2870.
[16]	吴昕哲, 茆海丰, 杨晋, 等. MALDI-TOF MS直接靶板微滴生长测定法在CRKP快速检测中的应用[J]. 检验医学, 2024, 39(6):587-591.
[17]	GARRITSEN H S, FAN A X, BOSSE N, et al. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for genotyping of human platelet-specific antigens[J]. Transfusion, 2009, 49(2):252-258.
[18]	黄伟伦. 基于MALDI-TOF质谱的α-/β-地中海贫血基因快速分型[D]. 广州: 南方医科大学, 2023.
[19]	JIN W, YANG Z, TANG X, et al. Simultaneous quantification of SMN1 and SMN2 copy numbers by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for spinal muscular atrophy genetic testing[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2022, 532:45-52.
[20]	HARIDAN U S, MOKHTAR U, MACHADO L R, et al. A comparison of assays for accurate copy number measurement of the low-affinity Fc gamma receptor genes FCGR3A and FCGR3B[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(1):e0116791.
[21]	CARVALHO HENRIQUES B, BUCHNER A, HU X, et al. Methodology for clinical genotyping of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19[J]. Transl Psychiatry, 2021, 11(1):596.
[22]	BOYLE J, STOCK C J. CYP2D6 expression in veterans experiencing opioid overdose:a postmortem review[J]. Pharmgenomics Pers Med, 2020, 13:289-293.
[23]	SCOTT S A, SCOTT E R, SEKI Y, et al. Development and analytical validation of a 29 gene clinical pharmacogenetic genotyping panel:multi-ethnic allele and copy number variant detection[J]. Clin Transl Sci, 2021, 14(1):204-213.
[24]	HERZOG J S, CHAVARRI-GUERRA Y, CASTILLO D, et al. Genetic epidemiology of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated cancer across Latin America[J]. NPJ Breast Cancer, 2021, 7(1):107.
[25]	尹俊发, 陈少坤, 张宁, 等. 核酸快速酶切及DNA损伤分析的色谱-质谱新方法研究[C]//中国化学会第22届全国色谱学术报告会及仪器展览会论文集(第一卷). 北京: 中国化学会,2019:160-161.
[26]	CLAUS R, WILOP S, HIELSCHER T, et al. A systematic comparison of quantitative high-resolution DNA methylation analysis and methylation-specific PCR[J]. Epigenetics, 2012, 7(7):772-780.
[27]	HO V, ASHBURY J E, TAYLOR S, et al. Quantification of gene-specific methylation of DNMT3B and MTHFR using sequenom EpiTYPER®[J]. Data Brief, 2015, 6:39-46.
[28]	WETZEL A, SCHOLTKA B, SCHUMACHER F, et al. Epigenetic DNA methylation of EBI3 modulates human interleukin-35 formation via NFkB signaling:a promising therapeutic option in ulcerative colitis[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(10):5329.
[29]	MOSKO M J, NAKORCHEVSKY A A, FLORES E, et al. Ultrasensitive detection of multiplexed somatic mutations using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry[J]. J Mol Diagn, 2016, 18(1):23-31.
[30]	LAMY P J, VAN DER LEEST P, LOZANO N, et al. Mass spectrometry as a highly sensitive method for specific circulating tumor DNA analysis in NSCLC:a comparison study[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2020, 12(10):3002.
[31]	BOYSEN A K, PALLISGAARD N, ANDERSEN C S A, et al. Circulating tumor DNA as a marker of minimal residual disease following local treatment of metastases from colorectal cancer[J]. Acta Oncol, 2020, 59(12):1424-1429.
[32]	KRIEGSMANN M, ARENS N, ENDRIS V, et al. Detection of KRAS,NRAS and BRAF by mass spectrometry-a sensitive,reliable,fast and cost-effective technique[J]. Diagn Pathol, 2015, 10:132.
[33]	LADABAUM U, MANNALITHARA A, WENG Y, et al. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with blood-based biomarkers (liquid biopsy) vs fecal tests or colonoscopy[J]. Gastroenterology, 2024, 167(2):378-391.
[34]	ØRNTOFT M B, NIELSEN H J, ØRNTOFT T F, et al. Performance of the colorectal cancer screening marker Sept9 is influenced by age,diabetes and arthritis:a nested case-control study[J]. BMC Cancer, 2015, 15:819.
[35]	XU H, CHEN H, HU J, et al. Feasibility of quantification based on novel evaluation with stool DNA and fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer detection[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2022, 22(1):384.
[36]	DOMINGUEZ-VALENTIN M, HAUPT S, SEPPÄLÄ T T, et al. Mortality by age,gene and gender in carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair gene variants receiving surveillance for early cancer diagnosis and treatment:a report from the prospective Lynch syndrome database[J]. EClinicalMedicine, 2023, 58:101909.
[37]	LAVACCHI D, FANCELLI S, ROVIELLO G, et al. Mutations matter:an observational study of the prognostic and predictive value of KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12:1055019.
[38]	LIN S, GU S, QIAN S, et al. Genome-wide methylation profiling of lncRNAs reveals a novel progression-related and prognostic marker for colorectal cancer[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 11:782077.
[39]	XIE R, YANG X, HE W, et al. LAMP-MS for locus-specific visual quantification of DNA 5 mC and RNA m6A using ultra-low input[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2025, 64(1):e202413872.
[40]	CREMOLINI C, DI BARTOLOMEO M, AMATU A, et al. BRAF codons 594 and 596 mutations identify a new molecular subtype of metastatic colorectal cancer at favorable prognosis[J]. Ann Oncol, 2015, 26(10):2092-2097.
[41]	SHIN S J, CHUN S M, KIM T I, et al. Feasibility of multiplexed gene mutation detection in plasma samples of colorectal cancer patients by mass spectrometric genotyping[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(5):e0176340.
[42]	TSAI H L, LIN C C, SUNG Y C, et al. The emergence of RAS mutations in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC receiving cetuximab as first-line treatment:a noninterventional,uncontrolled multicenter study[J]. Br J Cancer, 2023, 129(6):947-955.
[43]	TAT M, HEIAT M, KARBASI A, et al. Methylation of SEPT9 and LINC00473 genes in circulating cell-free DNA as a potential biomarker for the early detection of colorectal polyps[J]. Adv Biomed Res, 2025, 14:62.
[44]	WU Y, TONG Y, ZHANG H, et al. A novel dual-target Septin9 methylation assay for improved detection of early-stage colorectal cancer and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. BMC Cancer, 2024, 24(1):916.
[45]	LU D C, ZHANG Q F, LI L, et al. Methylated Septin9 has moderate diagnostic value in colorectal cancer detection in Chinese population:a multicenter study[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2022, 22(1):232.
[46]	HE Y, LIU X Y, GONG R, et al. NK homeobox 2.2 functions as tumor suppressor in colorectal cancer due to DNA methylation[J]. J Cancer, 2020, 11(16):4791-4800.
[47]	CLEYLE J, HARDY M P, MINATI R, et al. Immunopeptidomic analyses of colorectal cancers with and without microsatellite instability[J]. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2022, 21(5):100228.
[48]	WU Y, XU J, TAN B, et al. SMAD7 gene polymorphisms and their influence on patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Cell Cycle, 2023, 22(21-22):2424-2435.
[49]	WEN R, ZHOU L, JIANG S, et al. DSTN hypomethylation promotes radiotherapy resistance of rectal cancer by activating the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathway[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2023, 117(1):198-210.
[50]	LI D, WANG Y, DONG C, et al. CST1 inhibits ferroptosis and promotes gastric cancer metastasis by regulating GPX4 protein stability via OTUB1[J]. Oncogene, 2023, 42(2):83-98.
[51]	LIN C C, LIN J K, LIN T C, et al. The prognostic role of microsatellite instability,codon-specific KRAS,and BRAF mutations in colon cancer[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2014, 110(4):451-457.
[52]	BUTTERWORTH A S, HIGGINS J P, PHAROAH P. Relative and absolute risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with a family history:a meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2006, 42(2):216-227.
[53]	GARGALLO-PUYELO C J, LANAS Á, CARRERA-LASFUENTES P, et al. Familial colorectal cancer and genetic susceptibility:colorectal risk variants in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 2021, 12(2):e00301.
[54]	WIN A K, DOWTY J G, CLEARY S P, et al. Risk of colorectal cancer for carriers of mutations in MUTYH,with and without a family history of cancer[J]. Gastroenterology, 2014, 146(5):1208-1211.e1-5.
[55]	LUO C Y, ZHANG Y H, LU M, et al. Research on applying genetic and environmental risk score in risk-adapted colorectal cancer screening[J]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi, 2023, 44(6):999-1005.
[56]	CHEN C Y, WU J J, LIN Y J, et al. Significance of hypermethylation of tumor-suppressor genes PTGER4 and ZNF43 at CpG sites in the prognosis of colorectal cancer[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(18):10225.
[57]	MUTHUSAMI S, RAMACHANDRAN I K, BABU K N, et al. Role of inflammation in the development of colorectal cancer[J]. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets, 2021, 21(1):77-90.
[58]	TAKAHASHI S, OKAMOTO K, TANAHASHI T, et al. S100P expression via DNA hypomethylation promotes cell growth in the sessile serrated adenoma/polyp-cancer sequence[J]. Digestion, 2021, 102(5):789-802.
[59]	ZHU L, ZHENG Y, WU T, et al. Immune-related genes STIM1,ITPKC and PELI1 polymorphisms are associated with risk of colorectal cancer[J]. Eur J Cancer Prev, 2021, 30(5):357-363.
[60]	CEVIK M, NAMAL E, DINC-SENER N, et al. Investigation of vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphisms on risk,metastasis,laterality,and prognosis of colorectal cancer in Turkish subjects[J]. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers, 2022, 26(5):298-306.
[61]	BYKANOVA M A, SOLODILOVA M A, AZAROVA I E, et al. Genetic variation at the catalytic subunit of glutamate cysteine ligase contributes to the susceptibility to sporadic colorectal cancer:a pilot study[J]. Mol Biol Rep, 2022, 49(7):6145-6154.
[62]	CHEN X, MAO D, LI D, et al. Identification and validation of a PD-L1-related signature from mass spectrometry in gastric cancer[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2023, 149(9):5871-5884.
[63]	FELIU J, GÁMEZ-POZO A, MARTÍNEZ-PÉREZ D, et al. Functional proteomics of colon cancer consensus molecular subtypes[J]. Br J Cancer, 2024, 130(10):1670-1678.
[64]	CHANG C L, HUANG K C, CHEN T W, et al. Impact of pattern recognition receptors on the prognosis of chemotherapy-treated rectal cancer patients[J]. In Vivo, 2023, 37(4):1552-1561.
[65]	WU H, HE G, HAN H, et al. Analysis of MIR155HG variants and colorectal cancer susceptibility in Han Chinese population[J]. Mol Genet Genomic Med, 2019, 7(8):e778.
[66]	ZHAN X, BAI F, LIN S, et al. C5orf66 rs4976270/rs639933 are associated with colorectal cancer risk in Southern Chinese Han population:a case-control study[J]. Digestion, 2022, 103(2):103-115.
[67]	KIM J G, CHAE Y S, LEE S J, et al. Genetic variation in microRNA-binding site and prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2015, 141(1):35-41.
[68]	GARGALLO-PUYELO C J, AZNAR-GIMENO R, CARRERA-LASFUENTES P, et al. Predictive value of genetic risk scores in the development of colorectal adenomas[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2022, 67(8):4049-4058.
[69]	SHARMA B, ANGURANA S, BHAT A, et al. Genetic analysis of colorectal carcinoma using high throughput single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping technique within the population of Jammu and Kashmir[J]. Mol Biol Rep, 2021, 48(8):5889-5895.
[70]	LIU X, YANG K, LI Z, et al. MMP2 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer susceptibility in a Chinese Han population[J]. Int J Gen Med, 2022, 15:6009-6019.
[71]	LI H, LIU Y, LIU J, et al. Assessment of ADCY9 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk in the Chinese Han population[J]. J Gene Med, 2021, 23(2):e3298.
[72]	CEVIK M, NAMAL E, INER-KOKSAL U, et al. Association of PD-1 and PDL-1 gene polymorphisms with colorectal cancer risk and prognosis[J]. Mol Biol Rep, 2022, 49(3):1827-1836.
[73]	CHEN H, YIN L, YANG J, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in genes regulating cell death and prognosis of patients with rectal cancer receiving postoperative chemoradiotherapy[J]. Cancer Biol Med, 2023, 20(4):297-316.

方法	靶点	样本类型	敏感性	特异性	检测成本
MALDI-TOF MS^[32]	多靶点（甲基化+SNP+ 突变）	血液、粪便、组织	85%~92% （早期）	90%~95%	低（10~50元·样本^-1）
多靶点粪便DNA检测^[33]	KRAS突变+NDRG4/BMP3甲基化+血红蛋白	粪便	92% （晚期）	87%	中（约180美元·样本^-1）
实时荧光定量PCR^[34]	SEPT9甲基化	血液	73%	80%~85%	中（约10.4美元·样本^-1）
多靶点粪便FIT-DNA联合检测技术^[35]	多甲基化标志物	粪便	92%	88%	高（57~224美元·样本^-1）

方法	靶点	样本类型	敏感性	特异性	检测成本
MALDI-TOF MS^[32]	多靶点（甲基化+SNP+ 突变）	血液、粪便、组织	85%~92% （早期）	90%~95%	低（10~50元·样本^-1）
多靶点粪便DNA检测^[33]	KRAS突变+NDRG4/BMP3甲基化+血红蛋白	粪便	92% （晚期）	87%	中（约180美元·样本^-1）
实时荧光定量PCR^[34]	SEPT9甲基化	血液	73%	80%~85%	中（约10.4美元·样本^-1）
多靶点粪便FIT-DNA联合检测技术^[35]	多甲基化标志物	粪便	92%	88%	高（57~224美元·样本^-1）

文献	基因名称	类别	例数	样本类型	风险统计值	用途	临床意义
WU等^[65]	lncRNA MIR155HG	SNP	1 024例	外周血	OR=1.32，95%CI为1.02~1.71，P=0.036	高风险评估	筛查
LIU等^[70]	MMP2	SNP	1 326例	外周血	OR=0.77，95%CI为0.60~0.98，P<0.05	低风险评估	筛查
KIM等^[67]	PAUF	SNP	831例	肿瘤组织	OS：HR^①=1.95，95%CI为1.42~2.67，P<0.000 1 DFS^②：HR=1.59，95%CI为1.21~2.08，P<0.000 1	术后高风险评估	预后监测
KIM等^[67]	TPST1	SNP	831例	肿瘤组织	DFS：HR=2.65，95%CI为1.58~4.45，P=0.000 2	术后高风险评估	预后监测
LI等^[71]	ADCY9	SNP	1 022例	外周血	OR=3.54，95%CI为1.16~10.86，P=0.027	高风险评估	筛查
CHEN等^[56]	PTGER4	DNA甲基化	208例	肿瘤组织	OS：HR=4.32，95%CI为1.80~10.50，P=0.007	术后高风险评估	预后监测
CHEN等^[56]	ZNF43	DNA甲基化	208例	肿瘤组织	RFS：HR=2.33，95%CI为1.07~5.08，P<0.001	术后高风险评估	预后监测
文献	基因名称	类别	例数	样本类型	风险统计值	用途	临床意义
LIN等^[38]	lncRNA DLX6-AS1	DNA甲基化	433例	肿瘤组织	OS：HR=1.64，95%CI为1.02~2.64，P=0.042	预测标志物	诊断、监测
WU等^[48]	SMAD7	SNP	1 392例	外周血	OR=1.31，95%CI为1.04~1.67，P=0.024	预测标志物	诊断、监测
CEVIK等^[72]	PD-1/PDL-1	SNP	189例	外周血	OR=0.068，95%CI为0.02~0.21，P<0.001	预后标志物	预后监测
CHANG等^[64]	PRR相关基因	SNP	117例	肿瘤组织	OS：HR=4.674，95%CI为1.42~16.04，P=0.011	预后标志物	预后监测
CHEN等^[73]	ALOX5	SNP	300例	外周血	OS：HR=3.32，95%CI为1.51~7.27，P=0.003	预测标志物	预后监测
DOMINGUEZ-VALENTIN等^[36]	致病性MMR相关基因	SNP	569例	外周血	HR=1.49，95%CI为1.06~2.09，P=0.030	预测标志物	预测、诊断

文献	基因名称	类别	例数	样本类型	风险统计值	用途	临床意义
WU等^[65]	lncRNA MIR155HG	SNP	1 024例	外周血	OR=1.32，95%CI为1.02~1.71，P=0.036	高风险评估	筛查
LIU等^[70]	MMP2	SNP	1 326例	外周血	OR=0.77，95%CI为0.60~0.98，P<0.05	低风险评估	筛查
KIM等^[67]	PAUF	SNP	831例	肿瘤组织	OS：HR^①=1.95，95%CI为1.42~2.67，P<0.000 1 DFS^②：HR=1.59，95%CI为1.21~2.08，P<0.000 1	术后高风险评估	预后监测
KIM等^[67]	TPST1	SNP	831例	肿瘤组织	DFS：HR=2.65，95%CI为1.58~4.45，P=0.000 2	术后高风险评估	预后监测
LI等^[71]	ADCY9	SNP	1 022例	外周血	OR=3.54，95%CI为1.16~10.86，P=0.027	高风险评估	筛查
CHEN等^[56]	PTGER4	DNA甲基化	208例	肿瘤组织	OS：HR=4.32，95%CI为1.80~10.50，P=0.007	术后高风险评估	预后监测
CHEN等^[56]	ZNF43	DNA甲基化	208例	肿瘤组织	RFS：HR=2.33，95%CI为1.07~5.08，P<0.001	术后高风险评估	预后监测
文献	基因名称	类别	例数	样本类型	风险统计值	用途	临床意义
LIN等^[38]	lncRNA DLX6-AS1	DNA甲基化	433例	肿瘤组织	OS：HR=1.64，95%CI为1.02~2.64，P=0.042	预测标志物	诊断、监测
WU等^[48]	SMAD7	SNP	1 392例	外周血	OR=1.31，95%CI为1.04~1.67，P=0.024	预测标志物	诊断、监测
CEVIK等^[72]	PD-1/PDL-1	SNP	189例	外周血	OR=0.068，95%CI为0.02~0.21，P<0.001	预后标志物	预后监测
CHANG等^[64]	PRR相关基因	SNP	117例	肿瘤组织	OS：HR=4.674，95%CI为1.42~16.04，P=0.011	预后标志物	预后监测
CHEN等^[73]	ALOX5	SNP	300例	外周血	OS：HR=3.32，95%CI为1.51~7.27，P=0.003	预测标志物	预后监测
DOMINGUEZ-VALENTIN等^[36]	致病性MMR相关基因	SNP	569例	外周血	HR=1.49，95%CI为1.06~2.09，P=0.030	预测标志物	预测、诊断