Laboratory Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 25-31.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2025.01.005
Previous Articles Next Articles
DING Jing1, LI Huidan1, ZHANG Chunling1, WANG Xiaorui1, LIU Weiling1, LIN Lihui1, QIU Huiying2()
Received:
2024-05-07
Revised:
2024-08-12
Online:
2025-01-30
Published:
2025-02-17
CLC Number:
DING Jing, LI Huidan, ZHANG Chunling, WANG Xiaorui, LIU Weiling, LIN Lihui, QIU Huiying. Analysis of laboratory diagnosis and prognostic factors of myeloid neoplasms based on different classification criteria[J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2025, 40(1): 25-31.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.shjyyx.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2025.01.005
组别 | 例数 | 性别 | 年龄/岁 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
男/例 | 女/例 | |||
A组 | 30 | 18 | 12 | 50(31~75) |
B组 | 61 | 31 | 30 | 57(25~84) |
亚组1 | 26 | 12 | 14 | 54(26~84) |
亚组2 | 35 | 19 | 16 | 58(25~74) |
C组 | 145 | 94 | 51 | 49(15~85)* |
统计值 | 3.534 | 7.361 | ||
P值 | 0.171 | 0.025 |
组别 | 例数 | 性别 | 年龄/岁 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
男/例 | 女/例 | |||
A组 | 30 | 18 | 12 | 50(31~75) |
B组 | 61 | 31 | 30 | 57(25~84) |
亚组1 | 26 | 12 | 14 | 54(26~84) |
亚组2 | 35 | 19 | 16 | 58(25~74) |
C组 | 145 | 94 | 51 | 49(15~85)* |
统计值 | 3.534 | 7.361 | ||
P值 | 0.171 | 0.025 |
组别 | 例数 | 血红蛋白含量/(g·L-1) | 血小板计数/(×109·L-1) | 白细胞计数/(×109·L-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A组 | 30 | 74.5(34.0~128.0) | 48.0(9.0~342.0) | 2.64(0.86~46.00) |
B组 | 61 | 69.0(43.0~123.0) | 37.0(1.0~173.0) | 2.35(0.39~76.14) |
亚组1 | 26 | 66.5(43.0~114.0) | 33.5(7.0~129.0) | 1.80(0.39~8.90) |
亚组2 | 35 | 69.0(46.0~123.0) | 37.0(1.0~173.0) | 3.41(0.71~76.14)# |
C组 | 145 | 83.0(42.0~140.0)* | 36.0(1.0~967.0) | 21.75(0.19~379.82)* |
统计值 | 14.774 | 2.928 | 60.984 | |
P值 | 0.001 | 0.231 | <0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | 血红蛋白含量/(g·L-1) | 血小板计数/(×109·L-1) | 白细胞计数/(×109·L-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A组 | 30 | 74.5(34.0~128.0) | 48.0(9.0~342.0) | 2.64(0.86~46.00) |
B组 | 61 | 69.0(43.0~123.0) | 37.0(1.0~173.0) | 2.35(0.39~76.14) |
亚组1 | 26 | 66.5(43.0~114.0) | 33.5(7.0~129.0) | 1.80(0.39~8.90) |
亚组2 | 35 | 69.0(46.0~123.0) | 37.0(1.0~173.0) | 3.41(0.71~76.14)# |
C组 | 145 | 83.0(42.0~140.0)* | 36.0(1.0~967.0) | 21.75(0.19~379.82)* |
统计值 | 14.774 | 2.928 | 60.984 | |
P值 | 0.001 | 0.231 | <0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | 正常核型/ [例(%)] | 额外异常/ [例(%)] | 复杂核型/ [例(%)] |
---|---|---|---|---|
A组 | 29 | 14(48.3) | 13(44.8) | 4(13.8) |
B组 | 47 | 27(57.4) | 18(38.3) | 5(10.6) |
亚组1 | 22 | 9(40.9) | 13(59.1) | 4(18.2) |
亚组2 | 25 | 18(72.0) | 5(20.0)* | 1(4.0) |
C组 | 121 | 65(53.7) | 39(32.2) | 12(9.9) |
统计值 | 0.608 | 1.826 | 0.369 | |
P值 | 0.738 | 0.401 | 0.832 |
组别 | 例数 | 正常核型/ [例(%)] | 额外异常/ [例(%)] | 复杂核型/ [例(%)] |
---|---|---|---|---|
A组 | 29 | 14(48.3) | 13(44.8) | 4(13.8) |
B组 | 47 | 27(57.4) | 18(38.3) | 5(10.6) |
亚组1 | 22 | 9(40.9) | 13(59.1) | 4(18.2) |
亚组2 | 25 | 18(72.0) | 5(20.0)* | 1(4.0) |
C组 | 121 | 65(53.7) | 39(32.2) | 12(9.9) |
统计值 | 0.608 | 1.826 | 0.369 | |
P值 | 0.738 | 0.401 | 0.832 |
组别 | 例数 | 诱导化疗/[例(%)] | 低甲基化药物治疗/[例(%)] | 其他治疗/[例(%)] | 移植/[例(%)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A组 | 30 | 1(3.3) | 5(16.7) | 24(80.0) | 26(86.7) |
B组 | 61 | 35(57.4) | 6(9.8) | 20(32.8) | 39(63.9) |
亚组1 | 26 | 4(15.4) | 4(15.4) | 18(69.2) | 20(76.9) |
亚组2 | 35 | 31(88.6) | 2(5.7) | 2(5.7) | 19(54.3) |
C组 | 145 | 134(92.4) | 1(0.7) | 10(6.9) | 70(48.3) |
统计值 | 107.551 | 16.487 | |||
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | 诱导化疗/[例(%)] | 低甲基化药物治疗/[例(%)] | 其他治疗/[例(%)] | 移植/[例(%)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A组 | 30 | 1(3.3) | 5(16.7) | 24(80.0) | 26(86.7) |
B组 | 61 | 35(57.4) | 6(9.8) | 20(32.8) | 39(63.9) |
亚组1 | 26 | 4(15.4) | 4(15.4) | 18(69.2) | 20(76.9) |
亚组2 | 35 | 31(88.6) | 2(5.7) | 2(5.7) | 19(54.3) |
C组 | 145 | 134(92.4) | 1(0.7) | 10(6.9) | 70(48.3) |
统计值 | 107.551 | 16.487 | |||
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
影响因素 | 单因素分析 | 多因素分析(向前:条件) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P值 | HR值① | 95% CI② | P值 | HR值① | 95% CI② | ||
性别 | 0.143 | 1.340 | 0.906~1.981 | ||||
年龄 | <0.001 | 1.037 | 1.023~1.052 | ||||
原始细胞比例 | 0.006 | 1.010 | 1.003~1.017 | 0.005 | 1.014 | 1.004~1.024 | |
低强度治疗方案 | 0.853 | 1.021 | 0.819~1.272 | <0.001 | 1.820 | 1.302~2.546 | |
造血干细胞移植 | <0.001 | 0.220 | 0.149~0.326 | <0.001 | 0.148 | 0.089~0.248 | |
复杂核型 | 0.012 | 2.043 | 1.174~3.555 | ||||
SF3B1突变 | 0.952 | 0.957 | 0.236~3.890 | ||||
CEBPA突变 | 0.064 | 0.537 | 0.278~1.037 | ||||
TP53突变 | <0.001 | 4.095 | 2.405~6.972 | <0.001 | 5.622 | 3.099~10.199 | |
BCOR突变 | 0.281 | 1.461 | 0.733~2.910 |
影响因素 | 单因素分析 | 多因素分析(向前:条件) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P值 | HR值① | 95% CI② | P值 | HR值① | 95% CI② | ||
性别 | 0.143 | 1.340 | 0.906~1.981 | ||||
年龄 | <0.001 | 1.037 | 1.023~1.052 | ||||
原始细胞比例 | 0.006 | 1.010 | 1.003~1.017 | 0.005 | 1.014 | 1.004~1.024 | |
低强度治疗方案 | 0.853 | 1.021 | 0.819~1.272 | <0.001 | 1.820 | 1.302~2.546 | |
造血干细胞移植 | <0.001 | 0.220 | 0.149~0.326 | <0.001 | 0.148 | 0.089~0.248 | |
复杂核型 | 0.012 | 2.043 | 1.174~3.555 | ||||
SF3B1突变 | 0.952 | 0.957 | 0.236~3.890 | ||||
CEBPA突变 | 0.064 | 0.537 | 0.278~1.037 | ||||
TP53突变 | <0.001 | 4.095 | 2.405~6.972 | <0.001 | 5.622 | 3.099~10.199 | |
BCOR突变 | 0.281 | 1.461 | 0.733~2.910 |
[1] | ARBER D A, ORAZI A, HASSERJIAN R P, et al. International consensus classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias:integrating morphologic,clinical,and genomic data[J]. Blood, 2022, 140(11):1200-1228. |
[2] |
GREENBERG P L, TUECHLER H, SCHANZ J, et al. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes[J]. Blood, 2012, 120:2454-2465.
DOI PMID |
[3] | BERNARD E, TUECHLER H, GREENBERG P L, et al. Molecular international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes[J]. NEJM Evid, 2022, 1(7):EVIDoa2200008. |
[4] | KHOURY J D, SOLARY E, ABLA O, et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours:myeloid and histiocytic/dendritic neoplasms[J]. Leukemia, 2022, 36(7):1703-1719. |
[5] | ESTEY E, HASSERJIAN R P, DÖHNER H. Distinguishing AML from MDS:a fixed blast percentage may no longer be optimal[J]. Blood, 2022, 139(3):323-332. |
[6] |
DINARDO C D, GARCIA-MANERO G, KANTARJIAN H M. Time to blur the blast boundaries[J]. Cancer, 2022, 128(8):1568-1570.
DOI PMID |
[7] | STAHL M, BEWERSDORF J P, XIE Z, et al. Classification,risk stratification and response assessment in myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms(MDS):a state-of-the-art report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS(icMDS)[J]. Blood Rev, 2023, 62:101128. |
[8] | SWERDLOW S H, CAMPO E, HARRIS N L, et al. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues(Revised 4th edition)[M]. Lyon:IARC, 2017. |
[9] | MCGOWAN-JORDAN J, HASTINGS R J, MOORE S, et al. An international system for human cytogenomic nomenclature(2020)[M]. Basel:Karger, 2020. |
[10] | 中华医学会血液学分会白血病淋巴瘤学组. 中国成人急性髓系白血病(非急性早幼粒细胞白血病)诊疗指南(2021年版)[J]. 中华血液学杂志, 2021, 42(8):617-623. |
[11] |
BERSANELLI M, TRAVAGLINO E, MEGGENDORFER M, et al. Classification and personalized prognostic assessment on the basis of clinical and genomic features in myelodysplastic syndromes[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2021, 39(11):1223-1233.
DOI PMID |
[12] | HASSERJIAN R P, CAMPIGOTTO F, KLEPEIS V, et al. De novo acute myeloid leukemia with 20-29% blasts is less aggressive than acute myeloid leukemia with≥30% blasts in older adults:a bone marrow pathology group study[J]. Am J Hematol, 2014, 89(11):E193-9. |
[13] |
BACHER U, KERN W, ALPERMANN T, et al. Prognosis in patients with MDS or AML and bone marrow blasts between 10% and 30% is not associated with blast counts but depends on cytogenetic and molecular genetic characteristics[J]. Leukemia, 2011, 25(8):1361-1364.
DOI PMID |
[14] | ZHANG Y, WU J, XU Z, et al. Impact of the International Consensus Classification of myelodysplastic syndromes[J]. Br J Haematol, 2023, 201(3):443-448. |
[15] | DAVER N G, MAITI A, KADIA T M, et al. TP53-mutated myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia:biology,current therapy,and future directions[J]. Cancer Discov, 2022, 12(11):2516-2529. |
[16] | KHANNA V, LU R, KUMAR J, et al. The clinical,molecular,and prognostic features of the 2022 WHO and ICC classification systems for myelodysplastic neoplasms[J]. Leuk Res, 2024, 136:107433. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||