检验医学 ›› 2013, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 318-321.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2013.04.017

• 教学园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

2004至2011年上海市检验技师专业技能考核评估

王寅   

  1. 上海市临床检验中心,上海 200126
  • 收稿日期:2012-01-18 修回日期:2012-03-31 出版日期:2013-04-30 发布日期:2013-04-05
  • 通讯作者: 王庆忠,联系电话:021-68316300-1203。
  • 作者简介:王寅,女,1980年生,硕士,助理研究员,主要从事卫生事业管理和卫生经济研究。
  • 基金资助:

    上海市科委择优委托项目(09DZ1907100)

Evaluation on the speciality skill examination of laboratory diagnostic residents from 2004 to 2011

  1. Shanghai Center for Clinical Laboratory, Shanghai 200126, China
  • Received:2012-01-18 Revised:2012-03-31 Online:2013-04-30 Published:2013-04-05

摘要: 目的 评估2004至2011年上海市检验技师规范化培训实验诊断学专业培训质量。 方法 对参加2004至2011年上海市检验技师检验专业537名考核考生的成绩进行分析,按不同级别医院(三级综合性医院、三级专科医院、二级医院)分组后进行成绩分析。 结果 三级综合性医院考生参加轮转培训率为100.0%,三级专科医院为90.2%,二级医院为29.7%。操作考试合格率(78%)高于理论考试合格率(63%),生化、血液体液操作考试总体合格率(60%、67%)低于微生物、免疫(80%、98%)。各级别医院考生成绩之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),三级综合性医院考生成绩明显优于三级专科医院和二级医院,三级专科医院优于二级医院。不同级别医院考生生化、血液体液、微生物成绩差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而免疫成绩差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 加强规范化培训和建全考核体系,是提高检验技师人才培养的有效手段。

关键词: 规范化培训, 技能考核, 实验诊断学

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the standardized training quality of laboratory diagnostic residents from 2004 to 2011 in Shanghai.  Methods The scores of 537 examinees, attending Shanghai speciality skill examination of laboratory diagnostic residents from 2004 to 2011, were analyzed. According to the levels of hospitals (Level 3 general hospitals, Level 3 specialized hospitals and Level 2 hospitals), the scores were classified and analyzed. Results The cycle training rates of Level 3 general hospitals, Level 3 specialized hospitals and Level 2 hospitals were 100.0%, 90.2% and 29.7%. The passing percentages of practice parts(78%) were much better than those of theory parts(63%). The passing percentages of biochemistry and hematology (60% and 67%) were poorer than those of microbiology and immunology(80% and 98%). The scores of examinees were statistically significant between the 3 kinds of hospitals(P<0.05). The scores of Level 3 general hospitals were higher than those of the other 2 kinds of hospitals, and the scores of Level 3 specialized hospitals were higher than those of Level 2 hospital. The scores of biochemistry, hematology and microbiology examinees had statistical significance in the 3 kinds of hospitals (P<0.05), but the scores of immunology examinees had no statistical significance(P>0.05). Conclusions Improving the standardized training and examination system is an effective way on improving the speciality skill of laboratory diagnostic residents.

Key words: Standardized training, Speciality skill examination, Laboratory diagnostics