Laboratory Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 363-368.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2024.04.009
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHOU Yufei, LI Yunhui, LI Bingyi, HOU Qingxia()
Received:
2022-11-07
Revised:
2023-07-12
Online:
2024-04-30
Published:
2024-05-07
CLC Number:
ZHOU Yufei, LI Yunhui, LI Bingyi, HOU Qingxia. Relation of C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index with pathological characteristics and prognosis of serous ovarian cancer patients[J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2024, 39(4): 363-368.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.shjyyx.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2024.04.009
组别 | 例数 | 年龄 | 绝经 | FIGO分期 | 组织学分级 | 腹水 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
≤65岁/例 | >65 岁/例 | 是/例 | 否/例 | Ⅰ+Ⅱ期/例 | Ⅲ+Ⅳ期/例 | 低级别/例 | 高级别/例 | 有/例 | 无/例 | ||||||||||
低CAR组 | 66 | 47 | 19 | 43 | 23 | 34 | 32 | 38 | 28 | 41 | 25 | ||||||||
高CAR组 | 66 | 45 | 21 | 43 | 23 | 22 | 44 | 22 | 44 | 30 | 36 | ||||||||
统计值 | 0.143 | 0.000 | 4.466 | 7.822 | 3.688 | ||||||||||||||
P值 | 0.705 | 1.000 | 0.035 | 0.005 | 0.055 | ||||||||||||||
组别 | 肿瘤直径 | 淋巴转移 | CA125 | CAR | SII | ||||||||||||||
<6 cm/例 | ≥6 cm/例 | 是/例 | 否/例 | <35 U·L-1/例 | ≥35 U·L-1/例 | ||||||||||||||
低CAR组 | 40 | 26 | 26 | 40 | 26 | 40 | 0.18±0.08 | 572.52±340.61 | |||||||||||
高CAR组 | 40 | 26 | 43 | 23 | 17 | 49 | 0.61±0.11 | 534.48±330.84 | |||||||||||
统计值 | 0.000 | 8.776 | 2.794 | 26.572 | 0.651 | ||||||||||||||
P值 | 1.000 | 0.003 | 0.095 | <0.001 | 0.516 |
组别 | 例数 | 年龄 | 绝经 | FIGO分期 | 组织学分级 | 腹水 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
≤65岁/例 | >65 岁/例 | 是/例 | 否/例 | Ⅰ+Ⅱ期/例 | Ⅲ+Ⅳ期/例 | 低级别/例 | 高级别/例 | 有/例 | 无/例 | ||||||||||
低CAR组 | 66 | 47 | 19 | 43 | 23 | 34 | 32 | 38 | 28 | 41 | 25 | ||||||||
高CAR组 | 66 | 45 | 21 | 43 | 23 | 22 | 44 | 22 | 44 | 30 | 36 | ||||||||
统计值 | 0.143 | 0.000 | 4.466 | 7.822 | 3.688 | ||||||||||||||
P值 | 0.705 | 1.000 | 0.035 | 0.005 | 0.055 | ||||||||||||||
组别 | 肿瘤直径 | 淋巴转移 | CA125 | CAR | SII | ||||||||||||||
<6 cm/例 | ≥6 cm/例 | 是/例 | 否/例 | <35 U·L-1/例 | ≥35 U·L-1/例 | ||||||||||||||
低CAR组 | 40 | 26 | 26 | 40 | 26 | 40 | 0.18±0.08 | 572.52±340.61 | |||||||||||
高CAR组 | 40 | 26 | 43 | 23 | 17 | 49 | 0.61±0.11 | 534.48±330.84 | |||||||||||
统计值 | 0.000 | 8.776 | 2.794 | 26.572 | 0.651 | ||||||||||||||
P值 | 1.000 | 0.003 | 0.095 | <0.001 | 0.516 |
组别 | 例数 | 年龄 | 绝经 | FIGO分期 | 组织学分级 | 腹水 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
≤65岁/例 | >65岁/例 | 是/例 | 否/例 | Ⅰ+Ⅱ期/例 | Ⅲ+Ⅳ期/例 | 低级别/例 | 高级别/例 | 有/例 | 无/例 | |||||||||
低SII组 | 66 | 46 | 20 | 43 | 23 | 34 | 32 | 36 | 30 | 38 | 28 | |||||||
高SII组 | 66 | 46 | 20 | 43 | 23 | 22 | 44 | 24 | 42 | 33 | 33 | |||||||
统计值 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 4.466 | 4.400 | 0.762 | |||||||||||||
P值 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.035 | 0.036 | 0.383 | |||||||||||||
组别 | 肿瘤直径 | 淋巴转移 | CA125 | CAR | SII | |||||||||||||
<6 cm/例 | ≥6 cm/例 | 是/例 | 否/例 | <35 U·L-1/例 | ≥35 U·L-1/例 | |||||||||||||
低SII组 | 45 | 21 | 26 | 40 | 27 | 39 | 0.38±0.24 | 268.54±134.04 | ||||||||||
高SII组 | 35 | 31 | 43 | 23 | 16 | 50 | 0.40±0.23 | 838.46±208.19 | ||||||||||
统计值 | 3.173 | 8.776 | 4.174 | 0.470 | 18.699 | |||||||||||||
P值 | 0.075 | 0.003 | 0.041 | 0.639 | <0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | 年龄 | 绝经 | FIGO分期 | 组织学分级 | 腹水 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
≤65岁/例 | >65岁/例 | 是/例 | 否/例 | Ⅰ+Ⅱ期/例 | Ⅲ+Ⅳ期/例 | 低级别/例 | 高级别/例 | 有/例 | 无/例 | |||||||||
低SII组 | 66 | 46 | 20 | 43 | 23 | 34 | 32 | 36 | 30 | 38 | 28 | |||||||
高SII组 | 66 | 46 | 20 | 43 | 23 | 22 | 44 | 24 | 42 | 33 | 33 | |||||||
统计值 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 4.466 | 4.400 | 0.762 | |||||||||||||
P值 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.035 | 0.036 | 0.383 | |||||||||||||
组别 | 肿瘤直径 | 淋巴转移 | CA125 | CAR | SII | |||||||||||||
<6 cm/例 | ≥6 cm/例 | 是/例 | 否/例 | <35 U·L-1/例 | ≥35 U·L-1/例 | |||||||||||||
低SII组 | 45 | 21 | 26 | 40 | 27 | 39 | 0.38±0.24 | 268.54±134.04 | ||||||||||
高SII组 | 35 | 31 | 43 | 23 | 16 | 50 | 0.40±0.23 | 838.46±208.19 | ||||||||||
统计值 | 3.173 | 8.776 | 4.174 | 0.470 | 18.699 | |||||||||||||
P值 | 0.075 | 0.003 | 0.041 | 0.639 | <0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | 术后并发症/[例(%)] | 术后残留肿瘤直径<1 cm/[例(%)] | 术后肠道恢复时间/d | 住院时间/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
低CAR组 | 66 | 6(9.1) | 53(80.3) | 2.2±0.9 | 16.3±3.2 |
高CAR组 | 66 | 12(18.2) | 42(63.6) | 2.2±0.9 | 17.1±3.8 |
统计值 | 2.316 | 4.544 | 0.571 | 1.446 | |
P值 | 0.126 | 0.033 | 0.569 | 0.151 |
组别 | 例数 | 术后并发症/[例(%)] | 术后残留肿瘤直径<1 cm/[例(%)] | 术后肠道恢复时间/d | 住院时间/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
低CAR组 | 66 | 6(9.1) | 53(80.3) | 2.2±0.9 | 16.3±3.2 |
高CAR组 | 66 | 12(18.2) | 42(63.6) | 2.2±0.9 | 17.1±3.8 |
统计值 | 2.316 | 4.544 | 0.571 | 1.446 | |
P值 | 0.126 | 0.033 | 0.569 | 0.151 |
组别 | 例数 | 术后并发症/[例(%)] | 术后残留肿瘤直径<1 cm/[例(%)] | 术后肠道恢复时间/d | 住院时间/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
低SII组 | 66 | 5(7.6) | 53(80.3) | 2.1±0.8 | 16.4±3.6 |
高SII组 | 66 | 13(19.7) | 42(63.6) | 2.4±1.0 | 17.0±3.4 |
统计值 | 4.117 | 4.554 | 1.929 | 1.043 | |
P值 | 0.042 | 0.033 | 0.056 | 0.299 |
组别 | 例数 | 术后并发症/[例(%)] | 术后残留肿瘤直径<1 cm/[例(%)] | 术后肠道恢复时间/d | 住院时间/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
低SII组 | 66 | 5(7.6) | 53(80.3) | 2.1±0.8 | 16.4±3.6 |
高SII组 | 66 | 13(19.7) | 42(63.6) | 2.4±1.0 | 17.0±3.4 |
统计值 | 4.117 | 4.554 | 1.929 | 1.043 | |
P值 | 0.042 | 0.033 | 0.056 | 0.299 |
因素 | 单因素分析 | 多因素分析 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | ||
年龄(>65岁) | 1.015(0.519~1.985) | 0.965 | |||
绝经 | 0.806(0.432~1.505) | 0.499 | |||
FIGO分期(Ⅲ+Ⅳ期) | 2.946(1.472~5.897) | 0.002 | 2.258(1.125~4.534) | 0.022 | |
组织学分级(高级别) | 2.222(1.167~4.233) | 0.015 | |||
腹水 | 1.402(0.765~2.570) | 0.274 | |||
肿瘤直径(≥6 cm) | 0.809(0.413~1.584) | 0.537 | |||
淋巴转移 | 2.385(1.263~4.505) | 0.007 | |||
CA125(≥35 U·L-1) | 3.051(1.402~6.639) | 0.005 | |||
CAR | 2.429(1.292~4.565) | 0.006 | 2.665(1.401~5.069) | 0.003 | |
SII | 4.421(2.244~8.712) | <0.001 | 4.432(2.227~8.821) | <0.001 |
因素 | 单因素分析 | 多因素分析 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | ||
年龄(>65岁) | 1.015(0.519~1.985) | 0.965 | |||
绝经 | 0.806(0.432~1.505) | 0.499 | |||
FIGO分期(Ⅲ+Ⅳ期) | 2.946(1.472~5.897) | 0.002 | 2.258(1.125~4.534) | 0.022 | |
组织学分级(高级别) | 2.222(1.167~4.233) | 0.015 | |||
腹水 | 1.402(0.765~2.570) | 0.274 | |||
肿瘤直径(≥6 cm) | 0.809(0.413~1.584) | 0.537 | |||
淋巴转移 | 2.385(1.263~4.505) | 0.007 | |||
CA125(≥35 U·L-1) | 3.051(1.402~6.639) | 0.005 | |||
CAR | 2.429(1.292~4.565) | 0.006 | 2.665(1.401~5.069) | 0.003 | |
SII | 4.421(2.244~8.712) | <0.001 | 4.432(2.227~8.821) | <0.001 |
因素 | 单因素分析 | 多因素分析 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | ||
年龄(>65岁) | 1.345(0.628~2.880) | 0.446 | |||
绝经 | 0.759(0.365~1.578) | 0.460 | |||
FIGO分期(Ⅲ+Ⅳ期) | 5.642(2.129~14.954) | 0.001 | 4.574(1.660~12.607) | 0.003 | |
组织学分级(高级别) | 3.354(1.483~7.595) | 0.004 | |||
腹水 | 1.282(0.622~2.638) | 0.501 | |||
肿瘤直径(≥6 cm) | 0.824(0.365~1.863) | 0.642 | |||
淋巴转移 | 3.106(1.415~6.815) | 0.005 | |||
CA125(≥35 U·L-1) | 5.324(1.831~15.475) | 0.002 | 4.417(1.426~13.686) | 0.010 | |
CAR | 2.618(1.240~5.526) | 0.012 | 3.167(1.392~7.206) | 0.006 | |
SII | 5.549(2.370~12.994) | <0.001 | 5.500(2.254~13.424) | <0.001 |
因素 | 单因素分析 | 多因素分析 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | ||
年龄(>65岁) | 1.345(0.628~2.880) | 0.446 | |||
绝经 | 0.759(0.365~1.578) | 0.460 | |||
FIGO分期(Ⅲ+Ⅳ期) | 5.642(2.129~14.954) | 0.001 | 4.574(1.660~12.607) | 0.003 | |
组织学分级(高级别) | 3.354(1.483~7.595) | 0.004 | |||
腹水 | 1.282(0.622~2.638) | 0.501 | |||
肿瘤直径(≥6 cm) | 0.824(0.365~1.863) | 0.642 | |||
淋巴转移 | 3.106(1.415~6.815) | 0.005 | |||
CA125(≥35 U·L-1) | 5.324(1.831~15.475) | 0.002 | 4.417(1.426~13.686) | 0.010 | |
CAR | 2.618(1.240~5.526) | 0.012 | 3.167(1.392~7.206) | 0.006 | |
SII | 5.549(2.370~12.994) | <0.001 | 5.500(2.254~13.424) | <0.001 |
[1] |
刘蓉, 王德刚. 卵巢癌组织中SIRT-1、CD44的表达及临床意义[J]. 检验医学, 2022, 37(7):632-635.
DOI |
[2] | YANG Y, QI S, SHI C, et al. Identification of metastasis and prognosis-associated genes for serous ovarian cancer[J]. Biosci Rep, 2020, 40(6):BSR20194324. |
[3] | 何旻, 陈观美, 程其会, 等. 血清CEA和Cyfra21-1水平及其与卵巢癌患者临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2021, 22(1):20-22. |
[4] | 何永梅, 金海红, 陈思思, 等. 外周血纤维蛋白原与白蛋白比值对卵巢癌预后的评估[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2021, 22(4):413-415. |
[5] | ZHANG Y, XIAO G, WANG R. Clinical significance of systemic immune-inflammation index(SII)and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio(CAR)in patients with esophageal cancer:a meta-analysis[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2019,11:4185-4200. |
[6] | 张辉, 施仲义, 胡一迪, 等. 术前系统免疫炎症指数和反应蛋白/血清白蛋白比值与非小细胞肺癌预后的相关性[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2019, 29(5):573-576. |
[7] | 林仲秋, 谢玲玲, 李晶. FIGO 2013卵巢癌、输卵管癌、腹膜癌新分期解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2013, 29(12):921-923. |
[8] |
YEH Y C, LEI H J, CHEN M H, et al. C-reactive protein(CRP)is a promising diagnostic immunohistochemical marker for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and is associated with better prognosis[J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2017, 41(12):1630-1641.
DOI URL |
[9] |
KATSURAHARA K, SHIOZAKI A, FUJIWARA H, et al. Relationship between postoperative CRP and prognosis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Anticancer Res, 2018, 38(11):6513-6518.
DOI PMID |
[10] | 叶宗伟, 杨毅宁. 血清C反应蛋白、白蛋白及其比值在炎症相关性疾病中的进展[J]. 医学综述, 2017, 23(20):3979-3983. |
[11] |
YAMAGATA K, FUKUZAWA S, ISHIBASHI-KANNO N, et al. Association between the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and prognosis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1):5446.
DOI PMID |
[12] |
KUDOU K, SAEKI H, NAKASHIMA Y, et al. C-reactive protein/albumin ratio is a poor prognostic factor of esophagogastric junction and upper gastric cancer[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2019, 34(2):355-363.
DOI URL |
[13] | 杜学峰, 徐永富, 戴启强, 等. C-反应蛋白/血清白蛋白比值与原发性肝癌临床病理特征及预后的关系[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2019, 29(10):1189-1193. |
[14] |
LIU Y, CHEN S, ZHENG C, et al. The prognostic value of the preoperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in ovarian cancer[J]. BMC Cancer, 2017, 17(1):285.
DOI PMID |
[15] |
YANG Y L, WU C H, HSU P F, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index(SII)predicted clinical outcome in patients with coronary artery disease[J]. Eur J Clin Invest, 2020, 50(5):e13230.
DOI URL |
[16] | 高娴, 范红星, 吴博, 等. 术前系统免疫炎症指数对远端胆管癌患者术后预后的评估价值[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2022, 31(2):217-224. |
[17] | 李健, 孟赛赛, 柏凯, 等. 系统免疫炎症指数与肝门部胆管癌患者术后预后的关系[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2021, 27(2):106-109. |
[18] |
WANG C, JIN S, XU S, et al. High systemic immune-inflammation index(SII)represents an unfavorable prognostic factor for small cell lung cancer treated with etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapy[J]. Lung, 2020, 198(2):405-414.
DOI |
[19] | 万梦园, 刘书娟, 刘晶晶, 等. 术前系统免疫炎症指数与胰腺癌患者预后的关系[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(19):2482-2486. |
[20] |
NIE D, GONG H, MAO X, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer:a retrospective study[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2019, 152(2):259-264.
DOI URL |
[1] | HUANG Lei, TANG Wenjia, ZHOU Yan, ZHOU Jiaye, ZHANG Chunyan, YANG Jing, WANG Beili, PAN Baishen, GUO wei. Prognosis of RDW-SD and RDW-CV in breast cancer patients with lymphatic metastasis [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2024, 39(4): 376-381. |
[2] | FANG Dandong, CHENG Gang, HUANG Wei, LIU Xiaonan, MAO Jian, HOU Baosen, LIU Shimin. Expression of lncRNA SOX21-AS1 and miR-875-5p in glioma tissues and relationship with prognosis of patients [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2024, 39(3): 209-214. |
[3] | MA Chen, ZHANG Yi, LI Fang, WANG Jing, CHEN Wei. Clinical characteristics,drug resistance and poor prognosis factors in children with invasive pneumococcal disease with necrotizing pneumonia [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2024, 39(3): 265-271. |
[4] | SONG Xiaolong, QIN Jinlü, YANG Ru, WEI Long, ZHOU Jianping. Application of serum TK1 in postoperative monitoring of thyroid papillary carcinoma patients [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2024, 39(2): 155-160. |
[5] | ZHANG Miaomiao, DUAN Dongkui, YU Chun, WANG Lina. Expression and prognostic assessment value of miR-924 and SLC1A5 in lung cancer tissues [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2024, 39(1): 13-18. |
[6] | LAN Jun, LU Shuting, YANG Jianrui. Roles of serum IL-26 and IL-27 levels in patients with colorectal cancer [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2024, 39(1): 7-12. |
[7] | WANG Yangshuyi, YE WEI, LIN Zhihao, HUANG Yuenuo, FANG Tao, DONG Xiaoting. Construction and validation of a model for pyroptosis-related features in lung adenocarcinoma [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(9): 833-841. |
[8] | ZHANG Han, LI Jun, LIU Xiaojiang, GUAN Yixiang. Role of serum albumin,interleukin-6 and ferritin combined determination in evaluating the functional prognosis of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(8): 713-718. |
[9] | ZHANG Na, NIU Weihua, SUN Yuanyuan, JIA Mei. CMV and EBV co-infection affecting patient prognosis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(8): 760-765. |
[10] | GUO Jie, LI Haixia, LI Xiaoyun. Correlation of preoperative RPR in peripheral blood with the prognosis of endometrial carcinoma patients [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(7): 675-679. |
[11] | WANG Tengfei, CHEN Shan, AN Hebing, ZHOU Lei. Expressions and roles of lncRNA CRNDE and miR-384 in peripheral blood of patients with acute leukemia [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(7): 686-691. |
[12] | YIN Ya, PAN Yuan, ZHOU Hongwei, SHEN Wei. Application progress of BNP and NT-proBNP in neonates [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(6): 518-523. |
[13] | ZHAO Jing, WANG Pei, LU Dandan, QI Dandan, LI Xuan. Expression levels of serum miR-4443 and TRAF4 in patients with hemorrhagic stroke [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(5): 413-418. |
[14] | SONG Shiwei, LI Jingwu, LIN Tao, LIU Zeyu, WANG Zhiqiang, SUN Weidong. Relationship between GPNMB and non-small cell lung cancer immune infiltration and prognosis [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(4): 347-351. |
[15] | LIU Junshan, GUO Mingfa, SUN Jia, SHI Lihuan, LIU Wei, DUAN Yongtao. Significance of minimal residual disease dynamic monitoring in the prognosis of acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia children with positive and negative ETV6/RUNX1 fusion genes [J]. Laboratory Medicine, 2023, 38(3): 209-214. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||