The comparison of the susceptibility test results of the Vitek-AMS and the Microscan methods with the E test method

›› 2000, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01): 24-25.

• 微生物学检验论著 • Previous Articles Next Articles

CLC Number:

[1]	ZHOU Tingyin;ZHAO Hu;CHEN Xianfeng;HU Haiqing;ZHOU Yun;HUANG Shanna. Evaluation and application of BioFosun-Ⅰ for identification of clinical pathogenic bacteria [J]. , 2006, 21(03): 198-200.
[2]	YING Chunmei;WEI Yingjue;WANG Yaping;ZHANG Haomin. Evaluation of the Phoenix-100 automated microbiology system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterococci [J]. , 2006, 21(02): 120-122.
[3]	. [J]. , 2005, 20(01): 75-78.
[4]	. The cloning and expression of ESAT-6 gene from Mycobacterium tuberculosis [J]. , 2004, 19(04): 349-351.
[5]	. Plasma endotoxin levels in patients with hepatitis [J]. , 2003, 18(02): 87-89.
[6]	. [J]. , 2003, 18(02): 101-102.
[7]	. The examination of bacteria of puncture fluid with smear and culture methods [J]. , 2002, 17(06): 358-359.
[8]	. [J]. , 2002, 17(04): 226-229.
[9]	. [J]. , 2002, 17(02): 111-112.
[10]	. [J]. , 2001, 16(06): 378-378.
[11]	. [J]. , 2001, 16(05): 303-304.
[12]	. [J]. , 2001, 16(04): 253-254.
[13]	. [J]. , 2001, 16(04): 252-252.
[14]	. [J]. , 2001, 16(04): 251-254.
[15]	. Recommendation of Hektoen enteric agar primary isolation 　media for stool specimens [J]. , 2001, 16(04): 214-215.

PDF (PC)